Home Blog Page 42

HIGHLIGHTS: Norway’s Warholm scares WR with 46.87 over 400 m H, then wins flat 400 m at Stockholm Diamond League! Wow!

Unstoppable: Norway's Karsten Warholm!

(★ Friends: Fabulous! Your 62 donations have covered our half-yearly server and support costs, and will help with December’s bill. If you would like to add your support, please donate here. Your enthusiasm is the reason this site continues. ★)

Headline results of noteworthy competitions around the world:

Athletics ● The most endangered world record on the track right now has to be Kevin Young (USA) and his 46.78 from the 1992 Olympic Games in Barcelona in the 400 m hurdles. On Sunday’s Bauhaus Galan Wanda Diamond League meet in Stockholm’s spectator-free Olympic Stadium, Norwegian star Karsten Warholm should have taken it for his very own.

Riding an eight-meet win streak over two seasons, Warholm rocketed out of the blocks from lane eight and flew away from the field immediately. He ran all alone coming around the final turn, but he was tiring from the pace and the wind inside the stadium and clipped the final hurdle, slowing him to the finish in … 46.87!

No doubt he would have had the record if not for his stumble (and if there had been a crowd to cheer him on), but it’s the no. 2 performance ever and Warholm now claims the nos. 2, 3, 10 and 11th-fastest races in history. His 46.87 was a European Record, of course, as well as a Diamond League record.

Warholm won the race by a stunning 2.23 seconds over France’s Wilfried Happio (49.14), who summed up the race for everyone other than Warholm later:

“It was very windy out there today. For us Warholm doesn’t exist! There is a lot of work to do to improve my times and compete against Warholm. Warholm has been running for 5 weeks so he is a little tired; however today was a good track and good conditions for him.”

American David Kendziera ran a season’s best for fifth in 49.47.

Warholm wasn’t done, however! He came back to run the flat 400 m 94 minutes later. Again in lane eight, he took a more conservative approach, starting slowly, but came on to the lead with about 150 m to go and cruised home to win in 45.05. Slovenia’s Luka Janezic was second in 45.85.

For Warholm, it’s his third-fastest 400 m ever – his lifetime best is 44.87 from 2017 – and it has to be the best-ever, one-day 400/400H double, right? All of this at age 24. Wow!

There were other events as well; highlights:

Men/800 m: After a fast opening lap by Slovenia’s Zan Rudolf in 49.90, the trio of Marco Arop (CAN), Swede Andreas Kramer and American star Donavan Brazier took the first three spots. It stayed that way into the home straightaway and Brazier turned on the afterburners to collect another Diamond League win in 1:43.76, well ahead of Arop (1:44.67) and Kramer (1:45.04). Said Brazier:

“Given the way I felt, I’d give myself a good grade; I don’t know if my coach would! Since I’ve been in Europe I’ve kind of been having problems with my foot, so I’m very pleased with that [win].”

Men/1,500 m: Here was the much-anticipated rematch of Kenya’s World Champion Tim Cheruiyot and Norway’s new European record holder Jakob Ingebrigtsen. Cheruiyot once again stayed at the front, just behind pacesetter Tim Sein (KEN), then took over with a lap to go.

Cheruiyot maintained the lead from Ingebrigtsen, Australia’s Stewart McSweyn and Jesus Gomez (ESP), and was never headed. He out-lasted Ingebrigtsen, 3:30.25-3:30.74, extending his lead in the final meters, with McSweyn third (3:31.48, a lifetime best) and Gomez fourth (3:33.46). American Craig Engels was sixth in 3:37.55. Cheruiyot ran his last 400 m in 55.55 to score his 10th straight 1,500 m/mile win.

Men/Pole Vault: Sweden’s Mondo Duplantis was the attraction, and won easily, clearing 5.73 m (18-9 1/2) on his first try. Sam Kendricks of the U.S. missed three times at that height, and Ben Broeders (BEL) was second with a third-try clearance. Duplantis cleared 5.83 m (19-1 1/2) on his first try, while Broeders missed three times. Now the winner, Duplantis cleared 6.01 m (19-8 1/2) on his first try – the outdoor world leader for 2020 – and went right to 6.15 m (20-2) to try for the best-ever jump outdoors, but missed three times.

Men/Long Jump: In the odd “final three” experiment, exactly what the critics warned of happened. South Africa’s Ruswahl Samaai was the favorite and got out to 8.07 m (26-5 3/4) on his first jump, but the leader at the end of five rounds was Swede Thobias Montler at 8.13 m (26-8 1/4), who jumped that distance twice (once windy, once legal wind). But the winner was whomever had the longest jump in the final round and Samaai got out to 8.09 m (26-6 1/2) and Montler, 8.06 m (26-5 1/2), with Kristian Pulli (FIN) third with a foul (8.02 m/26-3 3/4 earlier). Said an exasperated Montler:

“I’m happy with my four times over 8 m, but I’m not so happy with the competition system!”

Men/Discus: Sweden’s Daniel Stahl was the heavy favorite coming in and left no doubt with his second-round screamer that got out to 69.17 m (226-11). His countryman Simon Pettersson, having his best season ever, scored another lifetime best for second at 67.72 m (222-2) with 2017 World Champion Andrius Gudzius (LTU) third at 66.80 m (219-2).

Women/100 m: Swiss Alja del Ponte made in two in a row in the Diamond League, winning this time in 11.20 (wind +1.3) over Marije van Hunenstijn (NED: 11.28), with Marie-Josee Ta Lou (CIV) third in 11.32.

Women/400 m: American Wadeline Jonathas continued her strong running this season with a win in 51.94, well ahead of Britain’s Laviai Nielsen (52.16).

Women/800 m: Britain’s Jemma Reekie won impressively in 1:59.68, taking the lead with 200 m to go. American Raevyn Rogers was second with a season’s best of 2:01.02.

Women/1,500 m: British stars Laura Muir, Laura Weightman and Melissa Courtney-Bryant swept the top three places in 3:57.86 (world leader and he sixth-fastest ever), 4:01.62 and 4:01.81. Muir took over at the bell and maintained per lead to the finish, clocking the final 400 m in 59.86. American Shannon Rowbury got another seasonal best in sixth at 4:03.04.

Women/High Jump: The Ukrainian duo of Yuliya Levchenko and Yaroslava Mahuchikh continued their seasonal duel, with Mahuchikh equalling Levchenko’s world-leading mark of 2.00 m (6-6 3/4) on her final trial to win. Levchenko cleared 1.98 m (6-6) for second.

Women/Long Jump: The “final three” experiment here saw Sweden’s Khaddi Signia lead with a lifetime best of 6.83 m (22-5) after five rounds. But in the final round, 2019 Worlds silver medalist Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk (UKR) reached 6.85 m (22-5 3/4) for the win, with Rio Olympic triple jump champ Caterine Ibarguen (COL) jumping 6.61 m (21-8 1.4) for second and Signia finishing third, jumping only 5.73 m (18-9 3/4) on her final try.

Not as embarrassing as the men’s long jump, but still kind of silly. Complete results can be found here.

There was one other World Cup event of note on the weekend, in Sport Climbing, for Lead only, held in Briarcon, France. World Champion Adam Ondra (CZE) won the men’s division, reaching the top, just ahead of Domen Skofic (SLO: 41) and Austria’s Worlds bronze medalist, Jakob Schubert (38+). It’s Ondra’s 23rd career World Cup win.

Italy’s Laura Rogora, 19, upset World Champion Janja Garnbret (SLO) in women’s Lead, as both reached the top. Regora had a better semifinal score for the tie-breaker, and her first-ever World Cup win (and World Cup medal). France’s Fanny Gibert was third.

THE TICKER: Athletics Diamond League moves to Stockholm; Lyles wins two; USA Gymnastics and Nassar survivors at impasse in mediation

Another Stockholm win coming for Kenyan star Tim Cheruiyot?

(★ Friends: Amazing! Your 61 donations has covered our half-yearly server and support costs, and will help with December’s bill. If you would like to add your support, please donate here. Your enthusiasm is the reason this site continues. ★)

(Update: Some readers received an e-mail version of yesterday’s Lane One listing “Border Commission” in the headline instead of the correct “Borders Commission.” Our apologies for the error; the Web site story was/is correct.)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Athletics ● After the great success of the Wanda Diamond League opener in Monaco last Friday, there is considerable excitement about Sunday’s Bauhaus Galan in Stockholm’s famed 1912 Olympic Stadium. Among the expected highlights:

Men/800 m: Seven men ran under 1:45 in Monaco, led by a brilliant 1:43.15 from World Champion Donavan Brazier of the U.S. He will again face off with Canada’s Marco Arop (1:44.14 in Monaco), and Peter Bol (AUS: 1:44.96), plus emerging British star Max Burgin (1:44.75 at age 18!).

Men/1,500 m: The race of the meet on paper, with Kenya’s World Champion and world-leader Tim Cheruiyot (3:28.45) in a rematch with Norway’s 19-year-old Jakob Ingebrigtsen, who set a European Record of 3:28.68, older brother Filip Ingebrigtsen (3:30.35), Ethiopia’s Yomif Kejelcha (3:32.69) and others. Reigning U.S. national champ Craig Engels ran a very creditable 3:35.42 in Monaco … and was 11th!

Cheruiyot has won nine races in a row at 1,500 m/mile over the last two seasons and 12 of his last 13 going back to 2018, and he had something in reserve to deal with the Ingebrigtsens down the final straightaway in Monaco.

Men/400 m Hurdles: Norway’s Karsten Warholm opened with a sensational 47.10 in Monaco – equal-seventh fastest race in history – and here he is again, maybe with the world record in mind? He is certainly capable and is the overwhelming favorite here, ahead of Olympic and Worlds medalist Yasmani Copello (TUR) and American David Kendziera.

Men/Pole Vault: World-record holder Mondo Duplantis (SWE) will be going for another Diamond League win, but this time World Champion Sam Kendricks of the U.S. is expected to have his poles available and ready to compete. Also in the mix: Poland’s Worlds silver medalist Piotr Lisek, who is up to 5.90 m (19-4 1/4) on the season.

Men/Discus: Sweden’s Daniel Stahl is the best in the world and a big favorite here. He’s already out to 71.37 m (234-2) this year, but he thinks there is much more to come.

Women/100 m: Swiss Ajla del Ponte (11.16) shocked American Aleia Hobbs and Marie Josee Ta Lou (CIV) in Monaco. Does lightning strike twice?

Women/400 m: American Wadeline Jonathas – the 2019 NCAA champ at South Carolina – is getting her feet wet on the European circuit. She was second to Lynna Irby of the U.S. in Monaco (51.40), but is the lone U.S. entry here. She’ll be the favorite, but Czech Lada Vondrova (51.35) has the fastest seasonal best in the field.

Women/1,500 m: A star-studded field, with Hellen Obiri (twice 5,000 m World Champion) facing off with British stars Laura Muir (3:55.22 personal best), Laura Weightman (4:00.97) and Eilish McColgan (4:00.97), and former American Record holder Shannon Rowbury (3:56.29).

Women/400 m Hurdles: World leader Femke Bol (NED: 53.79) will have her hands full with two-time World Champion Zuzana Hejnova (CZE) and Swiss Lea Sprunger. No Americans in this race.

The meet is also a testing ground for a novelty format in the men’s and women’s long jump called the “Final Three.” The top three jumpers after five rounds will advance to a sixth-round final – no one else will jump – and the sixth-round marks will determine the order of finish for the top three. Ties will be broken by the next-best jump from the first five rounds.

Triple jump superstar Christian Taylor (USA) echoed the thoughts of many jumpers with this tweet:

“I hope this idea DOES NOT continue after this season. I also wish @WeAreTheSport could speak with the athletes or working group that believed this was a ‘good’ idea. I would like to understand how this could possibly be better than the traditional format.”

The meet will be shown on the NBC Sports Gold subscription channel; check your listings for possible airing on the NBC Olympic Channel as well.

At Thursday’s Irena Szewinska Memorial meeting in Bydgoszcz (POL), Ukraine’s Yulia Levchenko – the 2017 Worlds high jump silver medalist – became the first to clear 2.00 m (6-6 3/4) this season, winning in a tight battle with countrywoman Yaroslava Mahuchikh (1.97 m/6-5 1/2).

American Sam Kendricks – now with his poles – won the vault at 5.80 m (19-0 1/4) over Poland’s Piotr Lisek, who had to retire with an injury while trying 5.90 m (19-4 1/4).

At the Istvan Gyulai Invitational in Szekesfehervar (HUN) on Wednesday, American sprint star Noah Lyles stormed to wins in the 100 m (10.05) and 200 m (20.13), winning by comfortable margins both times.

Americans Kahmari Montgomery (400 m:45.40), Donavan Brazier (600 m: 1:15.07) and David Kendziera (400 m H: 50.00) won their races, while 110 m hurdles world champ Grant Holloway was edged by Spain’s Orlando Ortega, 13.21-13.22.

Lynna Irby of the U.S., having an excellent comeback season so far, won the women’s 200 m at 22.55 and Wadeline Jonathas took the women’s 400 m in 52.09.

No one is surprised any more at world-record performances from Swedish – via Louisiana – vault star Mondo Duplantis, but he was helped with what might have been a world-record performance from mom Helena.

A world-class heptathlete from Sweden, Helena Hedlund married U.S. vaulter Greg Duplantis and, as always, wanted to help her youngest son compete at the Wanda Diamond League opener in Monaco last Friday. When the airlines would not accept his poles as special cargo, Helena strapped the poles to the top of her car and drove the 25 hours – about 1,550 miles – from Sweden to Monaco in time for him to compete and win at 6.00 m (19-8 1/4).

As if that wasn’t enough, she then had to drive back with the poles to Uppsala in Sweden for Sunday’s national championships … which Mondo won at 5.63 m (18-5 1/2).

No worries for Sunday’s meet in Stockholm; it’s much closer!

The only World Athletics Continental Tour meet in the U.S. for 2020 will be at Drake Stadium in Des Moines, Iowa at the “Blue Oval Showcase”on 29 August.

It’s a third-tier (Bronze) meet on the Continental Tour, but some quality U.S. athletes are expected, including 2008 Olympic 100 m hurdles gold medalist Dawn Harper-Nelson and twice U.S. 400 m champ Shakima Wimbley. No fans will be allowed, however. The meet will be live-streamed on Runnerspace+.

In yet another demonstration of keeping up with technology, World Athletics published a compilation of approved shoes – yes, shoes – based on the new rules released in July regulating sole thickness.

The ultra-thick 40 mm-soled shoes used in road running and walking are not allowed on the track, where the sole thickness is limited to 20 mm for events from 100-600 m, and then 25 mm for events from 800 m and up, including the Steeplechase. Road-running shoes with soles of 25 mm of thinner are allowed on the track.

Field-event shoes are limited to 20 mm, except for the triple jump (25 mm).

The World Athletics notice included:

“Under Rule 5 of the Technical Rules, athletes (or their representative) have the responsibility to provide World Athletics with specifications of the new shoes the athlete proposes to wear in competition. World Athletics accepts shoe specification and samples submitted by manufacturers for further examination. …

“If the competition referee has a reasonable suspicion that a shoe worn by an athlete might not comply with the rules then at the conclusion of the competition the referee may request the shoe be handed over for further investigation by World Athletics.”

Note to officials: include a caliper in your equipment bag for future meets.

Badminton ● The delay from 2020 to 2021 for the Tokyo Olympic Games was too much for Japanese star Ayaka Takahashi, the 2016 Olympic women’s Doubles gold medalist.

She announced Wednesday that she will retire as of the end of this month in an online news conference, saying:

“For me it has always been all or nothing. When I train I train, when I rest I rest. The moment I started questioning my ability to win gold [in 2021] I knew it was time. I don’t want to play half-heartedly. It doesn’t feel right.

“I had doubts about my mind and body getting through another year.”

Takahashi, 30, was joined by her playing partner (and co-gold medalist) Misaki Matsutomo, who will continue.

Football ● FIFA released the agenda, schedule and supporting documents for its 70th Congress, to be held online on 18 September, including a detailed review of its 2019-22 financial plan and budget for 2021.

The finances were especially interesting, showing the impact of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020:

● The pandemic is estimated to cost FIFA about $200 million in revenue in 2020, but the targeted surplus for the 2019-2022 period of $100 million is expected to be achieved thanks to significant ongoing savings in operations (as well as events not played). In all, FIFA expects a total deficit for 2020 of $794 million.

● FIFA maintains a minimum reserve of $1.5 billion, and has an additional $1.245 billion in additional funds available from the 2015-18 quadrennial. The financial commitments to women’s football development of $1 billion for 2019-22 were reconfirmed.

● The forecast for the 2019-22 quadrennial shows both revenues and expenses to be down by about $120 million: $6.44 billion in revenue and $6.34 billion in costs. As of the end of May 2020, some 76% of all 2019-22 revenues have been secured by contract (mostly television rights and sponsorships).

It’s worth noting that the expected revenues from the FIFA World Cup in Qatar 2022 are forecast at $1.656 billion, with the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup in France generating $157 million.

The CONCACAF federation confirmed the schedule for the new format of the FIFA World Cup 2022 qualifiers, to begin June 2020 and continue through March 2022. Eight teams will play in a double round-robin, with the U.S., Mexico, Costa Rica, Honduras and Jamaica already qualified and the 30 remaining teams in the confederation playing for the three remaining spots.

The U.S. Men’s National Team will open with four games in June 2021, on the road against a qualifier, home to a qualifier and then an away match vs. Honduras and a home match vs. Jamaica. The American team will have four home matches in the first round and three in the second.

Gymnastics ● Within a Wednesday filing objecting to the applications for two gymnasts to join the survivors list, both USA Gymnastics and the Survivors Committee included this:

“Mediation was last conducted on August 11, 2020. After that session, the mediators informed the parties that the mediation is at an impasse.”

This is not what was hoped for by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robin Moberly, who asked the two sides to come with their best offers for settlement in July. A hearing on the USA Gymnastics Disclosure Statement – its offer for settlement, now being revised – is currently set for 19 October.

Both USA Gymnastics and the Survivors Committee filed objections to the requests for late inclusion in the survivors group from 2004 Olympic silver medalist Terin Humphrey and an unnamed gymnast. The objections began with:

“At this stage of this chapter 11 case, it would be irresponsible to allow additional claims to be asserted against the USA Gymnastics (the “Debtor”). This case has been widely reported in the general media, as well as sports and gymnastics focused media. The bar date was widely noticed and publicized. As such, there is no basis for a finding of excusable neglect to allow claims to be filed sixteen months after the bar date.”

The deadline for filing was set by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana on 25 February 2019 and declared to be 29 April 2019. A hearing on the motion for inclusion by Humphrey and the unnamed gymnast will be heard on 26 August.

The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee won a round in court on Wednesday, as a federal judge in Colorado dismissed a suit by the Philadelphia indemnity Insurance Company, asking to deny coverage in the Nassar abuse scandal because the court has no jurisdiction over the USOPC. This is the second try for the insurer, which has leave to appeal further if it desires.

Luge ● It’s a program that’s almost 35 years old, but still one of the “coolest” sponsorships in sports is the White Castle USA Luge Slider Search, introducing the sport to children from 9-13. White Castle … sliders … get it?!

With extra precautions in place and strictly limited to 10 kids at a time, the first session this season comes on Sunday, 23 August in Lake Placid, New York. The sleds are on wheels; the program includes:

“Once the participants master the ability to maneuver the sled in both directions, they will then slide from the White Castle USA Luge ramp onto the road surface to negotiate a shallow, gentle cone course.

“Under the guidance of national team coaches, the event will give these youth an opportunity to learn luge and qualify to join the USA Luge Junior Development team. This is the first rung on the ladder to national and Olympic team status. Children selected from the White Castle USA Luge Slider Search will be invited to learn the sport on ice next winter in Lake Placid on the same track where national team athletes train and compete each season.”

No, it’s not being televised. Yet.

Skiing ● The Federation Internationale de Ski (FIS) announced the cancellation of the North American leg of the Alpine Skiing World Cup in November. Races were scheduled at Lake Louise in Canada (Downhill/Super-G for men and women) and Beaver Creek, Colorado (men: Downhill/Super-G/Giant Slalom) and Killington, Vermont (women: Giant Slalom/Slalom).

Per FIS Chief Race Director Markus Waldner: “The training set-up and races in USA and Canada are very much appreciated by the teams. But ultimately, the unique logistics and situation for the early season alpine races has current travel restrictions and corresponding quarantine regulations in both directions, which led to this joint decision.”

The World Cup tour will stay in Europe and try to make up the races at later stops.

The Last Word ● The organizers of the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, England announced last week that due to the time crunch created by the coronavirus pandemic, the building of an athlete’s village has been scrapped.

Instead, three existing sites will be used: The University of Birmingham (for 2,800 athletes), The University of Warwick (1,900) and The NEC Hotel Campus (1,600). Some $653 million in public construction costs will be saved in Perry Barr area of Birmingham, but there is an ongoing need for added housing stock in the area, an issue which does not now concern the Commonwealth Games.

This is important because cities were repeatedly told – for decades – that campus housing was insufficient for major Games and that new facilities were de rigeur, even after the success of the 1984 Olympic Games, for which villages were created at UCLA, the University of Southern California and U.C. Santa Barbara (for rowing). The much-expanded UCLA housing complex will be the sole site for the 2028 Olympic Village in Los Angeles, and a new student-housing project will be the main athlete site for the 2026 Olympic Winter Games in Milan (ITA).

Hopefully, these developments have sealed the issue that student housing – if available – is more than sufficient for two weeks of Olympic, Paralympic or Commonwealth (or other) Games.

LANE ONE: Australian and Irish athletes say no protests on the podium, while USOPC gets 87% completion grade on one-year Borders Commission review

(★ Friends: You are fantastic! Now 60 donations to cover our half-yearly server and support costs, and helping with the next bill, in December. If you would like to add your support, please donate here. Your enthusiasm is the reason this site continues. ★)

You don’t normally hear too much about National Olympic Committees on a day-to-day basis. But 2020 is the year that is anything but normal.

Going into this year, the main object of concern among athletes in western countries was about the ability to publicize their personal sponsors during the Olympic Games period, taking advantage of one of the few times they might have some public visibility due to the popularity of the Games vs. the usual profile of their sport or event. But Olympic Charter Rule 40 controls this exposure and the International Olympic Committee broadened its view to allow NOCs to determine the amount of visibility allowed.

This tussle got lost in the aftermath of the 25 May killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with loud voices calling for the deletion of Olympic Charter Rule 50.2, which states:

“No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas.”

A set of guidelines was issued in January by the Athletes’ Commission of the International Olympic Committee, prohibiting protests on the field of play, on the victory stand, during ceremonies and in the Olympic Village. But protests were welcomed on social media, within team meetings and in interactions with news media.

The IOC’s Executive Board asked its Athletes’ Commission to take another look at the issue and the Commission in turn has asked National Olympic Committees to submit their recommendations on how the rule should be amended, deleted, or replaced.

In June, the Global Athlete group, which purports to be an “international athlete-led movement that will inspire and lead positive change in world sport, and collectively address the balance of power between athletes and administrators,” issued its own call “to immediately abolish” Rule 50, saying “Athletes will no longer be silenced.

Issue over, right?

Wrong.

Over the past few days, the “athlete voice” from two western countries – Australia and Ireland – declared that protests on the victory stand, a la Americans Tommie Smith and John Carlos in 1968 and Vince Matthews and Wayne Collett in 1972, are not favored venues for demonstrations.

Australia: 80+ percent against podium demonstrations

The Australian Olympic Committee released its survey results of 496 current and prior Olympians and 2020 Olympic hopefuls last Friday (14th). In response to the question of whether “A protest on the field of play would detract from the performance or experience of athletes,” only 348 answered the question.

But about 85% indicated that such protests would detract, with about 65% saying they “strongly agree” and 20% stating “Agree.” Roughly 9% said they were unsure.

As to where protests should NOT take place, the replies emphasized the Olympic Village, in the field of play, on the podium or just “at sporting events” or at the Olympic Games.

The survey showed almost 41% said the Games should not be a place for protest at all, and another 39% said OK “under some circumstances.” As to what those circumstances included, only 122 answered the question, with the responses favoring (1) NOT on the field if play, (2) NOT on the podium or at the Opening or Closing Ceremonies, (3) perhaps through “physical tokens” such as an armband or ribbon on the uniform, (4) a designated area in the Olympic Village, (5) in post-race interviews, news conferences or on social media. One highlighted comment:

“I believe post-competition interviews, social media, press conferences are an excellent opportunity to express such views, where the focus is solely on the individual. Thus, medal ceremonies and other group or engagements where other athletes are involved are not good times to express views as this can detract from the other individuals sharing that moment.”

There was also a desire to understand the Rule 50 guidelines better, with more specifics about what is allowed, what is not and possible penalties.

Ireland: Only 19% of those polled answered the questionnaire

The Athletes’ Commission of the Olympic Federation of Ireland sent a survey to an undisclosed number of Irish athletes, asking their opinion about Rule 50. The full survey details were not provided, but a news release on the results included:

“While the response rate of 19% could represent a limited depth with regards Rule 50 amongst many Irish athletes the majority of those who did respond (62%) indicated that some form of protest should be allowed with a strong preference for forms of protest that would not involve or impact the podium. This view was further re-enforced as 67% of respondents indicated they would not be in favour of unrestricted protest.”

The next step:

“Tokyo Olympic hopefuls and Olympians are now invited to take part in an open forum to discuss how to define a ‘considerate’ protest, which will take place online on the 3rd September. Following this the OFI Athletes’ Commission will establish a more concrete position from Team Ireland to present to the IOC.”

While the sentiment for an appropriate protest forum is similar to that heard from Australia, the stunning statistic is that only 19% of those surveyed responded. This is a metric to be watched closely in survey results from other countries.

Members of the IOC’s Athletes’ Commission have voiced interest in collecting survey results by the end of September so that a recommendation can be forwarded for possible action to the IOC’s Executive Board in advance of its 7 October meeting. There are many more voices to be heard before then, but the Australian and Irish surveys are hardly in line with what have been the loudest voices so far.

Loud voices have also been calling for the destruction, reconstruction or re-arrangement of the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee, but a one-year review of the progress since the issuance of the Borders Commission report last year indicates good progress.

The review, authored by group chair Lisa Borders – the former President of the WNBA – with counsel from Commission member (and 1984 Olympian) Michael Lenard and counsel Davis Butler, focused on whether the USOPC has acted on the 34 “Implementation Steps” listed in its July 2019 report.

The USOPC got a good grade, with a “full implementation” grade on 34 of the 39 items (87.2%) listed, with “in progress” marks on the other five. Not all of those items graded “full” have been implemented completely, some due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic; ten of the items included a note that the “Expectation is that USOPC will deliver as recommended.”

The review importantly noted that significant structural changes within the USOPC’s operating regulations had been made, but that:

“[T]he ultimate success of changing the culture cannot be fully gauged at this time.

“Second, in adopting most of those new or revised documents, the USOPC was inclusive in a manner that it had not been for over twenty years. The input of, and importantly agreement among, athletes (via the USOPC Athletes Advisory Council and US Olympic and Paralympic Alumni) and the sports (via the National Governing Bodies Council) was actively sought, and their representatives served and will continue to serve on important working groups and committees of the USOPC.”

The USOPC scored 13 full-implementations of 15 in the area of prioritizing athletes; the review also found:

● “Historical [NGB] funding based upon and tied to only the winning of medals has been expanded to include a broader and more holistic look at NGB performance”

● “The new model of collaborative efforts with athletes and NGBs in the development of the
criteria is significant”

● “Significant and commendable efforts have been made by the USOPC to transform its culture into an ‘athlete-centric culture’ providing protection of, service to and advancement of athletes as evidenced by revised Mission statement and other policy documents are commendable”

The review was favorable toward some of the proposed changes in the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, but did not mention the possible clashes with the Olympic Charter in the legislation since this was outside the purview of the Borders Commission scope of inquiry.

A good review to be sure, but one that will have to be followed up again to see if the momentum is maintained once competitions – and Olympic Games – resume.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Judo basks in catalyst role for Israel-UAE peace agreement; Leung says USA Gymnastics “not going anywhere”; “fascist salute” statue moved

Historic gold-medal ceremony at the 2018 Abu Dhabi Grand Slam, with (l-r) UAE Judo Federation head Mohamed bin Thaaloob Al Derei, Israeli Sports Minister Miri Regev, 81 kg winner Sagi Muki and IJF President Marius Vizer (Photo: IJF).

(★ Friends: Your amazing 58 donations since mid-June have covered our half-yearly server and support costs, and starting to help with the next bill. If you would like to help, please donate here. Your interest and support are the reasons this site continues. ★)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport (updated):

The surprise announcement of the normalization of relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates declared last Thursday (13th) was a happy day for the International Judo Federation.

A lengthy story on the IJF Web site celebrated the agreement and noted:

“What if we also told you that it is a judo-inspired agreement? Many would not believe us, although they should.”

With echoes of the odd “ping-pong diplomacy” incidents of 1971 that led to the historic 1972 visit of U.S. President Richard Nixon to China, the IJF story recalled the sporting breakthrough between Israel and the UAE in 2018.

In 2015 and 2017, an Israel team competed in the Abu Dhabi Grand Slam event under the conditions that any national identification on its uniform be covered and that its anthem and flag would not be presented in case of an Israeli victory in any division. In 2017, Tal Flicker won the men’s 66 kg class and saw the IJF flag raised instead of his own. He made up for the absence of his national anthem by singing it himself.

The UAE had claimed that such measures were needed to assure the “safety” of the Israeli delegation. IJF President Marius Vizer (ROM) had informed the UAE hosts that “all delegations, including the Israeli delegation, shall be treated absolutely equally in all aspects, without any exception.”

The following June, the IJF suspended the Abu Dhabi Grand Slam tournament in view of its actions against the Israel competitors. In the IJF story:

“They were months of many pressures, of a pulse between the correct and the standard. In silence, without agitating the media or organising propaganda campaigns, it was a low-key but tough diplomatic fight. Judo and its spirit won and until today the world has not offered thanks properly for the Herculean work of Marius Vizer and [IJF Treasurer] Naser Al Tamimi [of the UAE].”

The result was an agreement to abide by the IJF rules and the tournament was reinstated. In October 2018, Israel Sagi Muki – now World Champion – won the 81 kg class. He was presented with his medal by Israeli Sports Minister Miri Regev – specially invited for the event – and both stood while the Israeli flag was raised the its national anthem was played.

More from the IJF:

“That was history, and we are proud of that, especially now. Judo smashed down the walls of misunderstanding and anger and for that we want to congratulate the signatories of the agreement from here. If Donald Trump wishes to appropriate the success and paternity of the gestation of the pact, it seems great to us because, after all, Trump himself organised an international judo tournament in Florida a few years ago, before he was ever a candidate for the White House. Maybe he drew on memories, maybe our values were a source of inspiration. In any case, his mediation has been decisive. But, if you allow us an ephemeral exercise of false modesty, we claim our share in this historic development.”

Is the IJF claiming too much credit? Maybe, maybe not. But Vizer and his federation has stood firm against anti-Israeli activities by other Arab countries and especially by Iran and deserves praise for its actions when so many others have looked the other way.

Athletics ● Just a day before the powerful re-start of the Wanda Diamond League in Monaco, bad news for the sport in one of its strongest markets: reports that the BBC will not renew its six-year deal with U.K. Athletics.

The agreement to televise national meets – not the Diamond League – was apparently worth about £3.0 million a year (~ $3.9 million), but the BBC did not feel that it was getting its money’s worth.

Beyond losing the money, the reports further noted that the federation’s major sponsorships with Muller (a dairy firm) and Nike could be endangered, since much of their exposure was tied to the television exposure offered through the BBC deal.

Cycling ● It was a wild weekend of racing on the UCI World Tour as the Tour de France draws nearer, set to begin on 29 August.

In France, the five-stage Criterium du Dauphine, a closely-watched Tour warm-up event, looked to be the property of Slovenian star Primoz Roglic, one of the favorites for this year’s Tour. But although he led after the fourth stage, he suffered a crash during the stage and limped in, unable to ride in the final segment.

That left France’s Thibaut Pinot in front, but with six riders within a minute going into the hilly, 142.5 km final ride. And while American Sepp Kuss won the stage, Colombia’s Daniel Felipe Martinez was second and Pinot seventh and Martinez won the overall title by 29 seconds over the Frenchman. No word yet on the extent of Roglic’s injuries.

At last Saturday’s 114th running of Il Lombardia from Bergamo to Como, Belgian star Remco Evenpoel crashed and suffered a fractured pelvis and a right lung contusion while riding with the leading group in the descent from the Colma di Sormano – the highest point in the race.

“Evenepoel crashed inside the last 50 kilometre hitting a bridge wall and going over it into a ravine,” reported his team, Deceuninck-Quick Step.

“Remco was conscious at all times as he underwent a series of examinations to reveal the extent of his injury. Unfortunately, the X-rays showed a fractured pelvis and a right lung contusion, which will keep Evenepoel on the sidelines for the upcoming period.”

The 231 km race was won by Jakob Fuglsang (DEN), who sprinted away from the field, with New Zealand’s George Bennett second and Russia’s Aleksandr Vlasov third.

Gymnastics ● USA Gymnastics held a “virtual” National Congress on 8-9 August, opening with an 11-minute presentation by federation chief Li Li Leung that emphasized not only its continuing activity, but also it’s continuing status:

“I want to assuage any doubt about the future of USA Gymnastics, and some rumors that might be swirling lately. We are still here and we don’t plan on going anywhere. To be clear and specific about it, we are still planning to exit bankruptcy later this year, or early next year, and are engaging in mediation to help move that along, and hopefully find mutually-agreeable resolution with the survivors. We have not been de-certified and we are 100% committed to the future of this sport and serving the gymnastics community.”

She praised the resilience of the membership, but also noted that “virtual sanctions” are being explored “so you all can continue the competitive atmosphere in a safe and socially-distanced way.”

Leung also noted that a new leadership at USAG has been built over the last year and a half and that the organization’s mission has been redefined as:

“To build a community and a culture of health, safety and excellence, where athletes can thrive in sport and in life.”

She also previewed a forthcoming “Athlete Bill of Rights,” developed after wide consultations and which will include, in part, the right to:

● Participate in gymnastics
● Train and compete safely
● Have their personal health and wellness prioritized
● Provide input on matters that directly affect them
● Voice opinions on issues that may affect the gymnastics community

Leung noted several training initiatives that will incorporate social-justice elements and then dropped a bombshell on judging and scoring:

“We’re looking at ways implicit bias may impact judging and have identified two researchers from top, prestigious universities tp analyze our competition data. They are in the process of reviewing our data and mapping out the scope and length of the project.”

She also mentioned new commercial partnerships to be announced “which can deliver real value to our members and companies which show the same commitment to athletes that we do” and a commitment to highlight “the power of positive coaching.”

Leung closed with a thank-you to the coaches, judges, families and volunteers who have been largely forgotten while USAG tried to “improve the athlete experience” and fight through its current bankruptcy proceedings.

While USAG has a long way to go in all of the areas Leung outlined, these kinds of activities are important not only in actual reform of the sport in the U.S., but in whether the federation will be de-certified in the years ahead as the U.S. National Governing Body for gymnastics. The U.S. House is now considering S. 2330, which allows the U.S. Congress to vaporize any U.S. NGB via joint resolution, a stance which may run afoul of the International Olympic Committee’s rules on national autonomy of sport.

Swimming ● FINA, the international federation for swimming, announced a six-leg World Cup schedule for 2021 in September (2 meets) and October (4) in Asia, Europe and the Middle East. All six will act as qualifiers for the December 2021 World Short-Course Championships in Abu Dhabi (UAE).

By itself, the announcement was commonplace, but it also places the events in the midst of a possible International Swimming League (ISL) season, which took place in October, November and December of 2019. Although the rhetoric between the two sides has cooled, there are still two ISL-related lawsuits against FINA still moving – glacially – through the discovery process, with trial slated for January of 2022!

It’s an open question as to whether ISL will still exist by then; its Solidarity Program is to begin paying its 300+ contracted swimmers $1,500 monthly beginning 1 September and continuing through 1 July 2021.

Italy’s reigning Olympic 1,500 m Freestyle champ, Gregorio Paltrinieri swam the second-fastest time in the history of the event, winning the Italian national championships race in Rome last Thursday (14th) in 14:33.10.

Only the 14:31.02 world record by Yang Sun (CHN) from the London Games in 2012 is faster. Paltrinieri’s also won the 800 m Free in 7:40.22, the no. 8 mark ever. Said the star:

“It’s too good. I didn’t know how fast I was going, I knew I was going strong because I felt the swim like never before. 14:33 is really strong, I would never have dreamed of it.”

It’s another demonstration of how special a 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo might have been.

World Games 2022 Birmingham ● A unique ruling by the International World Games Association and the Birmingham 2022 organizers will allow the Haudenosaunee Nation to compete in the 2022 World Games if approved by World Lacrosse.

The Haudenosaunee is a group of six nations of pre-Columbian Americans also known as the Iroquois Confederacy, living in southeastern Canada and in the northeast U.S.

Competing as an independent entry, the Haudenosaunee finished third in the 2018 World Lacrosse Championships and would merit entry (the women finished 12th in the 2019 women’s Worlds). World Lacrosse sponsored the petition to the IWGA emphasizing “the position of honor held by the Haudenosaunee Nation, as the originators of the game.”

Naturally, the talk instantly turned to the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, which is targeted by lacrosse for inclusion. According to an editorial on one fan site, “If the creators of the game aren’t there, then the game, as a whole, shouldn’t be there either.” The Haudenosaunee have no National Olympic Committee and while World Lacrosse is a recognized International Federation, it is not close to Olympic recognition on its own.

While not burning now, this may be a log thrown into a future fire at the feet of the Los Angeles organizers for 2028.

At the BuZZer ● A statue of an athlete with his right arm raised in salute outside the Olympic Stadium for the 1928 Olympic Games in Amsterdam (NED) has been removed after an inquiry determined that the salute had fascist connotations.

The statue was erected in honor of Baron Tuyll van Serooskerken, who helped bring the Olympic Games to the city. A story on nltimes.nl explained:

“The Foundation concluded in its investigation that Baron de Coubertin, a founding member of the International Olympic Committee who spearheaded the the launch of the modern Olympic Games, introduced the right armed raised gesture in 1924 at the Paris Games. That was at the same time as the rise of fascism in Italy under Mussolini, the Foundation determined. The Italian fascist movement adopted the gesture as a salute. Later, the Nazis in Germany did the same.

“[Foundation director Ellen] Van Haarem stressed that artist Gerarda Rueb did not have bad intentions when creating the sculpture. ‘You have to keep the two lines well separated from each other. You have the historical fact that the salute dates from a fascist era, and you also have the intention of the maker of the statue to express the so-called sporty greeting from 1924,’ she said to [the Dutch newspaper] Trouw, but added: ‘Once you have established that the salute itself can be traced back directly to fascism, you have to take action.’”

The statue was moved to inside the stadium, where it can be properly explained in the context of its times.

Update: Thanks to reader Waikiki Jim for recognizing a typo in the swimming story; Abu Dhabi will host the 2021 World Short-Course Championships.

LANE ONE: Wheelchair basketball, the Paralympics and another legacy of the Greatest Generation revealed in forthcoming “Wheels of Courage”

(★ Friends: Thank you! Your 57 donations since mid-June have covered our half-yearly server and support costs, and starting to help with the next bill. If you would like to help, please donate here. Your interest and support are the reasons this site continues. ★)

It is today quite fashionable to wring one’s hands, shake the head and declare that these are dark times for our country, for the world and for this group or that.

The soon-to-be released Wheels of Courage: How Paralyzed Veterans from World War II Invented Wheelchair Sport, Fought for Disability Rights, and Inspired Nation explains that individuals can change their – and our – future for the better, aided by the inevitable march of technology and the goodwill of people who are willing to help.

In expanding an article originally written for Los Angeles Magazine, Los Angeles-based author David Davis uncovered the astonishing story of how World War II veterans overcame devastating injuries that had doomed their World War I predecessors to death less than three decades earlier. We are introduced early to three of them:

Johnny Winterholler, a 1939 honorable-mention All-American in football at the University of Wyoming, who was taken prisoner by the Japanese in the capture of the Philippines in 1941, eventually suffering paralysis of both legs due to maltreatment as a prisoner of war.

Stan Den Adel of Corte Madera, California was shot and paralyzed in combat on the German-Austrian border a week before the end of fighting in Europe in May of 1945.

Gene Fesenmeyer of Shambaugh, Iowa was on Okinawa in late May of 1945 when he was hit by a sniper’s bullet and lost the use of his legs.

For centuries, severe spinal injuries were “certain death and are ‘an ailment not to be treated.’” In World War I, victims of paralysis of the lower body and legs – “paraplegia” in medical terms – had died up to 90% of the time within one year following injury. But major advances such as the discovery of penicillin in 1928, sulfa tablets to restrict the growth of bacteria and revolutionary methods of collecting, maintaining and transporting blood and plasma to the front lines started saving lives in the 1940s.

Some 2,500 paralyzed veterans survived the war. Davis notes, however, “They were, at once, medical marvels and medical enigmas.” What to do with them now?

A new set of heroes emerge in this post-victory setting, including Dr. Ernest Bors of Hammond General Hospital of Staten Island, New York, who fled Czechoslovakia to escape Nazi oppression in 1940, and Dr. Howard Rusk from the Jefferson Barracks Hospital outside St. Louis, who convinced new U.S. Veterans Administration head Gen. Omar Bradley that rehabilitation was just as important as surgery: “We have to treat the whole man. And we also had to teach his friends and family how to accept him and help him in his new condition.”

The Veterans Administration established seven spinal-cord injury treatment centers across the nation, with Bors heading the new Birmingham General Hospital in Van Nuys, California; two additional naval hospitals were also designated for specialized care.

Den Adel was transferred to Birmingham General in November 1945 and saw similarly-paralyzed vets playing a simplified form of volleyball – with a lowered net – outdoors in the huge, wooden wheelchairs typical of the time, that had the main wheel in the front and small, stabilizing wheels in the back:

“When one of them accidentally steered his wheelchair into a wall, the others lambasted the poor soul: ‘Hey, Crip, do you have a license to drive that thing?’

“Den Adel couldn’t help laughing. Being together with others who were facing the same disability, all of them figuring out how to accommodate and assimilate their altered condition, was enormously therapeutic. ‘Every day somebody did something we didn’t know could be done from a wheelchair,’ he later wrote. ‘We shared our experiences with each other, speeding up the whole rehab process.’”

At the same time, there was a strong push to support veterans who had come home with varying difficulties, not only with treatment, but with jobs. News media were strongly supportive, as the times and trials of 16,000,000 U.S. veterans impacted every community in the nation.

Oldsmobile started offering cars with special hand controls to allow paraplegics to drive. Everest & Jennings, a Los Angeles firm, now offered a lightweight, foldable wheelchair made of chromed steel, vastly improving mobility.

In 1946, Birmingham Hospital’s assistant athletic director, Bob Rynearson, started offering basketball to the veterans, with some modest rule changes: two wheel pushes before dribbling, passing or shooting, 20 seconds to advance the ball past half-court and six seconds in the lane. Although the hospital’s gym was cramped, the vets quickly showed interest in the game, a highly competitive spirit and no trouble with getting back in action after a spill (often caused by a hard foul).

This was all in less than a year following V-J Day. While excruciating slow from the inside, and amazingly fast from the outside, Davis does a well-paced job of running the camera of your mind through the progress from shock to sorrow to exercise to competition to a future life.

On 25 November 1946, Rynearson had his “team” face off against a team of doctors from the hospital, who used borrowed wheelchairs. The vets won easily, 16-6, in what is considered the first wheelchair contest.

Then they started playing other, non-disabled teams in wheelchair games at the Pan-Pacific and Shrine Auditoriums in Los Angeles, and at the Long Beach Auditorium, with growing fan attendance and media interest.

At the same time, vets at Cushing General Hospital in Framingham, Massachusetts, were experimenting with their own brand of basketball. Their rules allowed racing downcourt without dribbling or passing, and even slight touches of chairs were called as fouls. On 5 December 1946, they played in a preliminary game in the Boston Garden against the Boston Celtics, prior to the Celtics-Detroit Falcons game in the new Basketball Association of America. Cushing won easily, 18-2.

Fesenmeyer and Winterholler were both recovering at the Naval Hospital at Corona (California), when it began offering wheelchair basketball, using Rynearson’s rules and methods from Birmingham. Inevitably, the two sides met in February 1947 in Corona, with Birmingham’s “Flying Wheels” defeating the “Rolling Devils,” 21-6, in the first match between organized wheelchair teams.

Playing with Winterholler in the line-up two months later, the Devils won the rematch, 41-10.

Now the Rolling Devils began making road trips, playing non-disabled teams in wheelchairs, including a 38-16 win over the semi-pro Oakland Bittners before 8,000 at the Oakland Auditorium, in a game sponsored by the Oakland Tribune. The net proceeds, as always, went to veterans’ relief funds.

Newspaper and newsreel coverage made the wheelchair game a national sensation. Teams sprung up at veterans’ hospitals everywhere, especially in the New York, an area already crazy for basketball. Halloran Hospital on Staten Island became the primary challengers to Cushing General from Massachusetts.

Out west, the active-duty Corona hospital facility required that the recovering, but discharged, vets go elsewhere, but Birmingham’s V.A. hospital team was still playing. A barnstrorming tour was arranged, but when the V.A. would not allow it, the players checked out of the hospital and boarded a plane. Fundraising was led by L.A. Herald-Express columnist John Old, with help from sportscaster Bob Kelley, star singer Bing Crosby and a young public-relations man named Tex Schramm, who went on to greater heights with the Dallas Cowboys of the NFL.

Wins in Kansas City, Chicago and Buffalo led to a February 1948 match-up of west vs. east in Framingham, as Cushing General – the “Clippers” – routed Birmingham, 18-7, using their “eastern” rules in what was hyped as the “world wheelchair basketball championship.”

There were more games in New York, in Richmond and Washington, D.C., which also included lobbying Congress for more benefits for veterans, and then more games before returning home.

A few days later, on 10 March 1948, some 15,561 fans filled Madison Square Garden in New York to see a doubleheader of Halloran General vs. Cushing General, won by Halloran, 20-11, prior to St. Louis’s 82-73 win over the Knicks in Basketball Assn. of America action. Wrote Davis:

“When the game started, the chatter in the stands gave way to uneasy, muted murmuring. Halloran’s Jack Gerhardt was speeding around the court like racecar driver Mauri Rose cornering at the Indianapolis 500 when he collided with another player and spilled out of his chair. Matrons gasped and dabbed at their eyes with handkerchiefs; crusty sportswriters complained that the smoke from their Lucky Strikes was causing them to tear up. But after Gerhardt muscled his body back into his chair and demanded the ball, and after the Cushing crew brayed their displeasure at the officials – ‘Whatsamatta, ref, can’t you hear either?’ – the mood inside the arena relaxed, and the fans began to cheer and whistle as if they were witnessing a miracle.”

All of this in two-and-a-half years after the end of the war. But as the veterans continued to recover, they yearned for the same things as their fellow brothers-in-arms: marriage, family, a home of their own and a career.

Slowly, the story of wheelchair basketball grew beyond the purview of WWII veterans, especially after the Korean War, and companies like Bulova and Pan American Airways saw promotional benefits from sponsoring teams, as well as from hiring wheelchair-bound veterans. Davis chronicles the long road from the novelty and wonder of injured veterans putting on a show on the basketball floor to the formation of the National Wheelchair Basketball Association to passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act in the 1990s.

And the rest of the world was not asleep. What started as a wheelchair archery tournament named the Stoke Mandeville Games, held concurrently with the 1948 Olympic Games in London, eventually became the Paralympic Games, now formally attached to the Olympic Movement and which will host 4,400 athletes in 22 sports in Tokyo in 2021.

Davis includes rich details of the support for these veterans, especially in the late 1940s, from Hollywood stars to fawning news coverage, as well as the eventual in-fighting between these pioneer teams and the expansion of disabled sport within the U.S. and worldwide. The pace of the book slows in the final third, as the V.A. narrowed its support for sports that took patients out of their hospitals for more than two days in 1950, the same year as the Birmingham Hospital was closed (it’s now the site of Birmingham High School, with the appropriate nickname of the Patriots.)

Published by Center Street, a division of Hachette Book Group, the book will launch officially on 25 August, which was to have been the date of the opening of the 2020 Paralympic Games in Tokyo. But you don’t have to wait a year to enjoy the story of how veterans and those who believed in them changed their world and ours for the better: you can pre-order it here.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: Sensational Diamond League opener, with 12:35.36 5,000 m WR for Cheptegei; Aussie aths say no to OG protests; remembering Sport Intern’s K-H Huba

U.S. sprint superstar Noah Lyles

(★ Friends: Wow! Your 55 donations over the past few weeks have covered our half-yearly server and support costs. The next bill is coming, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Your interest and support are the reasons this site continues. ★)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Athletics ● It was a long time coming, but maybe it was worth the wait for the opening of the 2020 Wanda Diamond League season, thanks to sensational marks in nearly all of the events and a world record in the men’s 5,000 m by Uganda’s Joshua Cheptegei!

There were world-leading marks in 11 of the 14 events on the program:

Men’s 200 m: 19.76, Noah Lyles (USA)
Men’s 800 m: 1:43.15, Donavan Brazier (USA)
Men’s 1,500 m: 3:28.45, Tim Cheruiyot (KEN)
Men’s Steeple: 8:08.04, Soufiane El Bakkali (MAR)
Men’s 5,000 m: 12:35.36, Joshua Cheptegei (UGA) ~ World Record
Men/110 m H: 13.11, Orlando Ortega (ESP)
Men/400 m H: 47.10, Karsten Warholm (NOR)
Men/Pole Vault: 6.00 m (19-8 1/4), Mondo Duplantis (SWE)
Women/400 m: 50.50, Lynna Irby (USA)
Women/1,000 m: 2:29.15, Faith Kipyegon (KEN)
Women/5,000 m: 14:22.12, Hellen Obiri (KEN)

The highlight turned out to be a near-solo performance by Cheptegei, 23, the 10,000 m World Champion in 2019 and world-record setter in the road 5 km earlier this year (12:51).

He didn’t just run with the pacesetters, he launched a world-record attempt all by himself, actually running faster laps after the pacers left the track. He ran 59.97 for his penultimate lap and 59.64 for the final lap to finish in 12:35.36, shattering the thought-to-be-safe 2004 mark of 12:37.35 by Kenenisa Bekele (ETH).

He won by more than 16 seconds over Kenya’s Nicholas Kimeli (12:51.78), finishing his final four laps (1,600 m) in 4:00.12 and his last 2,000 m in 5:00.22! Wow! Cheptegei is now the second-ever Ugandan world-record holder on the track, after John Akii-Bua’s stunning 47.82 win in the 400 m hurdles at the 1972 Olympic Games.

Cheptegei said later: “I think Monaco is a special place and it’s one of these places where I could break the world record. It took a lot of mind setting to keep being motivated this year because so many people are staying at home but you have to stay motivated.

“I pushed myself, I had the right staff with me, the right coach. I’m also usually based in Europe, but being based in Uganda with my family was actually great. I will for sure celebrate the world record when I get home.”

The much-anticipated men’s 200 m started with Noah Lyles in his favorite lane seven, raising a gloved right fist during the event introductions. He ran to the lead right away and came off the turn in the lead and then turned on the speed down the home straight for a world-leading 19.76 (wind +0.7 m/s). His younger brother Josephus was strong down the straight as well, finishing second in 20.30. Said Noah afterwards, “I’m just happy to be racing again.”

In the men’s 800 m, World Champion Donavan Brazier ran easily over the first 600 m, took over on the final turn as expected from Canada’s Marco Arop, but with countryman Bryce Hoppel hot on his heels. Hoppel essentially shadowed Brazier throughout the race and although he didn’t have the speed to overtake him, he was right there at the finish and scored a lifetime best of 1:43.23 for second. Brazier improved his world-leading mark to 1:43.15, his third-fastest time ever. Hoppel’s time moves him to no. 7 all-time U.S.

But Brazier wasn’t that impressed, “The time wasn’t the best for me.” Hoppel was happy: “Training has been weird for me because I currently don’t have a team to train with, but running here turned out amazing, a lot better than I thought.”

Kenya’s World Champion Tim Cheruiyot decided he needed to make a statement, and was the only one to run with the pacesetters through 800 m, in 1:51.24. Cheruiyot led three others at 1,200 m in 2:47.64, but even with strong challenges by Jakob Ingebrigtsen (NOR) and Jake Wightman (GBR), Cheruiyot steamed to the finish in 3:28.45. Ingebrigtsen got a European Record of 3:28.68 in second and Wightman was third in a lifetime best of 3:29.47.

Morocco’s Soufiane El Bakkali won the Steeple as expected, finishing with a world-leading 8:08.04, out-lasting Kenya’s Leonard Bett (8:08.78).

In the straight hurdles, World Champion Grant Holloway got out strongly, but it was Spain’s Orlando Ortega who came on strongest over the last three hurdles to grab the win in a world-leading 13.11. Britain’s Andrew Pozzi equaled his personal best at 13.14 and Holloway faded to fourth in a season-best of 13.19. Said Holloway, “13.19 is a good season best. With everything going on, I’ll take it. It is what it is, 2020 is a lot of chaos.”

In the 400 m hurdles,. Norway’s Karsten Warholm stepped on the gas from the start and was way out in front from the beginning. He won easily, finishing in an astounding 47.10, a meet record and the equal-eighth fastest race in history. Only five other men – including himself – have ever run faster! He said afterwards, “This was a very, very good season opener. I felt very strong, things I’ve been working on actually worked!”

Most of the drama in the men’s vault vanished when American Sam Kendricks’s poles did not arrive, so Swedish world-record holder Mondo Duplantis won the event with a clearance at 5.80 m (19-0 1/4). He then cleared 6.00 m (19-8 1/4) and went to 6.15 m (20-2), missing three times at what would have been the highest-ever jump outdoors.

A complete shock in the women’s 100 m, with Ajla del Ponte of Switzerland taking the lead in the middle of the race and running away from Marie-Josee Ta Lou (CIV) and American Aleia Hobbs in 11.16. Hobbs was second in 11.28; Ta Lou was fourth in 11.39.

American Lynna Irby, the 2018 NCAA champ in the 400 m, won in impressive fashion in a world-leading 50.50, passing Wadeline Jonathas – the 2019 NCAA winner – off the final turn, who finished second in 51.40.

The women’s 1,000 m also looked like world-record possibility and reigning Olympic 1,500 m champ Faith Kipyegon took charge with 300 m left and ran away with the win in 2:29.15, the no. 2 time in history, just 0.17 over the world record. Britain’s Laura Muir finished second in 2:30.82, making her the no. 7 performer all-time.

In the women’s 5,000 m, the expected battle between superstars Sifan Hassan (NED) and Kenya’s Hellen Obiri evaporated when Hassan retired with 2 1/2 laps to go. Obiri took over with two laps to go from Letesenbet Gidey (ETH), then lost it again as Gidey took the bell. Gidey strayed from the curb on the back straight and Obiri stormed inside her with a half a lap to go – to Gidey’s surprise – and ran away to an easy win in 14:22.12, her fourth-best ever.

The women’s high jump was an all-Ukrainian showdown as expected, with Yaroslava Mahuchikh out-dueling Worlds silver winner Yuliya Levchenko, with both clearing 1.98 m (6-6); Mahuchikh won with a first-time clearance at 1.95 m (6-4 3/4).

Venezuela’s two-time World Champion Yulimar Rojas won the triple jump as expected at 14.27 m (46-10).

The conditions appeared to be excellent, with a new track and an appreciative crowd – a limit of 5,000 was in place – plus some nifty new lighting effects that were nice to see. More than anything else, the meet was a glimpse of what could have been seen in Tokyo in the Olympic Games had been held this year. “Spectacular” would appear to be an understatement; maybe “historic”?

The Wanda Diamond League will continue in Stockholm (SWE) on 23 August.

The Russian Athletics Federation confirmed on Wednesday (12th) that it had forwarded the $6.31 million owed to World Athletics prior to the 15 August deadline and avoided potential expulsion.

The funds were provided by the Russian Sports Ministry through the intervention of Minister Oleg Matytsin, after the Russian federation missed an earlier deadline due to lack of funds. According to a ministry statement:

“Taking into account the crisis situation, which erupted in the Russian track and field athletics, the Russian Sports Ministry made an unprecedented decision to allocate the All-Russia Athletics Federation a one-off subsidy for the development of this sport and for the federation to repay its debt to World Athletics.”

This is, however, only one step in the road to reinstatement for RusAF. A comprehensive plan for Russian anti-doping efforts in athletics is due by the end of the month.

The Athletics Integrity Unit published its annual report for 2019, noting it collected samples from 2,632 athletes in 135 countries

The ratio of sample collection shows 2.46 samples collected out-of-competition to every in-competition sample. That’s good. Interestingly, of the 10,921 samples collected, 49% were from distance runners (sprinters next at 18%) and 41% from Africa (North America next at 24%).

There were a total of 376 disciplinary cases brought in 2019: 95 of these were by the AIU itself and 277 national anti-doping cases (plus four others). Of the 98 investigations opened in 2019, 37 were completed and the remainder are ongoing.

The cost of operations for 2019 was $8.70 million, with testing and compliance the largest single area at $3.41 million (39.0%) and $1.76 million for case management.

Cycling ● Switzerland extended its ban on gatherings of more than 1,000 people through the end of September, which wiped out the 2020 UCI World Road Championships, scheduled for 20-27 September in Aigle-Martigny.

This is a major loss for the world calendar, with 1,200 riders from 90 countries expected to compete in 11 races over eight days in senior, junior and U-23 divisions.

The UCI noted in a statement:

“Given the sporting importance of the UCI Road World Championships for cycling, the UCI would like to clarify that it will work towards finding an alternative project to ensure the 2020 edition of the event can take place, with the priority being in Europe and at the dates initially scheduled. It could include all or some of the planned races.”

An announcement is planned for 1 September at the latest.

In the meantime, the five-stage Criterium du Dauphine is continuing in France, with Belgium Wout van Aert, Slovenian star Primoz Roglic and Davide Formolo of Italy winning the first three stages. Roglic is the overall leader, 14 seconds ahead of Thibaut Pinot (FRA) with two more hilly stages on Friday and Saturday still ahead.

Coming up tomorrow (15th) is the second of the season’s “monument” races, the 114th Il Lombardia, from Bergamo to Como. Italian fans will be hoping for a third career win for Vincenzo Nibali, but defending champion Bauke Mollema (NED) will make a strong argument for a repeat.

Fencing ● It’s not a new comment, but a nice reminder about fencing and social distancing from reader Jim Bendat:

Fencing is the ultimate COVID-19 sport:
o You wear a mask
o You wear gloves
o If anyone gets within six feet of you,
o You stab them!

Like everyone else, the FIE international calendar is on hold for now.

Ice Hockey ● So much for trying to keep politics and sport apart. The newest dust-up is over the 2021 IIHF World Championships, scheduled to take place in Belarus and Latvia in May 2021.

In the aftermath of the election of Alexander Lukashenko’s re-election for a sixth term on 8 August, reportedly with 80% of the vote over Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, civic protests have erupted daily.

Reports indicate that more than 6,700 people have been detained, and questions are now being raised about holding the event in Belarus.

Latvian Prime Minister Krisjanis Karins said in a television interview: “I think that the events in Belarus are dramatically changing the situation. Now I do not see how we, as a country, can arrange a championship together with Belarus.”

IIHF head Rene Fasel (SUI) is steadfast: “We are following the situation, we are seeing protests after Lukashenko’s election as president, but it is not up to an international sports federation to make any political statements at this time.

“The 2014 IIHF World Championship in Belarus was a huge success – the attendance was over 600,000. The organisation of the tournament was great. We have no grounds to make a political statement on this subject. As we have decided, the tournament will be held from 21 May. Our position is quite clear. We are ready to go to Belarus.”

Skiing ● Yet another injury for American downhiller Steven Nyman, who is suffering through more frustration after tearing his right Achilles tendon during a training run at Mt. Hood in Oregon.

He wrote on Instagram: “Had surgery, but I am moving forward. I’ve been through this before and have full intention to comeback this season and compete through the next Olympics. Thank you to the @usskiteam medical team I have been working with, and others around the world sending me in the right direction.”

Weightlifting ● Congratulations to USA Weightlifting, which completed its month-long fundraising campaign with Snap! Raise at $71,292, surpassing its $70,000 goal.

The goal was “to help drive money into local clubs and ensure that they are able to keep their facilities open for the foreseeable future.” Said USA Weightlifting chief executive Phil Andrews:

“We are very grateful to over 600 of the individuals who donated and I’m sure they will take pleasure in the fact that the funds raised will go directly towards supporting our member clubs. It’s vital to work together during times of uncertainty and our partnership with Snap! Raise, through the innovation shown by Jessie Stone and her team, has shown the benefits of collaboration among likeminded organizations.”

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020+1 ● Among all the chatter about athlete pressure to eliminate Rule 50, prohibiting protests at the Olympic Games, a contrary opinion from Australia. Per Reuters:

“More than 80% of 496 respondents said protesting on the field of play would ‘detract from the performance or experience of athletes,’ according to the survey by the Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) Athletes’ Commission.”

According to AOC Athletes Commission chair Steve Hooker, the 2008 Olympic pole vault champ:

“It should be more read that the majority of athletes … their passion is their sport and their focus is on sport. And they want to go to the Olympic Games and focus on that. That doesn’t mean that other people, other members of the team, don’t feel differently.”

The story noted that “In the AOC survey, nearly 41% of athletes who responded said the Olympics were ‘not a place for athletes to publicly express their views.’ Some 40% believed in self-expression ‘depending on the circumstances,’ and 19% believed in self-expression ‘in any circumstances.’”

The International Olympic Committee’s Athletes’ Commission has asked national athlete commissions for advice and comment on Rule 50 before making a recommendation to the IOC Executive Board, possibly ahead of its meeting in October.

The Last Word ● Sad news from Lorsch, Germany, of the passing of one of the most influential Olympic journalists of all time, Karl-Heinz Huba.

Huba passed away on 12 August at age 90, less than two years after retiring from his Sport Intern newsletter, which he had published in multiple formats since 1968.

He was way ahead of any competitor for years, supplying news, quotes and perspective about the workings of the Olympic Movement while almost no one else was looking. Supported early in this effort by adidas chief exec Horst Dassler and later very close with International Olympic Committee chief Juan Antonio Samaranch, Huba was sometimes characterized as a “sore thumb,” but he had information no one else could get, for decades.

Always printed on bright, extra-thin, goldenrod paper, Huba’s issues were an immediate-read as soon as they arrived in the mail. He really had no competitors in the field until Ed Hula founded Around The Rings in 1992.

Huba changed – grudgingly – with the times, going to an e-mail delivery option in early 2008 and to e-mail delivery only in May 2009. He retired after the 31 October 2018 issue and handed the reins to Lausanne-based Richard Baker.

Born in 1930, Huba was well known as one of the top football writers in Germany, authoring more than a dozen strong-selling books on the sport in the 1960s and 1970s, including the highly-respected Fussball Weltgeschichte (“World Football History”) starting in 1973. In his early 20s, he was the head of the United Press sports department in Germany, then became the deputy sports editor of Die Welt in 1960. He became the editor of Sport-Illustrierte three years later.

The top of Huba’s final issue on 31 October of 2018:

LANE ONE: Why is World Athletics so timid about grabbing an opportunity to dominate the 2024 Paris Olympics?

Should World Athletics be asking to add a Half Marathon and other road events to the 2024 Paris Games? Yes! (Photo: World Athletics)

(★ Friends: Thank you! With 54 donations over the past few weeks, you have covered our half-yearly server and support costs. The next bill is coming, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Your interest and support are the reasons this site continues. ★)

At his best, British distance superstar Sebastian Coe was unbeatable, simply outrunning his competitors on the way to nine individual world records – indoors and out – at 800 m, 1,000 m, 1,500 m and the mile during his competitive career in the 1970s and 1980s.

But he also developed a keen tactical sense of how to set himself up for victory, and then to strike in major championships, as he did for his Olympic 1,500 m golds in 1980 and 1984. So as the President of World Athletics and now a member of the International Olympic Committee, it seems odd that Coe would champion a timid approach to the future of his sport in its biggest showcase.

True, the nicely presented World Athletics Strategy for Growth for 2020-23 incorporates a concept which has been a proven winner for cycling since 1927, with the introduction of a future World Road Championships around the World Half Marathon Championships and other events, and a World Off-Road Championships, including the World Cross Country Championships and possibly trail or mountain running.

And the plan for these events extends to having mass-participation races alongside the championship events, bringing the sport closer to the public.

So where is this future vision for Athletics at the Olympic Games?

At the end of last month, the World Athletics Council approved a plan for a single added event to the Paris 2024 program, a 20 km mixed-relay event with a maximum of 15 nations. Each team would include two men and two women, each of whom would run two legs of 2.5 km each.

It would mark a return for cross country to the Olympic Games exactly 100 years after it was last held, in Paris in 1924.

Nice, but that’s it?

Compare this tepid proposal to that being made by FINA, the international federation for aquatic sports, which is pounding the table – politely – for an additional 10 events (or more), including:

Artistic Swimming: Mixed Duet events (1 or more);
High Diving: 20 m for women and 27 m for men (2);
Swimming: 50 m backstoke for men and women;
Swimming: 50 m breaststroke for men and women;
Swimming: 50 m butterfly for men and women;
Swimming: Mixed 4×100 m freestyle relay (7).

FINA is also asking for more participants in open-water swimming and water polo, even though the International Olympic Committee is cutting total participants in the Games back to 10,500 from more than 11,000 expected in Tokyo in 2021.

This isn’t only about supporting more athletes in the Games and insiders know it. FINA officials point with pride to the IOC’s private, post-Games studies showing the massive combined in-person attendance at the Games for aquatic events and enormous number of television viewing hours offered by its four disciplines in swimming, artistic swimming, diving and water polo. FINA events are held every day of the Olympic program; track & field events have recently been held over only the final 10 days of the Games.

The new opportunity for World Athletics is the first-of-its-kind interest by the Paris 2024 organizers to have mass-participation programs in conjunction with at least the marathons, and possibly other events. In fact, this may be the signature innovation of the Paris Games, with thousands of people running on the same course – and possibly on the same days – as the men’s and women’s Olympic marathons are held.

Shouldn’t World Athletics take advantage of this and ask the IOC to include an extended program of events for 2024 which can also include complementary mass-participation opportunities? Clear candidates for new events for Athletics in Paris could include:

● 10 km road run for men and women
● Half Marathon for men and women

In addition, the long-suffering race walking events could get a significant upgrade if presented in conjunction with a non-competitive fitness walk event taking place before or after:

● 20 km walk for men and women (coupled with a 5 km fitness walk)
● 50 km walk for men and women (coupled with a 10 km fitness walk)

All of these events should take place during the first week of the Games, before any of the track & field competitions are held. This will bring more attention to Athletics during the entire length of the Games instead of only in the second week and offer considerably more possibilities for public participation in the event … and worldwide television viewing.

Best of all, the four new road events listed above (and one new walk) can be accommodated by just a minor revision to the size of the existing fields in the other events on the track & field program (currently 1,900 total athletes).

And if desired, the cross-country relay could be included as well – also during the first week – with competitors coming from those already entered in other events (as is done by most countries that enter the 4×100 m and 4×400 m relays).

Having cross country back in the Paris Games would be nice, but it’s not the kind of bold strike that Coe – and many of his fellow World Athletics Council members – was known for during his running days. Leveraging the new thinking of the Paris 2024 organizers and the IOC’s interest – concurrent with that of World Athletics – to better promote personal fitness and a healthy lifestyle can allow the sport to expand to all 16 days of the Games and to welcome future Olympians who can walk and/or run in the footsteps of those participating in the Games of the XXXIII Olympiad.

More great sprinting from Monday at the Star Athletics Sprint Showcase in Monteverde, Florida, including a new world -leading mark from Kenny Bednarek (USA).

After exploding on the scene with a high-altitude 19.82 win at the National Junior College nationals in 2019, Bednarek, 21, was injured later in the year, but has come all the way back with a win on Monday in PR of 19.80. He finished well ahead of Canada’s Andre DeGrasse (20.31) and Kyree King (USA: 20.54).

Trayvon Bromell (USA) continued to show that he’s to be taken seriously once again, winning a wind-aided 100 m in 9.87 (+2.5 m/s), after winning his heat in 9.99. Justin Gatlin was second in the final (10.02w), with Bednarek third (10.02w, after a lifetime best of 10.09 in the heats).

The 2019 NCAA sprint sensation from LSU, Sha’Carri Richardson, is also running well again, winning the women’s 100 m in 10.83 with the wind just over the allowable at 2.1 m/s. Richardson set a season’s best of 10.95 in the heats (no. 3 in the world for 2020) and then won the 200 m in 22.00 (also no. 3 in the world for 2020), ahead of 400 m star Shakima Wimbley at 22.88.

Pretty impressive!

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Lyles featured in Diamond League opener; Jakobsen out of coma; another Nassar victim asks to join the proceedings

U.S. sprint superstar Noah Lyles

(★ Friends: Thank you! With 53 donations over the past few weeks, you have covered our half-yearly server and support costs. The next bill is coming, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Thank you to all of our readers; your interest and support is the reason this site continues. ★)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Athletics ● It may be hard to believe, but it appears that the annual Herculis meet in the Principality of Monaco is on for Friday, with an all-star line-up led by American sprint star Noah Lyles ready to go.

Although there have been faux Wanda Diamond League meets in Oslo and Zurich, this is a real track meet, with live coverage in the U.S. on the NBC Olympic Channel beginning at 2 p.m. Friday afternoon. Among the attractions:

Men/200 m: Lyles ran 19.65 on this track in 2018 – his second-fastest ever – and appears to be in brilliant shape. Something special this time? He should be in a happy place with his brother Josephus (20.24 this season) running, as well as old rivals like former World Champion Ramil Guliyev (TUR: 19.76 best) and Britain’s Adam Gemili (19.97).

Men/800 m: World Champion Donavan Brazier is already the world leader at 1:43.84; can anyone challenge him? Kenyan Ferguson Rotich (1:42.54 lifetime best) and Amel Tuka (BIH) will try, as well upcoming American star Bryce Hoppel (1:44.25).

Men/1,500 m: We finally get to see the usually-unbeatable Tim Cheruiyot (KEN) lock up with two of the three Ingebrigtsens Filip (3:30.01 lifetime best) and Jakob (3:30.16). Is Ethiopia’s Yomif Kejelcha in good enough shape to spoil the party?

Men/110 m Hurdles: World champ Grant Holloway of the U.S. is in, along with Spain’s star Orlando Ortega, France’s Pascale Martinot-Lagarde and 2020 world leader Andy Pozzi of Great Britain.

Men/400 m Hurdles: A small field of five, but anytime World Champion Karsten Warholm (NOR) is running, it’s worth watching.

Men/Pole Vault: Another showdown between world-record holder Mondo Duplantis of Sweden (via Louisiana) and World Champion Sam Kendricks of the U.S. Duplantis is the world leader at 5.94 m (19-5 3/4).

Women/1,000 m: Intriguing match-up with Britain’s Laura Muir, Kenya’s Faith Kipyegon, Uganda’s Winnie Nanyondo and American Raevyn Rogers.

Women/5,000 m: World 1,500 m and 10,000 m Champion Sifan Hassan (NED) will cross swords once again with Kenya’s Hellen Obiri, the 2017-19 World Champion at 5,000 m. There are many more stars, including Germany’s Konstanze Klosterhalfen and American Shannon Rowbury.

The final event, the men’s Steeple, was to be another match-up between Morocco’s Soufiane El Bakkali, the 2017 World Champs silver medalist and arch-rival (and Olympic and World champ) Conseslus Kipruto, but the latter is out with the coronavirus. The crowd – such as there is; it was reported that up to 5,000 will be allowed – will cheer El Bakkali against Kenyan Leonard Bett and Getnet Wale (ETH), among others.

The Paavo Nurmi Games was held – really – in Turku, Finland today (11th), with world-leading performances from Britain’s Pozzi (13.17) in the 110 m hurdles, Germany’s Johannes Vetter in the javelin (91.49 m/300-2) and Dutch hurdler Nadine Visser (12.68).

There was some fast sprinting in Jamaica last Saturday (8th), where Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce won the 100 m in a world-leading 10.87 and Elaine Thompson-Helah running 10.88 in a separate section.

Sweden’s Daniel Stahl extended his world lead in the discus with a monster toss of 71.37 m (234-2) in Sollentuna (SWE) on Monday. Stahl has had a remarkable 11 competitions in 2020, winning 10, with two meets beyond 70 m already.

The soap opera which is the Russian Athletics Federation continued on Monday (10th) with the announcement that Yevgeny Yurchenko, who resigned as federation president on 13 July, would stay on until 30 November when a new president will be elected.

Coming up on Saturday (15th) is the deadline for World Athletics to receive the $6.31 million it is owed for fines and expenses from the Russian federation. Russian sports minister Oleg Matytsin has promised that it will be paid by that date.

Cycling ● The best news of the weekend was that Dutch star Fabio Jakobsen came out of an inducted coma following his brutal crash at the finish of the opening stage of the Tour de Pologne on 5 August:

“The hospital in Sosnowiec, southern Poland, said that Jakobsen will have to go through a long rehabilitation process, but his condition is good and he does not show any neurological symptoms.”

The hospital medical director said he believed that Jakobsen, 23, can return to the sport.

In the meantime, the Tour de Pologne did continue, with the hilly fourth stage determining the winner. Belgium’s Remco Evenpoel climbed from 19th to first by winning the stage by 1:48 over Dane Jakob Fuglsang and Simon Yates (GBR) and they finished 1-2-3 in the final standings.

For Evenpoel, 20, it’s his first UCI World Tour multi-stage race victory and his fourth win in four events this season; the other three were at lower-level events in Argentina, Portugal and Spain.

The 111th edition of the famed Milan-Sanremo race was another showcase for Belgian star Wout van Aert, who followed up his win at Strade Bianche in and around Siena (ITA), with a lean to at the finish to edge France’s Julien Alaphilippe.

This was a long race at 305 km, but it came down to a sprint between van Aert and Alaphilippe, with the Frenchman attacking off the final climb and van Aert trying to keep close. But van Aert had the lead going into the final straight and just held off Alaphilippe for another win after an exhausting 7:16:09 of riding!

The UCI World Tour continues this week with the Criterium du Dauphine, a five-stage race which usually a preview of the Tour de France, which starts on 29 August. On Saturday comes another of the “monument” races in cycling, the 114th Il Lombardia, from Bergamo to Como.

Gymnastics ● A hearing will be held on 26 August at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana to determine whether to allow a new claimant into the USA Gymnastics bankruptcy case.

Terin Humphrey, now 33, was a two-time silver medalist at the 2004 Olympic Games in the Team event and on the Uneven Bars, declared on a 30 July filing that she was abused by Larry Nassar during a 2002 meet in Virginia during an examination for a hip injury.

Although the filing date for all abuse claims was 29 April 2019, Humphrey’s motion states:

“Although Claimant received notice of the Bankruptcy and of the opportunity to file a claim in the Bankruptcy prior to the Bar Date, she did not do so because it was only within the past month that Claimant came to recall and realize that she had been abused by Nassar.”

Humphrey’s motion further declares that during and after her recent pregnancy – she gave birth in January 2020 – she suffered “distressing memories and flashbacks” and “first began to realize that she may have suffered abuse by Nassar” in June of 2020.

The motion also asks for her to be placed in Class 6A for elite athletes, which would entitle her under the currently-proposed plan to $1.25 million in settlement funds.

While Humphrey’s motion will be heard, discussions should now be underway between mediators for the committee of survivors – the negotiating entity for those alleging abuse by Nassar – and USA Gymnastics, the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee and its insurers. A hearing on a potential settlement plan is currently scheduled for 9 October.

U.S. National Governing Bodies ● The “Giving Games,” a donation portal for 21 of the U.S. National Governing Bodies finished its primary fund-raising effort during what would have been the period of the 2020 Tokyo Games, ending on 9 August.

Created in collaboration with the Colorado-based CFC Collective fund-raising consultancy, the Giving Games allowed (and still allows) individuals to donate to one of 21 NGBs, including both Olympic and Paralympic sports. While the total amount of donations has not been disclosed, the Giving Games site did show the top donations to each sport. The top 10 individual donations:

$36,240 to the U.S. Equestrian Team by an anonymous donor
$35,000 to USA Bobsled & Skeleton by Oscar Tang & Agnes Hsu-Tang
$10,000 to USA Bobsled & Skeleton by Mac Riley
$10,000 to USA Bobsled & Skeleton by Sherry Cushman
$10,000 to the U.S. Equestrian Team by the Ziegler Family Foundation
$10,000 to USA Judo by Joe and Enid Ragan
$7,500 to the American Canoe Assn. by Sara Perkovic
$5,540 to USA Artistic Swimming by Chris Leahy
$5,100 to the U.S. Equestrian Team by Karen Long Dwight
$5,100 to USA Pentathlon by Neal Linthicum

The largest total to a single sport might have been the $72,480 donated to the U.S. Equestrian Foundation, which also had the largest single donation (be far).

USA Swimming, in conjunction with the USA Swimming Foundation, announced a second round of grants to local clubs totaling more than $1.52 million.

The federation noted that “722 clubs requested and received funding through the program, totaling more than $3 million thanks to the USA Swimming Foundation” and that 59 USA Swimming Local Swimming Committees also made grants, bringing the total amount of support to local organization to more than $9 million so far.

At the same time, USA Weightlifting has been busy with its own, unique program of fund-raising to help its member clubs during the pandemic, in collaboration with SnapRaise.

Chief executive Phil Andrews reported that the $66,000 goal has nearly been reached, with the rest of today (11th) remaining. At posting time, an impressive $65,507 had been received!

At the BuZZer ● Long-time sponsorship guru Michael Payne (GBR) tweeted on Monday (10th):

“Major news – surprised not more coverage to this breaking story. China’s Vivo pulls out of their $330m Indian cricket sponsorship due to China / India border tensions. Don’t ever recall a similar case sponsor and politics! Hold tight”

Vivo is a Chinese smartphone maker and title sponsor of cricket’s Indian Premier League. The Times of India reported that “had retained the IPL sponsorship rights for 2018-2022 for nearly 22 billion rupees ($293 million).”

A member of the IPL council “said Vivo had withdrawn partly because of the weak business environment due to the Covid-19 pandemic and because of widespread anti-China sentiment in India following a border clash.” IPL officials expected Vivo to be replaced quickly, for this season at least.

LANE ONE: Track & field ($10.5 million), ski & snowboard ($9.3 million) and swimming ($7.4 million) biggest recipients of USOPC cash & services in 2019

(★ Friends: Thank you! With 52 donations over the past few weeks, you have covered our half-yearly server and support costs. The next bill is coming, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Thank you to all of our readers; your interest and support is the reason this site continues. ★)

The trove of financial data released last week by the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee included a novel new report called the “Sport Benefits Statement.” This compilation displayed the total amount of money – direct and indirect – poured into each U.S. National Governing Body in 2019. The components included:

(1) High Performance Programs
This includes direct athlete stipends, prize money given for Pan American Games performances, coaching education, health insurance and medical services, sports science and “High Performance Grants,” a sum given to each NGB for athlete support, coaching support, travel to competitions and training camps.

(2) Olympic & Paralympic Competitions
This was, in 2019, travel and support for the Pan American Games in Lima, Peru.

(3) Athlete Training Facilities
This is for athlete stays, based on an averaged daily user rate, at the USOPC Training Centers in Colorado Springs, Colorado or Lake Placid, New York, or the facilities at the former USOPC training center in Chula Vista, California, or the Utah Olympic Legacy sites in and around Salt Lake City, Utah.

(4) Athlete & NGB Foundational Programs
Covers administrative support and NGB rent if on the USOPC campus, athlete career education, grassroots coaching and development programs and collegiate program outreach.

(5) Team USA Media & Promotion
Communications support, including public relations, digital and Web programming, licensing and international relations grants for advancing U.S. candidatures within the International Federations.

As it turns out, the amounts provided to some of the NGBs were far beyond the direct-grant amounts that are reported on the USOPC’s Form 990 tax return. There were 61 Sport Benefits Statements issued; for the 33 permanent summer Olympic NGBs and eight permanent winter Olympic NGBs, in order of total support received:

● $10,485,866: Track & Field: $3,796,780 direct; $6,689,086 additional
● $7,435,980: Swimming: $3,548,924 direct; $3,887,056 additional
● $5,000,793: Wrestling: $1,791,846 direct; $3,208,947 additional
● $4,872,696: Volleyball: $2,038,587 direct; $2,834,109 additional
● $4,252,369: Gymnastics: $2,227,033 direct; $2,025,336 additional

● $4,036,847: Rowing: $1,704,229 direct; $2,332,618 additional
● $3,870,948: Cycling: $2,211,900 direct; $1,659,048 additional
● $3,514,053: Rugby: $1,349,481 direct; $2,164,572 additional
● $3,294,415: Shooting: $1,950,373 direct; $1,344,042 additional
● $2,965,313: Triathlon: $1,162,334 direct; $1,802,979 additional

● $2,758,203: Boxing: $1,047,588 direct; $1,710,615 additional
● $2,648,440: Water Polo: $1,375,391 direct; $1,273,049 additional
● $2,115,139: Archery: $868,428 direct; $1,246,711 additional
● $1,975,922: Sailing: $1,356,198 direct; $619,724 additional
● $1,975,071: Fencing: $1,052,920 direct; $922,151 additional

● $1,868,937: Hockey: $1,096,307 direct; $772,630 additional
● $1,847.210: Basketball: $1,295,890 direct; $551,320 additional
● $1,771,857: Equestrian: $1,358,940 direct; $412,917 additional
● $1,611,337: Diving: $1,095,908 direct; $515,429 additional
● $1,339,490: Judo: $788,618 direct; $550,872 additional

● $1,295,594: Football: $750,000 direct; $545,594 additional
● $1,188,257: Softball: $626,876 direct; $561,381 additional
● $1,156,248: Taekwondo: $673,050 direct; $483,198 additional
● $630,266: Weightlifting: $431,731 direct; $198,535 additional
● $613,743: Handball: $270,893 direct; $342,850 additional

● $544,237: Table Tennis: $317,767 direct; $226,470 additional
● $365,821: Canoeing: $171,280 direct; $194,541 additional
● $322,042: Tennis: $50,000 direct; $272,042 additional
● $305,518: Artistic Swim: $195,941 direct; $109,577 additional
● $280,226: Badminton $137,172 direct; $143,054 additional

● $274,082: Modern Pent.: $88,003 direct; $186,079 additional
● $62,712: Golf: $28,400 direct; $34,312 additional
● $0: Baseball (yes, really: $0)

Winter:

● $9,307,196: Ski & Snowboard: $6,315,000 direct; $2,992,196 additional
● $3,854,179: Bob & Skeleton: $2,066,163 direct; $1,788,016 additional
● $3,055,466: Ice Hockey: $1,649,251 direct; $1,406,215 additional
● $2,784,665: Figure Skating: $1,307,741 direct; $1,476,924 additional
● $2,540,944: Speedskating: $1,896,212 direct; $644,732 additional
● $2,451,746: Luge: $1,335,952 direct; $1,115,794 additional
● $1,792,471: Biathlon: $1,048,439 direct; $744,032 additional
● $1,651,926: Curling: $1,186,960 direct; $464,966 additional

There were no surprises in the top five summer sports receiving USOPC support; these are where the U.S. has been strong and brings home medals in bunches in almost every Games. Beyond these, however, few would have guessed that rowing would receive the sixth-most support, or that rugby, shooting and triathlon would rank 8-9-10.

There are plenty of critics of the USOPC Training Centers in Colorado Springs and Lake Placid, and arrangements with the former USOPC facility in Chula Vista and the Utah Olympic Legacy facilities in and around Salt Lake City. But these were widely used by many NGBs; the highest bills – reported using an averaged daily rate for each site – were run up by:

● $1,788,125: Wrestling: Colorado Springs
● $956,731: Track & Field: Chula Vista & Colorado Springs
● $947,310: Rugby: Chula Vista
● $843,798: Bob & Skeleton: Lake Placid and Salt Lake City
● $683,795: Boxing: Colorado Springs
● $546,364: Archery: Chula Vista
● $526,975: Luge: Colorado Springs, Lake Placid & Salt Lake City
● $540,800: Gymnastics: Colorado Springs & Lake Placid
● $491,235: Ski & Snowboard: Lake Placid & Salt Lake City
● $450,340: Biathlon: Lake Placid & Salt Lake City

There were six more NGBs who ran up bills of more than a quarter-million: rowing ($369,279), shooting ($346,050), cycling ($344,339), figure skating ($282.770), triathlon ($263,340) and basketball ($250,515). That’s 16 of 41 at a quarter-million or more and swimming was at $249,720.

Significant other foot-stamping, hand-wringing and tearing of hair is being recorded – as always – by those who claim that the financial statements and Form 990 details show that a “total” of just $18.48 million out of $248.31 million in functional expenses was given to athletes in 2019 (these figures from Form 990).

Nice try, but no. However, the USOPC could help itself with a little more effort.

The actual amount paid for “direct athlete support,” including cash payments, health insurance, education tuition and medical services was $31.88 million. Last I checked, I had to pay for all of those things out-of-pocket, so they count just like cash as far as I am concerned.

Another $76.10 million was distributed to the NGBs, and a significant amount of that money went to athletes through distribution programs operated by those federations. The USOPC should obtain the information on distributions to athletes by NGBs and publish a separate tally of the total count of athletes supported and monies expended to provide a fuller picture.

One of the elements included in U.S. Senate Bill S. 2330 that passed last week and the accompanying House bill just introduced is a commission to study the USOPC’s operations. If this commission comes into being, it will be urged to take up the question of not only what the USOPC is doing, but how it is doing it.

Long accused of inefficiency, the USOPC’s 2019 Form 990 lists 567 employees and the financial statements show these people cost $54.10 million, with another $35.06 million spent for outside services such as accounting, legal and fundraising. One observer with long experience suggested the same work could be done with as little as 150 people. Others would simply like to know what all those people do.

The Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act (here) allows, but does not require that the USOPC recognize a National Governing Body for each sport on the Olympic, Paralympic or Pan American Games program. Would the USOPC save money, time and people by simply absorbing some of the smaller NGBs? Most of the NGBs? Those NGBs which cannot function without USOPC subsidies?

If the review commission required by S. 2330 survives review in the House and a bill actually becomes law, it will be fascinating to see whether it will insist on a flatter USOPC/NGB administrative structure to try and save money.

Then again, we are talking about a federal commission; can anyone really expect more efficiency?

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: Exclusive ~ U.S. to try for World Univ. Games in 2027; drama in Russia over drive to oust RUSADA head; USOPC bill now in House

The Winter World University Games is coming to Lake Placid in 2023; will the summer WUG return to the U.S. in 2027?

(★ Friends: So grateful for your continuing support, with 52 donations over the past few weeks that covered our half-yearly server and support bills. More bills are coming, of course, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Thank you! ★)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Miller Time ● Veteran British Olympic observer David Miller considers whether a postponed 2020+1 Olympic Games in Tokyo may be devalued by the absence of countries where the coronavirus may not yet be under control. Like the United States!

World University Games ● The U.S. has had a mostly-disinterested relationship with the World University Games, established in 1959 and designed to be for athletes who are in college or recently completed student work and are between 17-25 years old.

That appears to be changing.

The U.S. Olympic Committee (now Olympic & Paralympic Committee) supported American participation in the WUG in the 1990s and up to about 2003, primarily with support staffing, travel and uniforms, but decided the event was not a core program and U.S. participation is now in the hands of the U.S.-International University Sport Federation (US-IUSF).

Longtime chair Gary Cunningham, the former UCLA basketball coach from 1978-79 and later athletic director at the University of California, Santa Barbara, retired at head of the US-IUSF and recently-retired UCLA athletic director Dan Guerrero has assumed the lead role.

Over lunch on a patio in a rare open restaurant in Los Angeles, Guerrero explained that he is looking for a more active role for the US-IUSF in the future: “We’re excited about what’s coming up and bringing the World University Games back to the U.S.” He noted:

● Despite the pandemic, the US-IUSF is planning to field at team at the 2021 Winter World University Games in Lucerne, Switzerland from 21-31 January. This is especially important since the 2023 Winter World University Games will be held in Lake Placid, New York, from 12-22 January.

It’s only the second time the Winter WUG will be held in the U.S. The first was also in Lake Placid, back in 1972, with 410 athletes competing in seven sports. The last event, in Krasnoyarsk (RUS) in 2019, attracted 3,000 athletes competing in 11 sports.

● The 2021 World University Games is scheduled for Chengdu, China from 18-29 August, and in Kazan (RUS) for 2023. The last WUG, in Naples (ITA) drew 5,971 athletes, but as many as 12,885 have attended for the 2015 WUG in Gwangju (KOR).

● Guerrero said that interest in the WUG is increasing, with a possible host city in Germany for 2025 and the U.S. for 2027.

A U.S.-based World University Games would be pretty interesting in 2027, one year prior to the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles. The U.S. hosted a summer WUG only once before, in Buffalo, New York in 1993, with 3,582 athletes competing in 12 sports.

The current program includes 15 required sports and up to three optional sports. Guerrero indicated that preliminary discussions are underway about a bid city or area.

(The best choices would be areas with large universities already in place that can offer athlete housing and competition and training facilities. Obvious options would be the “Research Triangle” area of Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, which hosted the 1987 U.S. Olympic Festival; Houston, Texas, which constructed an excellent bid to be the U.S. candidate city for the 2012 Olympic Games and perhaps also Austin, Texas, site of the University of Texas and an increasingly popular site for conferences and events, or Indianapolis, site of the 1987 Pan American Games.)

To get all of this done, Guerrero has a building job on his hands. He and Secretary General Delise O’Meally, Executive Director of the Institute for Sport & Social Justice at the University of Central Florida – both volunteers – operate on an annual budget of only about $60,000, enough for paying dues to the International University Sports Federation (FISU) and travel to some meetings. But Guerrero was a prolific fund-raiser – in the hundreds of millions – during his 18 years as Director of Athletics at UCLA and will look to expand the US-IUSF profile.

The FISU, under the leadership of Russian Oleg Matytsin, has also shown more vigor since his election in 2015. In fact, his efforts were noticed nationally and he was named as Russian Minister of Sport on 21 January of this year. Guerrero believes Matytsin will remain as the head of FISU and has ambitious plans to make the organization more visible within the worldwide Olympic Movement.

U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee ● As S. 2330, the Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020, was making its way to the U.S. Senate floor for unanimous approval on Tuesday (4th), a companion bill was finally introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.

H.R. 7881, To amend the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act to provide for congressional oversight of the board of directors of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee and to protect amateur athletes from emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and for other purposes, was introduced on 31 July by Ted Lieu (D-California), with five co-sponsors: John Curtis (R-Utah), Dianna DeGette (D-Colorado), Susan Brooks (R-Indiana), Ann Kuster (D-New Hampshire) and Michael Burgess (R-Texas).

The bill was sent to the House Judiciary Committee and to the House Committee on Education and Labor. Lieu is a member of the Judiciary Committee, but none of the five co-sponsors are on either committee.

While the USOPC has made many of the changes requested during the four Senate sub-committee hearings that led to the filing of S. 2330, there are significant problems with this bill and the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act of 2019 (S. 259). In the Moran-Blumenthal bill (S. 2330), the Congress would have the power to – by resolution – to decertify a U.S. National Governing Body or to dismiss the entire Board of the USOPC. Both of those actions would be contrary to the Olympic Charter and invite a suspension of the USOPC by the International Olympic Committee.

Let’s see what happens in the House.

Doping ● As if there wasn’t enough drama already in Russia concerning doping in sport, the Supervisory Board of the Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) recommended the dismissal of the head of that agency, Yuriy Ganus, to the Russian National Olympic Committee.

Ganus has been given high marks for revamping RUSADA into a working and competent anti-doping organization, and allegations against him for financial mismanagement over taxi fares and English lessons – among other things – have left the World Anti-Doping Agency considerably concerned.

The Russian Olympic Committee and Russian Paralympic Committee commissioned an inquiry into RUSADA finances and came up with conclusions of mismanagement against Ganus. On 5 August (Wednesday), WADA issued a statement noting:

“Today’s recommendation has presented further very important questions as to the validity of the legal process that has been followed and the motives behind the recommendation. …

“It is a critical element of the World Anti-Doping Code that National Anti-Doping Organizations, such as RUSADA, remain safe from any interference of the relevant National Olympic and Paralympic Committees in their operational decisions and activities in order to conduct their work effectively. This is why WADA’s independent Compliance Review Committee (CRC), when it issued its recommendation to declare RUSADA non-compliant with the Code that was unanimously endorsed by the Agency’s Executive Committee on 9 December 2019, made it a condition of RUSADA’s eventual reinstatement that WADA remains satisfied that RUSADA’s independence is being respected and there is no improper outside interference with its operations.”

Ganus, for his part, has been strident in condemning the allegations on Twitter and last Sunday issued a remarkable three-panel tweet (in Russian and English) which included this:

“The root of our problems lies not in the western countries unlike it has been portrayed. The problems are internal. The greatest fear is the fear of change, fear to break the old disastrous patterns and methods. The tasks related to sports, se by the Russian President, are not accomplished and can not be accomplished because of the corrupt and inefficient old approaches and methods. …

“In a considerable part of our sports, the need for changes in attitude to doping, and the plausibility of such changes are either not understood or underestimated, or deliberately ignored.”

In the meantime, Russia has been slapped with a four-year sanction by WADA which could keep it out of the 2021-22-24 Olympic Games; its appeal will be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in November.

Athletics ● The London Marathon announced Thursday that it will hold only the elite-athlete portion of its 2020 race on 4 October, on a course that will be devoid of spectators.

Event Director Hugh Brasher’s announcement included:

“Despite all our efforts, the fantastic support from all of our partners and the progress that has been made on planning for the return of smaller mass participation events that are not on the roads, it has not been possible to go ahead with a mass socially distanced walk or run.

“In parallel with the work on the plans for the socially distanced mass event, we had a team working on planning the elite races for men, women and wheelchair athletes in a biosphere environment in St James’s Park and another team creating a truly inspiring Virgin Money London Marathon which means participants across the UK and abroad can still be part of The 40th Race from their home or wherever they might be on 4 October.”

The date for the 2021 race was also moved to 3 October, “to give the best chance for the mass race to return.”

The Athletics Integrity Unit has been busy, issuing bans to Ukraine’s Nataliia Krol for 20 months from 16 January 2020 and to Turkish steepler Gulcan Mingir, for two years from 3 February 2020.

Krol was hit for use of a prohibited substance (hydrochlorothiazide, a diruretic used for high blood pressure) and Mingir for DHCMT (the steroid Turinabol) in a re-test of her 2012 specimen given at the London Olympic Games.

As Nataliia Pryshchepa, she won the European 800 m titles in 2016 and 2018 with a lifetime best of 1:58.60 in 2016. Her last competition was in October, 2019.

The now-retired Mingir was the 2012 European steeple champ and was a 2012 Olympian in that event (eliminated in the heats). Her marks from 4 August 2012 to 4 August 2014 were erased, eliminating her Olympic results and her World University Games victory in 2013.

The clock is ticking on the 15 August deadline for payment of the $6.31 million in fines and costs due to World Athletics from the Russian Athletics Federation. At the same time, a detailed plan for reinstatement is due to be filed by the end of August, by the RusAF Reinstatement Commission.

This body consists of Russian Anti-Doping Agency, the Russian Olympic Committee and Russian sports ministry, and at least two athletes, and is expected to meet for the second time on Friday, 7 August.

Said acting RusAF President Alexei Plotnikov, “We have enormous work ahead. We held the first reinstatement commission meeting on July 27, when the decision was made to draft a detailed plan for RusAF to steer clear out of the crisis and submit it to World Athletics for approval. We will discuss the draft of this vital document at the second meeting, which should take place August 7. We will also talk about all the recommendations that were voiced at [the World Athletics] Council meeting.”

If this plan is not submitted on time, it could trigger a decision for formal expulsion of the Russian Athletics Federation.

Cycling ● A horrific crash marred the finish of the first stage of the Tour de Pologne, with Dutch rider Fabio Jakobsen declared the winner, but suffering severe injuries due to interference in the final sprint by fellow Dutch sprinter Dylan Groenewegen.

On the downhill sprint finish at the end of the 195.8 kg kick-off leg from Stadion Slaski to Katowice, Groenewegen (who rides for the Jumbo-Visma team) moved from the center of the road to the right side. According to CyclingNews, “His actions forced Jakobsen into the barriers at high-speed with the Dutch national champion smashing through the roadside safety equipment and into a race official who was left unconscious.”

Jakobsen, who rides for Deceuninck-Quick Step, was taken to a hospital and underwent 5 1/2 hours of facial reconstructive surgery and was in intensive care in an induced coma overnight. On Twitter, Groenewegen – who suffered a broken collarbone – wrote:

“I hate what happened yesterday. I can’t find the words to describe how sorry I am for Fabio and others who have been crashed or hit. At the moment, the health of Fabio is the most important thing. I think about him constantly.”

The race reported that the injured official was in stable condition.

Dane Mads Pedersen won the second stage on Thursday and the race continues through Sunday.

Figure Skating ● The French Ministry of Sports stated that more than 20 coaches working with French skaters are the subject of accusations into abuse, harassment or violence.

The inquiry was launched after multi-time French champion Sarah Abitbol alleged sex abuse by her coach in the early 1990s. The ministry stated that “The volume of cases identified is indicative of practices and behaviours that have been replicated through generations of coaches. It is unparalleled internationally.”

The report will be forwarded to the government prosecutors in Paris.

The International Skating Union confirmed on Monday that its Grand Prix season of six competitions will be held – maybe – but with only competitors from the host country, skaters training in the country where the event will take place and skaters in nearby countries who can meet the requirements for entry in the applicable country.

The results will not count for world rankings, or for qualification for ISU Championship events. The Grand Prix season is slated to start on 23 October at Skate America in Las Vegas.

Short Track Skating ● A unique milestone for the sport as Eddy Alvarez, who grew up in Miami as a roller-blader and later became a U.S. Olympian in Short Track in 2014, was called up to the Miami Marlins of Major League Baseball.

Alvarez won a silver medal in the 5,000 m relay in Sochi in 2014 and competed in the 500 m (finishing 31st), 1,000 m (11th) and 1,500 m (19th). He then turned his attention to baseball and after six minor-league seasons, he joined Miami this week as an infielder.

He debuted on Wednesday in Baltimore against the Orioles in a 1-0 Marlins win, going 0-3 and handling one chance defensively at second base.

Swimming ● Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis could be the site of the 2024 U.S. Olympic Swimming Trials, with a temporary pool placed on the existing football field.

The Indianapolis Star reported that a bid is being developed for USA Swimming to bring the Trials back to Indy, which has hosted the event six times previously, most recently in 2000.

The story noted that St. Louis is also interested in bidding and Omaha, the site of the 2008-12-16-21 Trials, will almost certainly request the event again. The CenturyLink Center held about 14,000 for swimming in 2016, but Lucas Oil Stadium would be able to host more than 70,000 for each session.

Like the NCAA men’s basketball Final Four, however, those swimmers will look awfully small from the upper reaches of a football stadium. A decision on the 2024 Trials host could be made as early as this December.

The Last Word ● Naturally, the amazing 50 m swim by U.S. distance superstar Katie Ledecky with a glass of chocolate milk on her head has spawned imitators.

Australia’s Susie O’Neill, 47, who won eight Olympic medals as a freestyler and butterfly swimmer from 1992-2000, got into the act on Wednesday, trying to balance a glass of beer on her head for 25 m.

She almost got there, but the glass fell off just before the finish as O’Neill turned her head slightly. Maybe she should have used a snorkel for breaking as Ledecky did!

Although some of the beer fell off into the water, O’Neill gulped down what was left so it wouldn’t go to waste!

LANE ONE: U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee annual report says to Congress: “Hey, we heard you!” but is it too late?

(★ Friends: You did it! Thank you! Happy to report a total of 51 donations over the past few weeks that has covered our half-yearly server and support bills. Wow! The next bill is coming, so if you would like to help, please donate here. Thank you to all of our readers; your interest and support is the reason this site goes on. ★)

First came the thunder, followed a day later by the lightning. The question is whether anyone got hurt, or will be.

On Monday, the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee released its largest-ever package of organizational and financial reports, which chief executive Sarah Hirshland said showed “2019 was a year of remarkable progress in which we listened to our community, changed our culture and implemented a strategic plan that will allow us to better support, serve and partner with all the stakeholders.”

This is quite true and the level of detail was impressive, but Hirshland skipped mentioning one of the main targets of the package, the U.S. Congress.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate passed – without any dissenting votes – S. 2330, the “Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athlete Act” introduced in 2019 by Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut). The product of a series of Senate sub-committee hearings, the bill as drafted requires a lengthy series of oversight measures by the USOPC over itself and the U.S. National Governing Bodies, more enforcement against athlete abuse, more funding for the U.S. Center for SafeSport, more athlete representation and a possible “legislative mechanisms by which Congress can dissolve the Board of the U.S. Olympic Committee and decertify NGBs.”

But in fact a lot of the requests made in the bill and during the four hearings held to produce it have already been integrated into the USOPC programming. The organization’s “Impact Report” – formerly the “Annual Report” – showcased these items strongly and emphasized their “co-creation” by all of the stakeholders:

Priorities

The report noted four “strategic priorities”:

(1) “[C]reating a better experience for our athletes;”

(2) “[I]mproving the effectiveness of all the organizations that serve our athletes;”

(3) “[E]stablishing an athletes-first culture;” and

(4) “[P]reparing for the awesome, transformational opportunity represented by hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games in LA in 2028.”

Athlete support

“Approximately 82% of the USOPC’s budget has a direct impact on its mission of supporting athletes via a variety of programs for both athletes and their National Governing Bodies. In addition to (1) performance grants and rewards, additional support is provided in the form of (2) training facilities, (3) sports medicine and science, (4) coaching education, (5) health insurance, (6) promotional opportunities, (7) education and career services, (8) outfitting and travel, and (9) athlete safety, well-being and (10) anti-doping programming.” (Numbering added.)

This is a direct response to the many complaints that the USOPC spends only a tiny percentage of its funding on athletes. In fact, an extraordinary effort was made to identify athlete-support funding, not only at the USOPC level, but in 61 first-time “Sport Benefit” reports, which detail both the direct-grant and support-service finding by the USOPC to the U.S. National Governing Bodies for Olympic and Paralympic sports.

The breakdown of USOPC spending was specifically noted as

“Eighty-three percent of our quad resources go toward programs and activities that directly support Team USA athletes—while 10% is invested in generating revenue through fundraising and commercial activities and another 7% on general administration.”

(Yes, readers, there’s a 1% discrepancy there, but let’s get on with the main themes.)

High-performance support

The report noted that for 2019, “$83 million was distributed directly to athletes, National Governing Bodies and High Performance Management Organizations. Funds given to NGBs and HPMOs were utilized for elite athlete programming, such as training camps, coaching and travel to international competition” and

“The USOPC increased its Athlete Performance Pool to 1,484 athletes, expanding the number of athletes qualified for monthly monetary stipends to supplement the training and competition resources provided. Additional support is offered via Operation Gold—which totaled $3.4 million in payments to 595 athletes for their top finishes in each sport’s most competitive senior international competition of 2019—and Elite Athlete Health Insurance benefits, which amounted to $7.3 million in support to 1,326 athletes.”

At the USOPC training centers in Colorado Springs and Lake Placid, some 16,429 athletes in 1,072 programs were supported during 2019.

Support for athlete inquiries, legal matter and safety

One of the items specifically requested in the Senate hearings was a USOPC-funded program of athlete assistance in legal, protest and safety areas. This has been met with an expansion of what used to be called the Athlete Ombudsman. In 2019:

“The [Office of the Athlete Ombuds] responded to approximately 1,200 requests for assistance, with the most prominent areas of inquiry being team selection, anti-doping and athlete safety issues. The office has continued to improve its visibility, resulting in an increase of access to dispute resolution opportunities prior to formal proceedings and a reduction of the accumulation of costs and fees for athletes. The office also distributed more than $65,000 in legal aid to athletes and improved the quality of its services with an updated website, usathlete.org …”

With regard for the U.S. Center for SafeSport, for which the Moran-Blumenthal bill requires a flat annual contribution of $20 million in perpetuity, the USOPC noted that its support for that organization was $4.5 million in 2018, rising to $7.5 million in 2019 and a promised $11.5 million in 2020. As to its performance – it is completely separate from the USOPC – the report stated:

“In 2019, the Center received 2,770 reports, opened 1,151 cases based on exclusive jurisdiction (sexual misconduct), asserted discretionary jurisdiction over 144 allegations of emotional or physical misconduct” (the latter must be turned over to the National Governing Bodies for follow-up).

The centralized SafeSport database of disciplinary actions had 1,218 individuals listed at the end of 2019, of which 235 had been added by the U.S. Center for SafeSport itself.

The USOPC’s education and career programs provided tuition grants of $530,067 to 173 athletes (52 competing Olympians, 72 hopefuls, 49 retired athletes); about 400 athletes received $2.4 million in educational support from donors and USOPC partner DeVry University, and 83 athletes gained job placements through USOPC partners ACE and Adecco Group.

This is a lot of what varying witnesses were looking for in the Congressional testimony. In addition, the USOPC has implemented – and is continuing to increase – scrutiny over the National Governing Bodies with recent by-law and operating rule changes. The program of NGB audits is continuing and the report stressed that 20 audits were completed in 2019 (17 National governing bodies and three Paralympic governing bodies).

It’s worth noting that the USOPC report wasn’t shy and noted the Moran-Blumenthal bill directly:

“This is an important bill aimed at increasing the voice of athletes and strengthening the USOPC’s oversight of the Olympic and Paralympic community in the U.S. While the legislation had yet to officially pass at the close of 2019, we continue to broadly support the bill, which is consistent with many of the reforms our organization had already implemented or began to shape in 2019.”

Now passed by the Senate, a companion bill in the U.S. House was announced, co-sponsored by Susan Brooks (R-Indiana), John Curtis (R-Utah), Diana DeGette (D-Colorado) and Ted Lieu (D-California).

There are significant problems with the bill from the International Olympic Committee’s standpoint, notably the ability of the Congress to – by resolution – dissolve the USOPC Board or dismiss a National Governing Body, but this may yet be worked out in the House version.

But make no mistake, the USOPC has seen the dangers and has done much of what has been requested of it in terms of organizational and structural reform. Whether this satisfies its critics – and/or the Congress – is another matter.

The actual financial report was not that dramatic. As is usual in a non-Olympic year, the USOPC posted a loss in operations; in 2019, this was $38.80 million in revenue of $205.16 million and expenses of $243.95 million. However, thanks to strong investment performance in 2019, the combined assets of the USOPC, U.S. Olympic Endowment and the USOPC Foundation rose to $605.73 million at the end of 2019.

One very positive sign for the future was the increase in public fundraising by the Foundation, which attracted 49,722 contributors, who gave a combined $40.60 million, a new high; the number of individual donors rose by almost 20% from 2018.

The USOPC’s financial strength will help it through the coronavirus pandemic, but if the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo and/or the 2022 Winter Games in Beijing are canceled, the organization could be in trouble, not to mention the already-precarious situation of the National Governing Bodies. A note on the post-2019 issues revealed a possibly important contract issue between the IOC and U.S. broadcaster NBC:

“A Right of Abatement clause was also triggered [by the postponement], whereby after completion of the Games in 2021, NBC and the IOC shall negotiate in good faith an equitable reduction in the applicable Broadcast Rights payments. In addition, the USOPC is negotiating with multiple current sponsors, [U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Properties] and various vendors in Tokyo to accommodate the postponement, and further assessment of near- or long-term impact is ongoing.”

What will actually happen is unknown, by the IOC, by NBC, by the USOPC, its sponsors and the Congress. But this 2019 report shows that the USOPC was listening during the Congressional hearings and has been making progress. But that may still not be enough to avoid being struck by lightning … multiple times.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

MILLER TIME: How Risk Averse Is Tokyo’s Postponement?

(It’s a pleasure to present this guest column by one of the most knowledgeable observers of the Olympic Movement, Britain’s David Miller. For more than 50 years, the former English footballer has covered the Olympic Games and the sports within it, including 15 years as the Chief Sports Correspondent of The Times of London, with stints at the Daily Express and the Daily Telegraph. Author of books on athletics, football and the Olympics, he was Official Historian of the IOC from 1997-2018. His opinions are, of course, his own alone.)

The Olympic Games, postponed and rescheduled for next summer in Tokyo 124 years after de Coubertin’s resurrection, are normally distinguished on two counts: the simultaneous presence of the world’s elite performers from all but a handful of contemporary non-motorised sports, together with representatives of almost every nation great or small in the shared egalitarian ambiance of a communal village (bar a venue-separated minority such as rowing).

A reluctant question-mark hangs over Tokyo’s face saving, financially stretched, commendable wish to rescue humanity’s foremost cultural festival: is this virus-wracked occasion inevitably going to be second rate on many estimates? In performance levels, absent superstars, some absent nations – U.S.? Brazil? Russia (suspended by WADA) – fewer spectators, probably some absent sponsors and… critically absent dollars?

Will Tokyo, perhaps ultimately encouraged by the Olympic ‘owners’, the International Olympic Committee, sooner or later reach a calculation, on both economic and emotional levels, that in the manner of World War cancellations of 1916 and 1940-44, the sensible option is discontinuation of this mammoth operation until, optimistically, Paris ’24?

Seized news-wise at age 13 by stand-in U.S. sprinter Harrison Dillard at London’s make-do austerity Games of 1948 – a sprint outsider whose autograph I gained sixty years later – my life’s pulse has synchronised with the Olympics. I’m the last to wish their cancellation, yet might it not make common sense? Can we not all remember going on a seaside holiday and it rained?

Some will say, “If London’s ‘recovery’ worked in ’48, why not now in Tokyo?” Yet London then was a different scenario. There did not exist, in that era, multiple world championships in many sports establishing a familiar global ranking order: it was the Olympics which provided that, and it had been a whole twelve years earlier at that time. Track legends such as neutral Sweden’s Gunder Hagg were ineligible professionals.

What London ’48 did was to help reunite the post-War free world, along with a small number of new heroes: the phenomenal Czech distance runner Emil Zatopek and Dutch matronly sprinter Fanny Blankers-Koen; teenage American decathlon champion Robert Mathias; rare world champion British cyclist of 1947, Reg Harris, left with silver behind Mario Ghella of Italy; remarkable Hungarian Laszlo Papp’s first of three middleweight boxing crowns; Sweden and Yugoslavia revealing expertise that was to re-shape FIFA’s map.

The supposedly ‘damaged’ Games of Montreal ’76, Moscow ’80 and L.A. ’84, all torn by boycotts, held different perceptions: absentees, whether nations or individuals, were victims of government authority. The concept of loss, of some performance reduction and of blame, was emotionally very different.

What Tokyo ’21 will likely do is remind us what we will NOT have: a Usain Bolt, a Steve Redgrave, maybe no acrobatic Simone Biles; no equivalent of Fiji’s miraculous Sevens rugby squad, probably no poolside Michael Phelps or Katie Ledecky; no phenomenal equivalent to Brazil’s unknown canoe hero Isaquias Queiroz; perhaps no emergent star from a minor nation such as tennis champion Monica Puig for Puerto Rico’s first ever gold medal.

This is the risk: a Games in which an alert television audience, informatively armed with contemporary elite pre-Covid ‘league tables’ in every sport and prompted by commentators, will day-by-day be able to measure sub-standard results.

Yes, there will be some unexpected heroes and heroines – but for what may be for some International Federations, or Japan, and for many competitors – a serious financial loss.

Comments are welcome here and or direct to David Miller here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Allman opens 2020 with American discus record; World A-A champ Chellsie Memmel un-retired at 32; Rodchenkov says doping will never be conquered

The first American women to throw the discus past 70 m: Valarie Allman

(★ Friends: Thank you! Some 50 of you have contributed to our half-yearly server and support costs, and have now covered the current bill!!! Your support means a lot; if you wish to help with future costs, please donate here. Thank you, in advance this time! ★)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Athletics ● Ex-Stanford star Valarie Allman continued her climb from national to world class with an American Record throw of 70.15 m (230-2) on Saturday at the Iron Wood Throws Center Invite in Rathdrum, Idaho.

She wasted no time, powering an enormous throw in her first meet of the season that measured 70.11 m on the laser-measurer. That’s 230-0 and way past the U.S. standard of 69.17 m (226-4) by Gia Lewis-Smallwood in 2014. Once the steel-tape measurement was done, the final mark was confirmed as 70.15 m (230-2).

Allman fouled her next two throws, then reached 65.86 m (216-1) and 66.03 m (216-7) before a final effort of 62.09 m (203-8). A three-time NCAA scorer for Stanford in 2015-16-18, she is now no. 25 all-time an is the 26th thrower to surpass 70 m. It’s worth noting that Allman is only the third 70 m thrower whose lifetime best came in this century: Sandra Perkovic (CRO) did 71.41 m (234-3) in 2017 and Cuba’s Denia Caballero reached 70.65 m (231-9) in 2015.

That wasn’t all for the Iron Wood meet, with Chase Ealey getting the outdoor world lead in the shot at 19.41 m (63-8 1/4) and Kara Winger taking the American lead in the javelin at 64.44 m (211-5). Winger was the busiest person at the meet, also acting as the recorder for the discus and the lead official for the shot put!

In the men’s javelin, Riley Dolezal scored an American-leading 79.39 m (260-5).

There was quite a bit of action elsewhere during what would have been the 2020 Olympic Games if not for the coronavirus pandemic. At the Big Friendly meet in Newberg, Oregon, World 800 m Champion Donavan Brazier ran a world-leading 1:43.84 in what was little more than a time trial, winning by almost six seconds. Britain’s Josh Kerr ran a world-leading 3:34.53 for the 1,500 m. Shannon Rowbury won the women’s 1,500 m in a speedy 4:03.62.

In yet another Bowerman Track Club intrasquad meet in Portland, the women’s foursome of Colleen Quigley, Elise Cranny, Karissa Schweizer and Shelby Houlihan ran a world-record 16:27.02 for the 4 x 1,500 m, shattering Kenya’s 16:33.58 from 2014. With only two teams in the race, it’s not clear if the mark can be ratified, however.

A men’s foursome of Evan Jager, Grant Fisher, Sean McGorty and Lopez Lomong ran an American Record of 14:34.97, the second-fastest ever; this has a better chance of being approved as an American mark by USA Track & Field.

In the fifth American Track League meet in Marietta, Georgia, Katie Nageotte cleared 4.92 m (16-1 3/4) for the world outdoor lead in the women’s vault.

Did he or didn’t he?

A story in the Italian daily La Gazzetto dello Sport reported that reigning Olympic 400 m champ Wayde van Niekerk tested positive for the coronavirus prior to a meet in Trieste (ITA) last Saturday, but this was denied by his agent and by a teammate.

However, none of the South African squad scheduled to run in the meet showed up. Van Niekerk was reported to have taken a second test, which came back negative. Will we see him soon?

The pandemic has been tough on everyone, including World 200 m Champion Noah Lyles. On Sunday, he tweeted:

“Recently I decided to get on antidepressant medication. That was one of the best decisions I have made in a while. Since then I have been able to think with out the dark undertone in mind of nothing matters. Thank you God for mental Health”

He added later:

“I didn’t realize how bad it was till I started taking the medicine”

The response was overwhelmingly positive, with more than 500 retweets, likes and comments.

The campaign to restore Jim Thorpe as the actual winner of the 1912 Olympic pentathlon and decathlon continues, with a petition being circulated on the sidelines of the production of a feature film about Thorpe.

“Bright Path: The Jim Thorpe Story” is being produced by Pictureworks Entertainment. Writer Jeff Benjamin notes that “Native American Kyle Kauwika Harris is one of the writers and Martin Sensmeier will be portraying Jim Thorpe.”

Robert Wheeler, who wrote Jim Thorpe: World’s Greatest Athlete in 1981, is serving as Executive Producer of the film.

Thorpe was heroically portrayed by Burt Lancaster in the 1951 Warner Brothers release, “Jim Thorpe – All-American.” The film was well received, earning $1.55 million in the U.S. alone, and Thorpe had a hand in the scripting of the film, just two years prior to his death in 1953.

Cycling ● After being sidelined since March, the UCI World Tours resumed over the weekend with the Strade Bianche races for both men and women.

Belgium’s Wout van Aert won the men’s 184 km race that started and finished in Siena (ITA) with an extended attack, finishing 30 seconds ahead of Davide Formolo (ITA) and 32 seconds faster than German Maximilian Schachmann.

The women’s Strade Bianche was also a runaway, this time for Dutch star Annemiek van Vleuten, who won by 22 seconds on the 136 km course. Spain’s Mavi Garcia was second and American Leah Thomas was third, 1:53 back of the winner.

The five-stage Tour de Pologne starts on the 5th and the famed Milan-Sanremo is scheduled for this Saturday (8th).

While the World Tour has restarted, the head of the new Cycling Events Task Force issued a report for race directors, calling attention to holding standard-style road races during the pandemic.

Said Task Force chair Steve Brunner, “I don’t see an issue with time trials, and I could even see some sort of mass-start [event], done in small waves of six or fewer. But you don’t want 50 to 100 people riding together for an extended period of time.”

He said that mountain bike races could be held, with staggered starts.

Football ● Further evidence of the implosion of the 2021 world sports schedule came last week as England withdrew from the women’s SheBelieves Cup tournament in the U.S., to be held in the early spring.

“The [Football Association] has taken the decision not to enter next year’s SheBelieves Cup in the USA. England Women have been privileged to play in the tournament since its inception in 2016, challenging some of the best teams in the world. Our withdrawal from the competition in 2021 is based on existing uncertainties around the future trend of the Covid-19 pandemic, together with a detailed review of our technical priorities for England Women.”

The coronavirus has potentially impacted the U.S. Women’s National Team’s upcoming suit vs. the U.S. Soccer Federation in Los Angeles. The remaining issues advanced to trial concern training and game arrangements with the Women’s National Team maintains were discriminatory.

A trial before Judge R. Gary Klausner has been scheduled for 15 September, but a request by the Women’s National Team for a jury trial was made. Klausner told both sides that a jury trial would require postponement to 26 January 2021 due to the difficulty of empaneling a jury during the pandemic.

Klausner said the two sides had to agree to a bench trial by 6 August (Thursday) if they wished to maintain the 15 September date for a bench trial.

Gymnastics ● The 2005 World All-Around Champion, Chellsie Memmel, announced a comeback at age 32 to try to make the U.S. team for the 2020+1 Olympic Games in Tokyo.

She has been posting videos of her in the gym and said in a video made available last Friday that she is looking toward Tokyo.

At her best, Memmel – a mother of two – won six World Championships medals in 2003-05-06, including a gold in the Uneven Bars in 2003 and a silver in 2005.

The U.S. women’s team will be one of the hardest to make in any sport, with superstar Simone Biles a certainty and a host of Worlds medalists – including former World All-Around Champion Morgan Hurd – competing for the remaining spots. There is also te possibility of qualifying for an individual event through the FIG World Cup circuit, but how many of those opportunities will be available before the Tokyo Games in anyone’s guess.

New Zealand became the latest country to voice concerns about the abuse of young gymnasts.

Reacting to reports noting “club and elite gymnasts had complained of being verbally abused, body-shamed or forced to train while injured, with complaints going back to the 1990s,” the country’s sports minister, Grant Robertson, said these were “deeply concerning” revelations and asked anyone who had been abused, or their parents, to come forward with more information.

Other countries including Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Great Britain, Switzerland and the U.S. have all reacted to allegations of abuse and asked for more information.

Swimming ● OK, this is corny and it’s an obvious promotion for her sponsor Chocolate Milk.

But when coaches talk about the perfect stroke, you might think about a video posted on Monday showing distance superstar Katie Ledecky in the pool, using a snorkel and placing a glass of chocolate milk on her head and swims the length of a 50 m pool … with the glass remaining in position.

Has to be a world record for longest swim with a glass of any kind of milk perched on top of your head, right?

Weightlifting ● USA Weightlifting’s August update to its membership reflected the strain of not being in Tokyo for the 2020 Games, but reflected on the progress the organization has made over time.

Chief executive Phil Andrews noted:

“USA Weightlifting in collaboration with the US Olympic & Paralympic Committee, hosted our strategic planning meeting in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Some attended in person, while others attended via videoconference in a somewhat unique hybrid. This time provided us an opportunity to look back over the significant and exciting changes that have been made in USA Weightlifting in the last four years on and off of the field of play including our stipend system moving from $1000 in total athlete stipends in 2010 to just a shade short of $1,000,000 now, the implementation of athlete mental health programs, the almost doubling of the revenue and the significant growth in our sport, as well as of course our sporting achievements.”

He added:

“We’ve also engaged in a significant amount of fundraising activity in the last month, which continues into early August. We are raising money on behalf of our member clubs in partnership with Snap Raise, so far over $32,000 is headed directly to our member clubs and we hope that will grow in the coming week or so left of the campaign. We are also participating in the Giving Games, which is a 24-NGB effort to raise money for each Team USA to help fund next year.”

Andrews acknowledged the financial crunch that the pandemic has caused, but also promised to continue the NGB’s quarterly financial updates “so members can see how we are doing.”

Every NGB should be doing this.

DopingThe Rodchenkov Affair: How I Brought Down Russia’s Secret Doping Program”has been published by Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of the infamous Moscow Laboratory that was at the center of the Russian doping scandal from 2011-15.

The promotion for the book promises a 320-page “breathtakingly candid journey [that] reveals a rigged system of flawed individuals, brazen deceit and impossible moral choices.”

Rodchenkov, now 61, is living in the U.S. in an undisclosed location under government protection. In an interview with The Financial Times last week, he noted:

“‘We reach limits in political corruption, because the groups around Putin are absolutely criminal,’ he says. ‘We have the most huge and worst tradition: not fighting against doping, but promoting doping. We have the best researchers in my laboratory. No other country could even reach halfway what we did. There may be corruption and collusion … but not so widespread.’”

Rodchenkov says that he found Canadian sprinter Ben Johnson doping at the 1986 Goodwill Games in Moscow, but the positive test was covered up … two years in advance of his infamous positive at the Seoul Olympic Games.

He further explained that the Russian doping program for the Sochi Winter Games in 2014 was made possible by the FSB security service, which found a way to tamper with doping specimens provided by Russian athletes … and swap them for clean samples.

Rodchenkov wrote in the introduction:

“You have heard about the fox and the henhouse?
“Well I was the fox, I built the henhouse.
“Then I ate the chickens”

Separated from his wife and family, who remain in Russia, he has a gloomy outlook for the future, saying “Sport won’t be clean. Never.”

At the BuZZer ● Reader and longtime Olympic writer Karen Rosen sent over a strange story about a 1996 Olympic torch that was presented by Formula 1 chair emeritus Bernie Ecclestone to the International Olympic Committee, supposedly the one used by Muhammad Ali to light the cauldron during the 1996 Opening Ceremony.

As it turns out, the torch used by Ali is actually housed at the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Kentucky.

The torch purchased by Ecclestone and donated to the IOC was signed by Ali and was won at an auction last year, but was not used at the Atlanta opening. Still a nice additional piece to the collection at the IOC Museum in Lausanne, especially with Ali’s signature.

LANE ONE: PanAm Sports Rule 50 forum asks “what does the Olympic Games become?” as John Carlos notes he first saw racism in swimming

(★ Friends: Wow! Happy to report 47 donations over the past few weeks toward our half-yearly server and support costs, covering about 97% of the current bill. A little more help? If you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

The seeds of the iconic 1968 medal-stand protest following the men’s 200 m at the Mexico City Olympic Games started in a swimming pool in New York, and there is no clear-cut outcome to the ongoing discussion of whether such protests should be allowed on Tokyo in 2021.

The turbulent discussion over the protest prohibition of the Olympic Charter in Rule 50 has mostly been between athletes, in online meetings thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, or in conference calls or exchanges of messages.

But last Thursday (30th), three important voices came together for the weekly “Athletes Connect” program on the PanAmSports channel, offering impressive insights into the views of athletes in the Americas and the current status of the review of Rule 50. PanAm Sports marketing director Alexandra Orlando (CAN: 10-time Pan Am Games medalist in rhythmic gymnastics) moderated the 66-minute discussion with:

John Carlos (USA), the 200 m bronze medalist in 1968;

Aliann Pompey (GUY: four-time Olympian in Athletics at 400 m), head of the PanAm Sports Athlete Commission, and

Kikkan Randall (USA: 2018 Olympic gold medalist in Cross Country Skiing), member of the International Olympic Committee Athletes’ Commission

The short story is that nothing has been decided yet, but there has been lots of discussion, with more coming. A significant roundtable with 68 athletes from 38 out of the 41 countries in the Pan American region was held on 14 July and Pompey noted there was hardly unanimity:

“What we found from that conversation is that the athlete’s views fell across an entire spectrum of reactions. There were a few who thought the Rule should outright be abolished. Some felt that it should be left as it is, while some felt that there is a need for change. Of those who felt there should be some change, there were those who felt that the Rule was fine, but the way the Rule was interpreted needed to be fixed. And then there were others that felt that the Rule itself was the problem. …

“I think our starting point has to be common ground, right? Now, the guidelines allow for expression of opinion on social media, in interviews and press conferences and team meetings, but the cusp of all this is what happens to the podium. That’s where, I think, the main point of contention becomes. …

“I don’t know if anyone else was as surprised as I was but I thought – and I don’t know why – would be that a lot more people are calling for this Rule to be abolished.

“And that’s not the case. People are asking to be allowed to do certain things that fall within the values of the Olympic Games.”

Randall added what appeared to be a developing consensus about part of the solution going forward:

“I think it was really encouraging to see that the IOC Executive Board really understood the magnitude of this right away and they empowered us – the Athletes’ Commission – to go out and conduct like a true consultation with athletes across the globe to find out, you know, what needs are we not addressing, what are the concerns and how can we all come together creatively to find solutions to empower our athletes to use their amazing platforms as role models, to bring light to the issues that are important, to drive for change and to really support what the Olympics are all about. I mean, that’s excellence, respect and friendships.” (Emphasis added)

and

“So, in really gathering all of these viewpoints and seeing the spectrum, what we’re trying to do is we’re trying to, like, grow the pie a little bit bigger and say, OK, is there a way to still protect celebrating performance on the podium, trying to keep the Olympics a little bit removed from too much politics – coming from all sides – can we find ways to amplify the platform of the athletes, in particular because the podium only allows those athletes who actually make the podium to make a stand and we want to grow it so that all athletes can have that spectrum.” (Emphasis added)

And Randall and Pompey are both well aware of the potential issues in simply allowing anyone to do anything on the victory stand. Randall:

“You could imagine a situation where every athlete that goes on the podium has something to talk about, something to demonstrate for and so then it becomes a duel of who can get the most attention. Then you’re completely not even talking about the athletic achievements of day; you’re having this battle. If it’s not prohibited, then who knows if [protests] would get attention?

“I think, ultimately, what athletes are telling us is, you know, we want to avoid that situation by creating better platforms to talk about this stuff and finding some really creative ways for athletes to come together in unity, in solidarity, to like everybody stand for these really important [issues], for equality and social justice and those kinds of things. I think I have some more productive discussions on those kinds of solutions as opposed to who’s going to the referee on who can do what on the podium.”

Both acknowledge the deep desire of athletes to make a stand for justice, which was illuminated by a rarely-remembered story from Carlos about his earliest Olympic ideas. Growing up in Harlem, he was a good swimmer and had a clear goal in mind:

“For 2 1/2 years, I prepared myself mentally and physically to get ready, because I was going to be the first Black swimmer to represent the United States. And I remember after that two years or 2 1/2 years, my father called me – and you can always look in your mom or dad’s eyes when they have to tell you something that’s going to be so hurting to you, and more hurting to them when they tell you – and he said ‘Johnny, we have to talk.’

“‘What’s up, Daddy?’

“He said, ‘Son, I know you want to go to the Olympics as a swimmer, but you are never going to be able to go in swimming in New York.’ He said, ‘I understand, son, but you’re not going to be able to go.’

“I said to him, ‘Daddy, we can’t afford it? He said, ‘Oh no, I can afford it.’ And I said to him, I said ‘why wouldn’t I be able to go?’

“And he took his arm and he put his arm out like that and he rubbed it on his hand, and when he did it, I thought he was rubbing a bug bite. But he told me, in essence, he said ‘Son, merely because of the color of your skin, you will never be able to fulfill your dream as an Olympic swimmer.’

“And he said to me, he said, ‘Son, when you went up to Highbridge Pool with us’ … and [in] just a matter of seconds, I can close my eyes even to this day and see mothers and fathers call their kids out of the water because the young black kids jumped in the water.

“And that made me realize right then that we had a problem, a very serious problem.”

Carlos never forgot that after switching to track and coming cross-country to run at San Jose State, along with fellow to-be-Olympians Tommie Smith and Lee Evans. Although almost a certain medal winner in 1968, he initially thought he should boycott the Games as a race-relations protest. But then a friend told him:

“‘John, you can go home and stay home. But there is someone who is going to go to the Olympic Games in your place and they are going to go the victory stand in your place. The question is, will they represent you the way you feel you need to be represented?’

“Right then, it was imperative that I got my boots back on and went back out to start to train to make this team. Not to disrupt the Games, not to make society disenchanted with the name Carlos, but just merely to pull the shades up and let them see and let them the pain of individuals that will supersede all medals, all glory of that day, is far more important to me and society at the time than my standing with my hand on my heart and tears in my eyes and make believe, just for that 15 minutes in the sun, that everything was right for everyone. All we wanted was an even playing field.

“Here we are, 53 years later, and we’re still at ground zero.”

Pompey and Randall both noted the difficulty in trying to get thousands of athletes worldwide on the same page in terms of awareness and information, including on the IOC’s dedicated Athlete365 site. But there have been some ideas about solutions:

● Randall: “One of our IOC Athletes’ Commission members, our liaison, said ‘Could we do something together at the Opening Ceremonies? Is it a minute of silence, that everybody stands there together in unity to take a stand together?’ That could be a really powerful statement to the world.

“Is it something we agree upon, something that’s allowed on the uniform to represent the Olympic values? I think there are some really creative ways to do that. How can we use our platform, Athlete365, to share the stories of athletes – I think a lot of people assume because you’re an Olympian or Paralympian, you haven’t faced racism, discrimination, all these things, so kind of sharing the stories of what athletes have faced, but how they have used sport to find common ground, to maybe be a role model, to help address these issues.

“We’re also really talking about how we make this a main priority and use some of the IOC’s resources to really tell these stories.”

● Pompey: “A lot of the responses we’ve gotten has fallen along a spectrum that the Rule is fine, that we address these issues in another forum and leave the Olympics to sports and that’s it. That still, I think, needs further discussion; in talking to these people, it’s not that they don’t believe in social justice or not that they don’t believe that racism doesn’t exist. I think more so their focus is on protecting this idea – this ideal – that everything is perfect on the podium, everything kind of withers away at the Olympics and we’re supposed to share this moment together.

“And for some of the people that are in that experience, the battles that they fought to get there don’t go away and they want to share that moment differently. I think looking at solutions … the idea and the suggestion [is] if there’s a way to collectively with the member nations and the IOC address these issues before they come up, before we get to the podium; at the Opening Ceremonies or maybe making available other venues of the Olympics where that sort of thing is allowed, it protects the podium and it protects the view that everyone is used to seeing from the Olympics.”

Randall noted the next steps: “We’re continuing to collect feedback. We hope to come out with a survey by the end of the summer that’s really going to give some quantitative data on how athletes are feeling and then we hope by the Executive Board meeting in October that we have a proposal put together.”

This is one area where the postponement of the Tokyo 2020 Games – which would be in its second week right now – is actually a positive development for all concerned.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: World Athletics gives Russia until 15 August to pay up; FIFA’s Infantino faces Swiss criminal charges; time for IOC to investigate gymnastics?

(★ Friends: So grateful to have received 44 donations over the past few weeks toward our server and support costs, covering about 92% of the current bill. Almost there, but we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Athletics ● The World Athletics Council offered yet another reprieve to the Russian Athletics Federation, after the Russian Minister of Sport promised that the $6.31 million in fines and costs related to the country’s many doping offenses would be paid by 15 August.

During its prior Council meeting in March, World Athletics imposed a $10 million fine on the Russian Athletics Federation, with $5 million due on 1 July and the remainder suspended. In addition, there was $1.31 million in expenses from the continuing work of the Russia Task Force, for a total due of $6.31 million.

RusAF missed the payment and the Council appeared ready to call for the expulsion of Russia, save for a letter received from Russian Sports Minister Oleg Matytsin, a well-known figure in Olympic circles as the head of the FISU, the federation for university sports competitions.

From the Task Force report:

“This morning [30 July] a letter was received from the Russian Minister of Sport, Mr Oleg Matytsin, stating that the two outstanding RusAF invoices (in the amount of $5 million, for the fine instalment; and in the amount of $1.31 million, for the costs) will be paid before 15 August 2020.

“If payment is indeed received in full by that date, the Taskforce would be ready, if Council so wishes, to re-engage with the reinstatement process on the basis specified by Council in March 2020. If the promised payment is not received by that deadline, however, or if the promised plan is not provided and implemented properly thereafter, in the view of the Taskforce it will be time to expel RusAF from membership of World Athletics.”

The report further recommended not only to expel the Russian federation if the fines and costs are not paid by 15 August, but to call a special Congress “as soon as possible” to vote on this question, and that no Russian athletes be allowed to compete internationally.

Even if the fine and costs are paid, the expulsion can go forward if the “RusAF Reinstatement Commission” – an all-Russian body tasked by World Athletics to design and implement a plan to install a doping-free environment into the sport in Russia does not file a detailed plan by 30 August and begin implementation by 30 September 2020 after review by the Russia Task Force.

If this program is implemented, then no more than 10 Russian athletes will be allowed to compete as neutrals in World Athletics Series events if approved by the World Athletics Doping Review Board. The ability of neutrals to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games will be reviewed in December; this may be moot if the Russian appeal of World Anti-Doping Agency sanctions fails at the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

The Council could also require the Russians to pay the remaining $5 million of the fine at a future date, but for now, the next steps are up to the Russian Sports Ministry and the Russian federation. Wrote Task Force chair Rune Andersen (NOR):

“Over the last five years, the Taskforce has spent an enormous amount of time and effort trying to help RusAF reform itself and Russian athletics, for the benefit of all clean Russian athletes. The Taskforce has made itself available at all times to RusAF, and has responded expediently to all requests for help, but ultimately has seen RusAF achieve very little in terms of changing the culture of Russian athletics.”

In the meantime, the hoped-for Wanda Diamond League season is rapidly disintegrating, with cancellations of the two meets in China and the meet in Gateshead (GBR). What’s left, at this point:

(1) 14 August: Monaco (MON)
(2) 23 August: Stockholm (SWE)
(3) 02 September: Lausanne (SUI)
(4) 04 September: Brussels (BEL)
(5) 17 September: Rome (ITA)
(6) 09 October: Doha (QAT)

World Athletics also set up specific date windows for national championships from 2021-24; these are not mandatory on national federations, but will be clear of other major events so that star athletes do not have to choose between selection meetings and paydays.

The organizers of the 2021 World Cross Country Championships in Bathurst (AUS) have asked for a delay from the current 20 March 2021 date, owing to the possible travel-ban situation from the coronavirus pandemic.

Cycling ● One of the saddest reports of the week came from Austria, where three-time Austrian Olympic cyclist Johann “Hans” Lienhart received a 10-year ban from the Austrian Anti-Doping Legal Committee for providing prohibited substances to his son.

The 60-year-old Lienhart, who competed in the Olympic road race and/or Team Time Trial in 1980-84-88, from provided Fabian Lienhart with EPO, testosterone and other drugs from at least December 2018 to February of 2019. Fabian, a two-time national champion in triathlon, was caught for doping and was banned for four years in February 2020.

Football ● Swiss special prosecutor Stefan Keller has begun criminal proceedings against FIFA President Gianni Infantino concerning meetings held in 2017 regarding ongoing corruption inquiries that date back to when Infantino was the Secretary General of UEFA, the governing body for European football.

According to a statement from the Swiss Federal Council on Thursday, Keller “reached the conclusion that, in connection with the meetings between Attorney General Michael Lauber and the Fifa president Gianni Infantino and the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Upper Valais, there are indications of criminal conduct” and that there are “concerns [of] abuse of public office, breach of official secrecy, assisting offenders and incitement to these acts.”

Keller also asked to be able to file charges against Lauber; a Swiss court determined that he had covered up the meetings and lied to his superiors, while the Attorney General’s office was investigating corruption allegations in football.

A FIFA statement noted:

“FIFA, including the FIFA President, remains at the disposal of the Swiss authorities and will, as we have always done, cooperate fully with this investigation.

“‘People remember well where FIFA was as an institution back in 2015, and how substantial judicial intervention was actually required to help restore the credibility of the organisation,’ said the FIFA President earlier today. ‘As President of FIFA, it has been my aim from day one, and it remains my aim, to assist the authorities with investigating past wrongdoings at FIFA. FIFA officials have met with prosecutors in other jurisdictions across the world for exactly these purposes. People have been convicted and sentenced, thanks to FIFA’s cooperation, and especially in the United States of America, where our cooperation has resulted in over 40 criminal convictions. Therefore, I remain fully supportive of the judicial process, and FIFA remains willing to fully cooperate with the Swiss authorities for these purposes.’”

The Bureau of the FIFA Council made good on Infantino’s promises from June to distribute up to $1.5 billion in coronavirus relief to its 211 national federations. This is the third phase of FIFA’s relief project and the one with the most direct impact:

Grants: a universal solidarity grant of USD 1 million is being made available to all FIFA member associations, and an additional grant of USD 500,000 is being allocated specifically to women’s football. In addition, a grant of USD 2 million is being made available to each confederation. The full amount will be made available by January 2021.

Loans: all FIFA member associations will be able to apply for interest-free loans amounting to up to 35 per cent of their audited annual revenues. In the interest of solidarity, a minimum loan entitlement of USD 500,000 and a maximum loan entitlement of USD 5 million will be available. In addition, each confederation will have access to a loan of up to USD 4 million.”

This is, of course, by far the largest distribution of funds to national federations by any of the International Federations.

Gymnastics ● A steady stream of abuse allegations against young gymnasts has been surfacing, now in multiple countries on multiple continents. Beyond the well-known expose of the Larry Nassar crimes as a USA Gymnastics team physician, inquiries are now underway in:

● Australia
● Belgium
● Great Britain
● The Netherlands
● Switzerland

And the issue has been reviewed in Canada as well. Japan’s Morinari Watanabe, President of the Federation Internationale de Gymnastique, issued a lengthy statement on Tuesday which included:

“I want to tell the gymnasts who have the courage to speak out that their voices matter.

“I want to tell them that it is never too late to get involved and to push for reform, at any level.

“When I became President of the FIG in 2017, just months after the Larry Nassar scandal came to light in the United States, I promised to undertake whatever was needed to avoid that such cases of massive sexual abuse could happen again in our sport. …

“In the wake of this affair, the FIG has established the Gymnastics Ethics Foundation to encourage anyone to report any form of rules violation, abuse and harassment, and to provide a safe, confidential mechanism to do so.

“The task was not easy, but today the Foundation is fully operational and is investigating several cases.

“As well as any form of physical violence clearly being intolerable, insults and threats have no place in any training hall. Whatever is at stake, Gymnastics must remain, above all, a fun sport to practice.

“More can be done to draw a clear separation between what is acceptable and what is not. The FIG is working on initiatives to that end. We all know plenty of positive tales in the sport. Those are the ones that need to be shared and replicated.”

The countries where abuse has been reported are all democracies with considerable freedom-of-expression safeguards. What about abuse in other countries? Does the IOC have to put more pressure on the FIG to institute a change in culture?

Games of the XXXV Olympiad: 2032 Sydney Morning Herald sports columnist Phil Lutton essentially lost his mind when Qatar sent a letter to the International Olympic Committee, asking for discussions about hosting the 2032 Olympic Games.

Qatar bid should put Queensland’s 2032 Olympic hopes on red alert” read the headline, followed by:

“The Queensland bid, which has been put on hold amid the COVID-19 crisis, was considered a clear front runner against possible bids from Indonesia, Spain, India and Germany, among others, before the Qatar Olympic Committee decided to add its name to the process.

“It could bring back nightmares for Australia when it comes to bidding for major global events. Qatar will host the FIFA World Cup in 2022 after winning a controversial ballot amid allegations of bribery and corruption. Australia also bid for the event and polled just one vote.”

It’s hard to see how Qatar can be a serious player since the Olympic Games need to happen in the Northern Hemisphere summer – July and August – to achieve maximum worldwide exposure on television, especially in the Americas and Europe. But the story did have some interesting comments about the importance of the Games from the omnipresent John Coates, the important IOC member in Australia and a confidant of IOC chief Thomas Bach (GER).:

“It provides tremendous stimulus, not just to high-performance sport. What an Olympic Games does is bring sport into the community and society again, and encourage people to practice at any level.

“At the AOC, we love it when our athletes win medals at the Olympic Games. But the target for us is to provide an opportunity for all of our sports to participate in the Olympics, particularly the smaller sports in this country.

“By hosting a Games here, you do stimulate the numbers of grassroots participation and that’s very, very important.”

More important than worrying about Qatar, certainly.

The Last Word ● The worldwide sports schedule is now being impacted into 2022. In the last few days, Panama City (PAN) renounced its hosting of the 2022 Central American and Caribbean Games and Liverpool (GBR) said it could not host the Special Olympics National Summer Games in Great Britain in 2022.

The driver, once again, is the coronavirus pandemic, which is now not only a medical issue, but also stopping all marketing, sponsorship and ticket sales efforts. Expect more of these announcements as the months drag on before a vaccine is found and distributed.

LANE ONE: Remembering 10 people and things you didn’t know (or remember) about the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles

The magnificently-decorated peristyle end of the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum for the Opening Ceremonies of the 1984 Olympic Games (Photo: Wikipedia)

(★ Friends: So grateful to have received 43 donations over the past few weeks toward our server and support costs, covering about 89% of the current bill. Almost there, but we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

For many of us who worked on the Games of the XXIIIrd Olympiad in Los Angeles, 28 July is a special day on the calendar, a day which many critics said would never come: the Opening Ceremony in the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.

It launched a revolutionary Games, one which changed the course of the Olympic Movement and was a defining experience for those of us involved in the planning and staging of the Games.

Much has been written about the 1984 Games, including my own work as the Editor-in-Chief of the Official Report of the Games (volume 1 available here and volume 2 here) and the summary work of facts and figures, called Olympic Retrospective: The Games of the Los Angeles (available here). But there are many more people and memories which did not make big headlines, but deserve to be remembered:

● The Los Angeles effort was initially nicknamed the “Spartan Games.” This was not an advertising agency-inspired branding campaign, but in the aftermath of the billion-dollar deficit run up by the Montreal organizers for 1976, the introduction to the thick bid document responding to the questionnaires from the International Olympic Committee and the International Federations began with:

“Arrangements are to be spartan.”

The author was John Argue, the head of the Southern California Committee for the Olympic Games, who had also led the L.A. campaign for the 1980 Games. Argue, the individual most responsible for bringing the Games to Los Angeles, passed up the chance to head the organizing committee, feeling a businessman would be a better fit than a lawyer. He was right.

Peter Ueberroth was selected as to head the organizing committee on 26 March 1979 and, already a millionaire from his First Travel company – which included the popular Ask Mr. Foster agency – put down a deposit on office space in a Century City office building. When he went to open the door on the first day of occupancy, the key wouldn’t work. The leasing agent couldn’t find any credit information on a “Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee” and assumed the company was a fraud.

Needless to say, Ueberroth eventually got the office going. Starting with a shoebox of bills of about $300,000, and with some brilliant guidance from LAOOC Board member David Wolper, the organizing committee had in excess of $2 million in the bank by the 14th of April (how is another story).

● After receiving and dismissing several concepts for the Opening and Closing Ceremonies, Ueberroth turned to Wolper to run the project in 1983. One of the memorable elements of the 1980 Moscow opening was the fabulous card-stunt section that featured the mascot Misha and messages of welcome.

But that was memorably topped during the 1984 Opening by a stupendous stunt that converted the entire Coliseum (sans the press section, of course) into a continuous card section, showing the flags of the nations attending the Games. The credit goes to Mark Flaisher, who had plenty of prior experience as the card-stunt coordinator for the UCLA Rally Committee, which staged many memorable student-section card shows during football games, including night games using flashlights! He’s still at it today, and produced the on-stage show for the 25th anniversary gala held on the Coliseum floor in 2009.

● The organizing committee was guided by a folk-rock group – as we liked to call it – of “Peter, Paul and Harry.” That was Ueberroth, of course; Paul Ziffren, who succeeded Argue was the chair of the Board of Directors and had a major, behind-the-scenes impact on making the Games work within the L.A. political environment, and Harry L. Usher, a well-known entertainment attorney who became the Executive Vice President/General Manager in 1980. Both Ziffren and Usher have passed away, but both contributed mightily to the Games success, and for the staff, Usher’s impact on making the Games work was incalculable (and he was a fun guy … most of the time).

● Because of the financial pressure of having to put on the Games without government guarantees, every department and every requirement was scrutinized thoroughly. The results often changed the way the Games were implemented.

The normal “youth” activity for the organizing committee had been an “International Youth Camp,” with about 1,500 youngsters from around the world coming for the Games period to experience the Olympic spirit and their own mini-village. This offered no benefits for a metropolitan region like Los Angeles and despite IOC objections, the idea was trashed in favor of a four-year program of sports, education and cultural activities.

Some 23 different programs were created under the direction of long-time educator Dan Cruz and paired sports and sponsors for multi-year programs in archery, athletics, basketball, football, handball, judo, sailing, swimming, synchronized swimming, tennis, volleyball, band and drill team and art projects. Combined with a curriculum study for ages 12-17, the program reached 1.25 million participants over four years and was the direct lead-in to the post-Games LA84 Foundation programs that continue to this day.

Same for the cultural program. Often a series of exhibitions and performances during the Games featuring only artists from the host country, the concept was exploded to cover 10 weeks, with most of the action taking place in the eight weeks prior to the Games period.

The “Olympic Arts Festival” was developed by CalArts President Robert Fitzpatrick and staff director Hope Tschopik and was a stunning success all across Los Angeles, thanks to its inclusionary vision and high-profile participants such as the Pina Bausch Wuppertaler Tanztheater from West Germany, Britain’s Royal Opera of Covent Garden and many, many more. Total attendance was in excess of 1.26 million.

● Two not-widely-known but critical senior staff members were Joel Rubenstein and Dick Sargent, both of whom were among the earliest people hired.

Rubenstein and Ueberroth were the early drivers of the LAOOC’s sponsorship sales program that redefined sports marketing worldwide. During Rubenstein’s interview, an impressed Ueberroth asked “how long can you do without being paid?” Joel didn’t have to wait that long for his first check, and after two years in the marketing area, he was asked to lead the thankless Olympic Family Services group, dealing with the IOC and the National Olympic Committees. Rubenstein was nicknamed “Mr. No” for refusing almost any request which might cost more than a nickel, but was lauded during the Games when those things which were promised were actually delivered … and much more. He also was first in line at every hot restaurant in L.A. when entertaining Olympic guests, including the impossible-to-get-into Ma Maison.

Sargent, a friend of Ueberroth since college days at San Jose State, took on the impossible tasks, starting with negotiating the venue leases. His first major deal was with Dr. Jerry Buss, then the owner of the NBA Lakers, NHL Kings and The Forum. Considered the sharpest operator in sports at the time, Buss agreed to very fair terms with the LAOOC for use of The Forum after Sargent proposed to place boxing there – The Forum had an active boxing program – instead of basketball. But Buss wanted basketball and so the deal got done on reasonable terms. That made the rest of the agreements easier.

Among his other tasks? Arranging for the first-ever cross-country Torch Relay, on a scale never before attempted and which raised $10.31 million for charity (about $25.58 million today). And a lot of other, smaller projects that Dick still won’t reveal to this day.

● The worst venue owner to deal with was the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission. Trying to get an agreement for the Coliseum and the since-demolished Memorial Sports Arena was maddening, so much so that Usher asked me – given my long background in track & field – if the sport could be held in the Rose Bowl!

(There actually had been meets there in June of 1966 and 1967, but on a weird, 385-yard rubberized track. Today, new construction technologies would actually allow Olympic track & field to be held there!)

A deal was finally completed in 1983 and as the construction effort inside the Coliseum was underway in spring 1984, the LAOOC’s brilliant head of architecture & construction, the 6-foot-8 Ed Keen, said the decor could be installed as a semi-permanent feature in the stadium. Nope; the Commission insisted it all had to come down immediately after the Games.

But it was so spectacular (see above) that the Commission asked Keen to leave it up. Of course, since it was not weather-proofed, it decayed rapidly and finally fell apart and was removed in December 1984. Keen is still shaking his head about that one.

● One of the surprises of the Games was the tremendous popularity of soccer (men only), which had the highest total attendance of all sports at 1.42 million (next was track & field at 1.13 million).

There is a direct line between that success and the first FIFA World Cup to be hosted in the U.S. in 1994 and the launch of Major League Soccer in 1996. A key figure in all three was Los Angeles attorney Alan Rothenberg, who served as the LAOOC’s Commission for soccer and went on to head the World Cup ‘94 organizing committee, with another LAOOC alumnus, Scott LeTellier as President.

● If you believed the reporting about the LAOOC in the Los Angeles Times, we were resolutely incensed by criticism of any kind. But that was hardly true, as illustrated by a lengthy, negative critique of the committee’s design program in the January/February 1984 issue of the influential Communication Arts magazine. The author, Larry Klein, impressed Usher so much during the interviews for the story that Klein was himself hired as Director of Design and did a brilliant job integrating the imaginative Festive Federalism concept into every corner of the 1984 Games.

● Even after the Games were over, the LAOOC was being ripped – after announcing an initial surplus estimate of $150 million – for not refunding the Village costs of about $7 million to the National Olympic Committees. Truth be told, the LAOOC was willing to do so, happily, but the United States Olympic Committee – which was to receive 40% of any surplus with another 20% going to the National Governing Bodies – said no.

The 1984 Games was a remarkable success and began a new era of prosperity for the Olympic Movement, which it continues to enjoy today. But it was the people within the LAOOC, from many countries and with many different interests and talents, which made the Games work so well.

We have lost many of our friends, but there are still many left who continue to mark 28 July as a special day. Me too, always.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Comebacking Bromell steams to 9.90 win in Florida; honors for Jim Ryun; will Simone Biles compete in 2024?

Back to the top: former Baylor star Trayvon Bromell!

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport (updated):

Athletics ● The comeback story of 2020 is 2016 Olympic sprinter Trayvon Bromell, who finished eighth in Rio and ran 9.84 in 2015 and 2016, then was felled by injuries.

Could he come back? Would he come back? Yes to both.

He impressed with a 10.04 clocking on 4 July in Monteverde, Florida, then stormed to a 9.90 win (wind: +1.4 m/s) in Clermont, Florida on Friday, besting Noah Lyles (10.04) in heat three.

Lyles went on to win in the final in 9.93w (+2.3), then took the 200 m final in a speedy 19.94, the world leader for 2020. Steven Gardiner (BAH) showed he’s in good form with a win in the second section of the 200 m, winning in 19.96, ahead of Lyles’ brother Josephus, who ran a lifetime best of 20.24.

With Bromell’s return from injury, the U.S. sprint corps is as solid as ever; using combined 2019 and 2020 times, the top Americans:

9.76 Christian Coleman ‘19 (provisional suspension as of 14 May)
9.86 Noah Lyles ‘19
9.86 Michael Norman ‘20
9.87 Justin Gatlin ‘19
9.90 Trayvon Bromell ‘20
9.93 Cravon Gillespie ‘19

Adding in 2018, Ronnie Baker ran 9.87 before his own injury issues, veteran Mike Rodgers was at 9.89, Isiah Young ran 9.92 and Cameron Burrell timed 9.93. Wow!

Other marks of note last week:

Men’s 110 m Hurdles: 13.35 for world champ Grant Holloway (USA) in Clermont;

Men’s Shot Put: Another contender to watch, as Nick Ponzio reached 21.72 m (71-3 1/40 for a lifetime best in a small meet in Kutztown, Pennsylvania last Friday.

Men’s Discus: Colombia’s Mauricio Ortega got a national record and a world leader at 70.29 m (230-7) in a meet in Portugal on 22 July.

Men’s Hammer: Impressive 80.70 m (264-9) for American Rudy Winkler, the world leader and making him the no. 3 American of all time. He had the series of his life, reaching lifetime bests of 77.97 m (255-9) on his first throw and 79.45 m (260-8) on his second try before his explosion in round five.

Women’s 100 m: 10.98 world-leader for Shaunae Miller-UIbo (BAH) in Clermont; also a windy 10.79 for Sha’Carri Richardson at the AP Ranch High Performance II meet in Ft. Worth and a windy 10.73 from Jamaica’s reigning Olympic 100 m champ Elaine Thompson-Helah in Kingston, Jamaica.

Women’s 200 m: 21.98 for Miller-Uibo, another world leader, at Clermont.

Women’s 1,500 m: Ex-Missouri star Karissa Schweizer continued her rampage, running a lifetime best and world-leading 4:00.02 to win the third Portland Intrasquad meet on 21 July, shattering her prior best from 30 June of 4:02.81. Before the season started, her best was 4:06.77!

On Friday (24th), legendary American distance runner Jim Ryun, now 73, was presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

One of the sport’s all-time distance icons, Ryun came to prominence at Wichita East High School, becoming the first prep to run the mile under four minutes and then went on to amazing success at Kansas.

He set four world records in his career, including 1:44.9 for 880 yards in 1966 (also equaling the 800 m record of 1:443.3), 3:33.1 for 1,500 m (1967) and 3:51.3 (1966) and 3:51.1 (1967) for the mile. He was an Olympian in 1964, 1968 and 1972. Favored to win the 1,500 m in Mexico City in 1968, he finished second to Kip Keino (KEN) and then fell in his heat of the 1,500 m in Munich in 1972.

He ran in the International Track Association for a couple of seasons, but finished racing in 1974. He then ran a series of popular sports camps and was a motivational speaker for more than 20 years.

Ryun later become the U.S. Representative for the 2nd District of Kansas as a Republican, serving from 1996-2007.

On the same day that Ryun was honored, Kenyan great Ben Jipcho died in Eldoret, at age 77.

One of the world’s great distance runners of the late 1960s and early 1970s, Jipcho paced eventual gold medalist Keino in the final of the 1968 Olympic 1,500 m in a tag-team effort that was successful in defeating Ryun, who won silver.

Jipcho won a silver medal himself at the 1972 Munich Games behind Keino in the 3,000 m Steeplechase and then went on to set two world records in the race in 1973, at 8:19.8 (hand) and 8:13.91.

He finished with sensational lifetime bests of 3:33.16 at 1,500 m and 13:14.30 for 5,000 m, both in 1974 at the British Commonwealth Games, where he won the 5,000 m and finished third in the 1,500. He joined the short-lived International Track Association for a few meets in 1974 and 1975, but retired during the 1975 season.

The Los Angeles Marathon announced that its “Stadium to the Sea” race course has been revised, beginning with the 2021 race, to finish in Century City, on Avenue of the Stars.

The race had finished on Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica from 2011-19, but the race was canceled for 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic. The reason given for the finish line move concerned more space in the finish area, but the driver was the enormous costs for holding the final four miles of the race in Santa Monica at an annual cost to the race of about $400,000, or as one observer put it, “$100,000 a mile.” Future costs will be considerably less, with the race still taking place in Los Angeles, West Hollywood and Beverly Hills.

The new course will be nicknamed “Stadium to the Stars,” which makes good sense since Century City itself was built on the old 20th Century-Fox Studios backlot, sold for development in 1961 as the cost for the epic “Cleopatra” soared out of control.

Gymnastics ● Superstar Simone Biles participated in an Instagram chat, which included:

“[T]he four-time artistic gymnastics Olympic champion did not explicitly rule out competing at Paris 2024, where she would be 27 years old. Her coaches, Laurent and Cecile Landi, are both from France, and Biles said they often mention it during practice sessions.

“‘You know, Cecile and Laurent joke about that a lot. It’d be really crazy because I don’t get any younger as time goes on,’ Biles noted. ‘I try to pass it on to the younger girls, telling them ‘I’ll probably be there to watch you. But I’ll be there, one way or another. Probably in the stands.’”

Of dealing with the one-year delay of the 2020 Games:

“Obviously there were times where I was like, I don’t know if I can do this. It’s a major setback for everybody, it’s not just me, so that’s what kept my spirits and hopes up. That made it easier. I know I have a great team surrounding me so with all of that I know we’ll be solid. Don’t give up, we’re all in this together, literally the entire world is in this together so you’re not alone.”

International Olympic Committee ● The IOC announced the passing of Flor Isava Fonseca, its first-ever female member, last Saturday (25th) at age 99.

A Venezuelan Olympian in equestrian in the 1956 competition held in Stockholm (SWE), she was elected in 1981 and with Finland’s Pirjo Haggman, were the first women members of the IOC. Fonseca was the first to take the oath as a member of the IOC.

Fonseca became the first female member of the IOC Executive Board, in 1990 and served into 2002 and then became an honorary member. She will forever be remembered as a barrier breaker in the Olympic Movement.

The IOC was slammed for tweeting a video of the 1936 Berlin Games last Thursday (23rd) as part of a series to highlight the history of the torch relay, which was first held as a part of that Games.

Response to the video was quick, and the IOC deleted the tweet. The Associated Press reported an IOC statement on Friday that included “We apologize to those who feel offended by the film of the Olympic Games Berlin 1936.

“We have deleted this film, which was part of the series of films featuring the message of unity and solidarity, from the @Olympics Twitter account.”

Among those condemning the video was the museum at the site of the infamous Auschwitz-Birkenau death camps: “For 2 weeks the Nazi dictatorship camouflaged its racist, militaristic character. It exploited the Games to impress foreign spectators with an image of a peaceful, tolerant Germany. Later, Germany’s expansionism, the persecution of Jews & other ‘enemies of the state’ accelerated.”

U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee ● A new fund-raising program has been started by the USOPC in conjunction with its Athletes Advisory Council and the U.S. National Governing Bodies.

The COVID Athlete Assistance Fund was announced on the year-to-go date of 23 July, using the U.s. Olympic & Paralympic Foundation “to work with its network of donors to raise funds, 100% of which will go directly to eligible athletes who are currently training and in contention to represent the U.S. at the Tokyo 2020 and Beijing 2022 Games.”

The fund-raising effort is slated to run through the end of September and has already had success:

“An anonymous long-time USOPF supporter has made an initial contribution of $500,000 to help launch the fund, and Ralph Lauren, an official Team USA Outfitter since 2008, is committing 25% of the purchase price from each unit from its Team USA One-Year-Out Collection to this effort.”

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020 ● Although the Tokyo Games have been put off for a year, two of the venues already built are opening for athlete training.

The Tokyo Tatsumi International Swimming Center, which will host water polo, will open on 21 August 2020 for elite-athlete use only, and the Canoe Slalom Centre will be available for training usage starting today (27th July).

Games of the XXXV Olympiad: 2032 ● Now Qatar has sent a letter to the International Olympic Committee, “explore our interest further and identify how the Olympic Games can support Qatar’s long-term development goals.”

It’s the latest move in an aggressive period for Qatar, which hosted a poorly-attended version of the IAAF World Championships last year in Doha and which will play host to the 2022 FIFA World Cup.

The obvious problem for Qatar is its summer heat, which forced the IAAF Worlds into the fall and has the FIFA World Cup in November and December. The IOC wants the Olympic Games to be held in July and August, the most convenient slot for its American and European broadcasters.

At the BuZZer ● The sixth “Sporlympic” auction of Olympic memorabilia was held on Saturday by Vermot & Associes of Paris (FRA), including multiple Olympic torches. Highlights:

Lot 106: 1936 torch (Berlin), sold for € 2,100 (~$ 2,468)
Lot 107: 1992 torch (Barcelona), sold for € 1,500 (~$ 1,763)
Lot 108: 1996 torch (Atlanta), sold for € 2,300 (~$ 2,703)
Lot 110: 2000 torch (Sydney), sold for € 5,000 (~$ 5,876)
Lot 112: 2012 torch (London), sold for € 3,000 (~$ 3,526)

Torches from Moscow 1980, Nagano 1998 and Rio 2016 did not sell. A set of seven of the official posters from Moscow 1980 did sell, for € 150 (~$177).

The Associated Press reported that an original drawing of the Olympic rings by Pierre de Coubertin from 1913 was sold an auction in Cannes (FRA):

“‘The drawing was sold to a Brazilian collector for a price of €185,000 plus 27% costs, or €234,950,’ [$276,055] associate director of Cannes Encheres Alexandre Debussy told French media.”

The rings symbol debuted at the 1920 Olympic Games in Antwerp (BEL), the first Games held after the conclusion of World War I.

(Thanks to readers Jim Bendat for correcting Ryun’s 3:51.3 mile world record to 1966, not 1965 as originally shown, and Brian Springer for a grammatical error.)

LANE ONE: LA 2028 might be the quietest organizing committee in history, but things are happening

(★ Friends: Very grateful to have received 40 donations over the past month toward our server and support costs, covering about 81% of our current bill. But we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

If you can’t remember hearing much about the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles – even if you live in Los Angeles – you’re not alone.

The International Olympic Committee’s 17 July Session-by-teleconference offered a rare opportunity to see a report by the LA 2028 folks and some commentary by the IOC’s Coordination Commission.

The LA28 report was short: a six-slide presentation that underlined that while its public profile is almost non-existent, it is continuing to work on its plans for the Games.

Beyond the technical planning, the current efforts are focused on sponsorship sales, creation of a solid “brand” identity and continuing support for the youth programs promised at the time of its selection:

● Hiring continues as a modest pace; the presentation noted there are 65 staff across three offices – to support the sales effort in conjunction with the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee in Colorado Springs and NBC television in the New York area – with almost everyone working from home at present.

● The first sponsorship agreement was announced with Delta Airlines on 2 March. The “ticketing and hospitality business model” is being determined in coordination with the IOC’s Hospitality Working Group.

Although only the Delta agreement has been announced, the first page of the presentation focuses on what appears to be an image of Olympic superstar Allyson Felix in the starting blocks, prominently clad in Nike shoes (a brand she is not presently associated with). A portent of the next deal to be revealed?

● The “LA28″ brand is set to be launched soon, although the timing is being impacted by the coronavirus pandemic and the postponement of the 2020 Games by a year. The slide notes: “LA28 views the brand launch as a shift from a low-profile and local approach to the start of a more active engagement strategy.”

● The youth program has begun with pilot programs with the Swim L.A. project in 2018 and 2019, and an agreement with the City of Los Angeles for funding through 2028 was concluded in March 2020 (more on this below). All of the programming is, of course, on hold for now due to the pandemic.

The IOC Coordination Commission report was also short, at four pages. Its key takeaway was:

“In order to achieve the financial target announced during the candidature phase (balanced budget of USD 6.9 billion), a significant portion of the OCOG staff is working in this specific area.”

More sponsorship announcements are expected by the end of the year and sponsor promotion of the Los Angeles Games can begin in 2021.

Other documentation has also become available from the LA28 organizers, notably its 18 March 2020 agreement with the City of Los Angeles concerning youth programs. The agreement states that:

● LA28 will contribute all $160 million of the promised donation to youth sports programs of the City’s Department of Recreation and Parks.

● Payments of $4.8 million will be made quarterly, beginning 1 July 2020, through 31 August 2028. That’s $19.2 million per year for nine years, plus an earlier payment of $6.4 million due by the end of June 2020.

● The agreement notes that the City Parks & Recreation requested $1.31 million from LA28 in 2018 for the Swim L.A. program, with registration expanding from 18,193 to 36,073, and an additional $1.46 million for 2019, with registration again rising to 40,000. Those early payments of $2.77 million were credited against the first payment of $6.4 million.

● The concept of the project is simply stated thus: “The Parties acknowledge and agree that the majority of any year’s Grant Funds shall be reserved for use by [Parks & Recreation] to offset Direct Costs of participation in Quality Youth Sport Leagues and Classes.”

Combined with the LA84 Foundation’s Play Equity Fund and the new “A11iance” of the 11 Los Angeles-area professional sports teams, this could be a powerful start to providing significantly-increased access to sports and facilities for all Los Angeles-area youth.

● There are, as would be expected for a government program, a slew of plans and reports required, and the agreement notes that “the City may use up to 4% of total Grant Funds, six million four hundred thousand dollars ($6,400,000) to recoup or otherwise cover expenses that are consistent with the Parties’ shared goal to increase the number of City youth participating in sport and fitness programs but do not quality as Direct Costs, including but not limited to community engagement and outreach, program Start-Up costs, Safe Sport, marketing, program branding, and reporting requirements.”

The success of the program will be judged against the baseline total of engagement in both classes and sports leagues in the City’s 123 parks and recreation centers, which had 103,948 total participants in fiscal 2018/19. Remember those numbers.

Important, too, is that the City’s Recreation and Parks division is operating this program, not LA28. The latter is just supplying money.

LA28 also filed its Form 990 tax return with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the year 2018 in November of 2019. This was the first return for LA28 as an organizing committee rather than a bid committee. Highlights:

● As expected, there wasn’t much revenue: $566,535, mostly reimbursements and some investment income. Costs were $16.65 million, consisting of salaries, an office lease and build-out, a $1.15 million donation to the City of Los Angeles for youth programs and other items.

AECOM Technical Services was paid $1.3 million for continued development of the Games master plan and The Boston Consulting Group was paid $938,500 for work on the Games budget plan.

● As of 31 December 2018, the organization had a negative net worth of $18.53 million, but $26.61 million in assets thanks to the IOC’s advance payments that will total $180 million through the end of 2022 (shown as “deferred revenue”).

● The staff count through the end of 2018 was low at 28 (now 65 in the middle of 2020). Including the two senior members of the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Properties group – the folks doing the sponsorship sales – there were 12 staff members earning $171,726 or more.

This is an interesting time for LA28 thanks to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic. What might have seemed like a firm plan for the Games last year could be trimmed considerably in the future as Tokyo “simplifies” its Games and the Paris 2024 report insists that use of existing, qualified operators can reduce the staff head count and save money vs. hiring organizing committee employees.

Those are good opportunities for the Los Angeles organizers, for whom less requirements opens new possibilities of how to refresh the event, make it more impactful both locally and worldwide and spend less on items which quite recently were requirements, but may now just be options.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here

THE TICKER: Tokyo 2020+1 marks year-to-go; FINA relief project up to $6.46 million; Michael Norman now a triple threat for Tokyo?

The Olympic Flame inside the new Olympic Stadium in Tokyo (Photo: Tokyo 2020)

(★ Friends: Very grateful to have received 37 donations over the past month toward our server and support costs, covering about 79% of our current bill. But we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020 ● The Tokyo Games were slated to open on Friday, 24 July 2020, but instead a short program was held inside the new Olympic Stadium to mark one year to go to the postponed Games, now expected to begin on 23 July 2021.

Star swimmer Rikako Ikee (JPN), who has returned to training after taking 10 months off to receive treatment for leukemia, participated as part of a three-minute video (available here).

Said organizing committee President Yoshiro Mori:

“I cannot imagine how athletes set to take centre stage must have felt about the first-ever postponement of the Games.

“Inspired by the beacon of hope that lit up the Olympic Stadium today, the Organising Committee will put forth every effort toward preparing for next year’s Games, ensuring they remain in our memory forever as a symbol of unity and solidarity, as together we work to overcome the challenges of COVID-19.”

Aquatics ● FINA previously approved a $4.46 million aid package for its national federations, with block grants of $25,000 for the 160 national federations, plus another $460,000 to the continental federations. This money was to be used first for emerging elite athletes and then for coaching, facilities and training expenses.

On Tuesday, FINA announced another $2 million “to athletes selected to participate in the FINA Scholarship Programme, either at FINA Training Centres or at National Federation training facilities.” This brings the total coronavirus aid project to $6.46 million.

The FINA Scholarship Program is especially impressive, described as:

“[to] include 100 athletes from National Federations that do not currently have athletes with Olympic Qualifying Standards – 80 swimmers and 20 divers – and enable intensive training at FINA Training Centres in Senegal [Dakar], Thailand [Phuket], Russia [Kazan], and the United States [Spite Institute in Geneva, Ohio]. Each athlete is eligible for up to $2000 USD monthly for living and training expenses, with world class coaches in outstanding facilities.”

The total amount dwarfs almost all other announced pandemic relief programs from other federations (excepting FIFA, of course). It also appears to work in concert – theoretically anyway – with the elite-swimmer support program from the International Swimming League.

ISL announced a Solidarity Program last April, with payments of $1,500 per month from September 2020 to July 2021 for its contracted swimmers (up to 320 = $5.28 million) and a five-week training and competition program from mid-October to mid-November of this year that will be turned into a television series.

Reuters reported the total package is estimated at “$11 million set aside to cover wages, bonuses, ambassador payments and prize money in a condensed season” with the overall cost as high as $20 million. But that is in the future.

Athletics ● His 2019 injuries fully healed, Michael Norman went to a small meet in Ft. Worth called the AP Ranch High Performance Invitational on Monday and ran his first 100 m since high school.

Running with roommate Rai Benjamin in heat three, Norman enjoyed a favoring wind of 1.6 m/s and screamed to a win in 9.86, the best in the world for 2020. Benjamin also ran a huge lifetime best of 10.03 in second, ahead of Ronnie Baker (10.23) in third.

Justin Gatlin ran in heat two, but managed only third in a wind-aided 10.83.

Norman hadn’t run a 100 m since high school in 2016 (10.27) and now has sensational lifetime bests of 9.86/19.70/43.45. He’s only the second man in history to run sub-10:00/sub-20.00/sub-44:00: 400 m record holder Wayde van Niekerk (RSA) was the first at 9.94/19.84/43.03.

Norman now ranks no. 8 on the all-time U.S. list, tied with Carl Lewis (1991) and Noah Lyles (2019).

Benjamin’s prior 100 best was 10.69 from 2015 (!) and is close to joining van Niekerk and Norman, with lifetime bests of 10.03/19.99/44.31 … and none of these are close to being his best event!

So what about Norman for Tokyo? He’s going to have to choose; look at the schedule:

Day 2: 100 m heats
Day 3: 400 m heats (a.m.), 100 m semis and finals (p.m.)
Day 4: 400 m semis
Day 5: 200 m heats (a.m.), 200 m semis (p.m.)
Day 6: 200 m final
Day 7: 400 m final

If he tried all three, he’d be running nine races in six days, but wouldn’t the heats be nothing more than training runs?

Kenya was hit with more disciplinary actions by the Athletics Integrity Unit:

Elijah Manangoi, the 2017 World Champion at 1,500 m and a medal threat for Tokyo, was provisionally suspended for Whereabouts failures. Per the AIU, “the applicable sanction is 2 years’ ineligibility subject to a reduction to a minimum of 1 year depending on your degree of fault.”

Patrick Siele (2:11:00 marathon ‘19) was provisionally suspended for “Evading Refusing or Failing to Submit to Sample Collection.”

Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi (2:05:44 marathon ‘18) was suspended for two years from 25 February 2020, with his results annulled from 12 September 2019, for the use of the astham treatment Terbutaline.

Mercy Jerotich (2:26:52 marathon ‘17) was suspended for eight years for use of the steroid metabolite Norandrosterone after previously having a doping positive in 2015.

James Kibet was suspended for the use of Norandrosterone on 7 July.

World Athletics chief Sebastian Coe (GBR) has noted that the situations in Russia and Kenya are completely different, since the Kenyan doping problem is not state-sponsored. But isn’t it time for a World Athletics task force to be created for Kenya, to better monitor and solve the spread of doping there?

The famed ISTAF meet in Berlin (GER) is scheduled for 13 September in the historic Olympiastadion and the promoters announced Tuesday that they expect to be able to accommodate about 3,500 fans in the stands.

That’s not much in a 74,475-seat stadium, which was expected to have as many as 45,000 in attendance for this year’s meet, but it’s something.

“We are very happy that we can at least allow several thousand fans to attend thanks to our comprehensive safety and hygiene concept,” noted meet director Martin Seeber in a statement.

“Our planning is based on the safety and health of everyone.”

For a meet which usually ranks in the top two annually among worldwide, one-day invitationals, ISTAF is a study in discipline. It dropped from the IAAF Golden League when the Diamond League was formed in 2010 and is now part of the third-tier World Athletics Continental Tour Silver circuit. The result? It can put on the events it wants, on the date it wants, in the manner it wants, and with a budget it can afford.

USA Track & Field announced that an end-of-season “elite event” for 2020 has been abandoned due to the coronavirus pandemic. The statement noted that the decision came after “a unanimous recommendation advising against conducting a large mass gathering event involving travel by participants from all regions of the country” by the Covid-19 Working Group.

Skiing ● The Federation Internationale de Ski finalized the program for the Nordic World Championships in 2021 in Obertsdorf, Germany, with the large hill event for women added for the first time.

Large hill competitions for women have slowly been added to the FIS World Cup program for several years and the 2021 addition came about in part because the Obertsdorf facility has already hosted large-hill events for women multiple times.

Said German jumping star Katharina Althaus, “The level of performance in our World Cup is definitely high enough so that now is the right time to also have a women’s World Champion from the large hill.”

Triathlon ● The Endurance Sports Coalition, a trade group of long-distance running, triathlon and similar events has asked the U.S. Congress for additional help during the coronavirus pandemic.

Its letter stated in part, “Mass participation sports can be a key payer in economic recovery. Our events fill hotels and restaurants in all corners of the country, often during off-season when communities need the activity most. They also help raise awareness and tens of millions of dollars for charitable causes large and small.

“Without your help, the hometown races which have become fixtures in many communities may not be there when it is safe to run, bike, swim, and compete in large groups again.”

The worry is that with an estimated 95% of revenue – registrations and sponsorships – drying up due to the pandemic, as many as 80% of all events for 2020 could be canceled and may not be able to return.

Wrestling ● Amid long lists of canceled events in 2020, USA Wrestling announced that it’s national championships would be held in Coralville, Iowa – near Iowa City – from 9-11 October 2020.

Subject to whatever happens with the coronavirus pandemic in the area, the event will be one of the first to be held in the new Xteam Arena, slated to open in September, with a seating capacity of 5,100.

Foundation for Global Sports Development ● A total of 10 grants of $10,000 each is being offered to athletes whose training regimens have been disrupted by the coronavirus pandemic.

The application process is all online and the selection criteria are based on the impact of the pandemic on the athlete’s training and competition program, pre-COVID-19 community service efforts and “trajectory to becoming a high-performance athlete.”

The application deadline is 10 August, with the winners to be notified in mid-September.

International Olympic Committee ● The IOC honored American member Anita DeFrantz with a story noting her ascension to First Vice President of the organization in the aftermath of last week’s IOC Session.

DeFrantz, a bronze medal winner in rowing at the 1976 Olympic Games in Montreal, was on her way to Moscow for 1980 when the U.S. led a boycott in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. She sued the U.S. Olympic Committee unsuccessfully, but was recognized by the IOC for her work with the award of the Olympic Order in 1980.

Six years later, and after her successful term as a Vice President of the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee – she led the planning effort for the Olympic Villages – DeFrantz was elected to the IOC in 1986 and to the Executive Board in 1992.

It’s the second time DeFrantz has held this rank; she was also First Vice President during her 1997-2001 term as an IOC Vice President.

“The year 1980 certainly changed my life in many ways. Becoming an IOC Member never crossed my mind, but the path I took led me to that opportunity. For me, to be serving right next to another athlete who was denied the opportunity to compete at those Games means a lot. It means we will never let an athlete be denied that opportunity again. It’s a great responsibility.”

United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee ● The long-awaited U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Museum will open on 30 July, in Colorado Springs.

The facility spans about 60,000 sq. ft. and will open with 12 galleries to salute American participation in the Games, sating back to 1896. A special exhibition to honor the 1980 team, which did not participate, will be mounted during the opening months.

The Associated Press reported that the facility is projected to cost $91 million, some $15 million more than expected when ground was broken in 2017. Private funding covered $65 million and $26.2 million in support was provided by the Colorado Economic Development Commission.

Games of the XXII Olympiad: Moscow 1980 ● The IOC’s list of doping violations for each Olympic Games held since testing began in 1968 skips the Moscow Games of 1980 entirely.

According to the document, there were no positives. According to a story on the Current Time network (run by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty), we now know why:

“Soviet athletes and former members of the KGB allege that the Soviet authorities were using dirty tricks to boost performances while maintaining the appearance of a clean competition”

and

“the Soviet authorities allegedly oversaw a broad effort to tamper with athletes’ drug tests.”

A KGB department was set up to ensure that there would be no doping violations, and substituted clean specimens in place of all athlete samples:

Konstantin Volkov, who won a silver medal in the pole vault for the Soviet Union at the 1980 games, told Current Time that when it came time to hand in his urine sample for testing, an employee at the Moscow lab informed him that ‘we throw all this out’ and handed him a different container already filled with urine.

“’I said, ‘Well, I don’t have anything [in my urine]. I’m not scared,’ according to the 60-year-old Volkov. But the former pole vaulter said the lab employee insisted that ‘we don’t need accidents, so go turn this one in.’

“When asked if other athletes, including from the 70 other countries competing in the games, were doing the same, the lab employee confirmed that they were.

“’Yes, everyone is the same; no exceptions,’ Volkov recalled the lab employee saying. ‘No one will have anything [in their samples].’”

And they didn’t. Volkov was also told to take part in a doping program to ensure his success at the Games, but refused since he was not sure how the drugs would affect him in his event.

Not at all surprising. And the Soviets had prepared an elaborate doping program to ensure they would win the most medals in Los Angeles in 1984, but never got the chance, as the USSR boycotted the Los Angeles Games in retaliation for 1980.

LANE ONE: IOC’s 2019 financial statements show $2.1 billion in advances to organizing committees; will that money actually come back?

(★ Friends: Very grateful to have received 37 donations over the past month toward our server and support costs, covering about 79% of our current bill. But we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

The International Financial Reporting Standards principles are designed to allow comparison of financial information on a worldwide basis and are considered the authoritative “best practices” in the presentation of financial information.

But even a report under IFRS doesn’t tell the whole story, at least at first glance.

Take the International Olympic Committee’s just-released 2019 Annual Report, which contains detailed financial statements for last year.

The Report appears to show, at first glance, that the IOC had a pretty good year in 2019, despite not receiving a penny in television rights fees:

● For 2019, revenue totaled $694.49 million, with $548.23 million (78.9%) from its TOP sponsorship program and another $119.10 million from licensing and the IOC’s share of Tokyo 2020’s domestic marketing program.

That’s just a fraction of the $2.205 billion received in 2018, but that was an Olympic Winter Games year, with $1.436 billion received in television rights payments. But for a non-Olympic year, not bad, and marginally better than the $661.41 million surplus in the prior non-Olympic year of 2017.

● Expenses for 2019 were shown as $588.53 million, with an operating surplus of $79.96 million.

This included distributions of TOP sponsor program revenues totaling $283.41 million, primarily to the Tokyo 2020 organizers ($100.66 million), Beijing 2022 ($2.54 million), National Olympic Committees ($82.92 million) and the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee ($88.24 million).

There was also $124.32 million paid out for the “Promotion of the Olympic Movement,” which includes the IOC’s payments for the Olympic Broadcasting Service – which includes operation of the Olympic Channel – of $82.37 million and $41.95 million for cultural and heritage programs (such as the Olympic Museum).

A total of $158.00 million was used for Olympic Solidarity programs, including $13.66 million for athlete scholarships, and smaller amounts for Refugee Athlete support, Youth Olympic Games athlete support, NOC administration development, coaching programs ($6.45 million), local sports medicine programs and many more.

Spending also included $17.65 million for half of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s budget, $7.55 million to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, $2.00 million to the International Paralympic Committee and another $12.75 million in assistance to other Olympic-related organizations (like the Association of National Olympic Committees).

General operating expenses for staff salaries, office costs and the like were $188.56 million.

● The operating surplus of $79.96 million was added by good investment results, which added $142.52 million to the bottom line. So for 2019 as a while, the income statement showed the IOC with a net surplus for the year of $222.49 million.

Great, right? Not so fast.

Accounting rules classify regular income and expense items as you would expect, but when the IOC acts as a bank – advancing money to its clients, with the expectation of later payback – the numbers get harder to follow.

In 2019, the IOC advanced a total of $792.61 million in television rights money to the Tokyo 2020 organizers and $248.18 million to the Beijing 2022 organizers. And there were TV rights money advances to Paris 2024, Milan-Cortina 2026 and Los Angeles 2028. In all, the statements show that $1.069 billion was advanced in 2019.

In all, the outstanding advances to all of these organizers over time is shown as $2.092 billion in the “liabilities” section of the IOC’s balance sheet and not as expenses, since they were anticipated to be repaid in 2020 when the IOC was to receive the main share of television rights payments for the Tokyo Games.

Now those television payments are scrambled, depending on whether the Tokyo Games will be held in 2021 and whether and when the IOC will receive that TV money … or receive insurance coverage funds due to the cancellation of the Games.

● At the end of the year, the IOC’s statements showed total assets of $5.34 billion and reserves of $2.51 billion, still very, very impressive. But not as good as one might think, looking at just the bottom line.

For the current Olympic quadrennial, from 2017-19, the IOC reported total revenues of $3.6 billion, with distributions to organizing committees, International Federations, National Olympic Committees and related groups of $3.1 billion or 86.1%.

As the IOC itself notes, the organization is in “a healthy and strong financial position.”

And that position got a little stronger with Wednesday’s announcement that U.S. retail giant Proctor & Gamble had agreed to extend its TOP sponsorship commitment through the Los Angeles 2028 Games.

P&G began its sponsorship in 2010; P&G Chief Brand Officer Marc Pritchard commented:

“As we look forward to the next decade, we recognize the opportunity and the responsibility to use our sponsorship of the Olympic Games for broader impact. In the spirit of the Olympic Movement, we’re making a shared commitment through our partnership to create positive change in the world in the areas of equality and inclusion, environmental sustainability and community impact.”

The company announced a new “Athletes for Good” program which “will issue grants to the causes that Olympic and Paralympic Games athletes and hopefuls are supporting to advance important work with shared core citizenship values.” Some 52 grants will be available over the course of the next year.

But the most meaningful part of the sponsorship might be this:

“As part of the partnership, P&G will lend its expertise and thought leadership to the IOC on how to grow, accelerate and bring innovation to the IOC’s digital capabilities, products and assets. This effort supports the IOC’s strategy to engage people with the Olympic brand and maintain long-term relevance both during and outside Games time.”

Now P&G makes the IOC – and the whole Olympic Movement – look tiny. The Cincinnati-based home goods company had revenue of $67.68 billion in 2019 and produces dozens of familiar brands like Tide, Gillette, Olay, Crest and many more. Its reach could be a key for the Olympic Games to reach more deeply into everyday life, around the world.

This is a partnership to keep an eye on. At the same time, the IOC’s finance team is keeping an eye on the pharmaceutical sector and whether a vaccine is on the way prior to the Tokyo Games in 2021.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE BIG PICTURE: Tokyo 2020 moves forward slowly, but talk about the Games is in the fast lane + “Misha” creator passes at 84

Misha the bear featured in a card stunt during the Opening Ceremonies of the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow

(★ Friends: Very grateful to have received 34 donations over the past month toward our server and support costs, covering about 70% of our current bill. But we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you. ★)

A story from Japan’s Kyodo News Service summed up the current situation for the Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020 perfectly:

“[I]t seems that nothing more than a wait-and-see approach can be taken, at least for now.”

But that hasn’t stopped lots of people from talking, some of whom are worth listening to:

● The head of the Tokyo organizing committee, Yoshiro Mori – a former Prime Minister of Japan from 2000-01 – is fully aware of the issues, but also knows that the 2020 Games have a role to play in history:

“There are many things that should be fixed in Olympic operations. Even if we can’t realize it this time, it will help next time. I hope senior IOC officials will say the Tokyo Games have been a turning point for streamlining the Olympics.

“I feel they should continuously review what parts are necessary, remove a sport when a new one is introduced, or not selecting sports that require a new venue costing 30 billion to 50 billion yen ($28 to $47 million).”

He is also concerned not only with having spectators as part of the Games, but also with giving athletes the best possible Olympic experience. For example, as to ceremonies:

“If athletes have the strong will to take part (in ceremonies), we can’t tell them things from our side. (The parade) also uplifts spectators. Doing away with it is not an option.”

● The Tokyo organizers also had the problem of how to operate the Games in a “hands-off” manner, completely contrary to the pre-COVID-19 planning. A Kyodo story noted:

“Up to 28,000 journalists and technical staff have been accredited for the Olympic Games, and with the scale of media coverage varying widely between countries, outlets and sports, there is not going to be a one-size-fits-all way to manage athlete interviews.

“The organizing committee had hoped to recruit some 80,000 volunteers as well as cleaners, sales vendors and security guards but now, an organizing committee staffer said, ‘We will have to keep physical contact with athletes to a minimum.’

“Prof. Hiroyuki Kunishima, an infectious diseases expert at St. Marianna University School of Medicine in Kawasaki, said, ‘Pro baseball and J-League will serve as a test case.’”

● On the costs issue, the Tokyo organizers are also beginning meetings with their domestic sponsors, asking for more money.

Both the organizers and sponsors are in a tough spot. While the organizers need more money, sponsors have (1) already pitched in billions to support the Games, (2) are in financial peril themselves due to the coronavirus pandemic, but (3) won’t get the full impact of their sponsorship without continuing – at an additional cost – through 2021. But that decision has to be weighed against (4) the likelihood that the Games won’t happen at all, or that (5) it will take place on a reduced basis that will not generate the enthusiasm for their sponsorship that was expected.

It’s almost a no-win situation. What happens? Sponsors could chart a middle course by opting to provide some additional support, and hope for the best.

● Canada’s Dick Pound, the senior member of the International Olympic Committee told Kyodo:

“I think the principle that made the Olympic Games such a worldwide celebration still exists (and) the idea of international competition in various sports is still of interest. I think people recognize the Olympics are special.

“The concept has a universal appeal and therefore people motivated by solidarity will find a way to make it work.”

He emphasized that the Tokyo Games must be held in 2021 if at all, and that the idea of allowing only Japanese spectators at the Games really doesn’t work either:

“I think that will not be the Olympics in a sense that we understand them. We don’t know what the travel restrictions will be (in 2021), whether there are some countries that may not be permitted to travel, or permitted to enter Japan. That needs to be decided on the basis of scientific assessment of the risk on a country-by-country basis.”

At present, Japan has travel/quarantine restrictions on visitors from 129 (!) countries.

He also expanded on his comment from last week that if the Tokyo Games are not held in 2021, the Beijing Winter Games in 2022 could also be at risk:

“The political, boycott aspect about it is more problematic, in a sense that nobody knows how that develops over time. We had, back in 2008, there were many, many calls to boycott because of China’s human rights record, and in the end there was no concerted boycott. Maybe this time the situation is more serious.”

The situation in Tokyo and the existing pressure being exerted on the cost of the Games by the International Olympic Committee is being felt elsewhere, especially in Paris, the site of the 2024 Games.

As part of its report to the IOC Session last week, organizers confirmed a substantial change, reducing the size of the to-be-built Olympic Village by 16%:

“Thanks to the work in consultation with 18 NOCs, the size of the village has been optimised by reducing the total capacity to 14,250 beds. Land developers have been selected for all the village lots. Cleaning and demolition works, launched at the end of 2019, are gaining speed so that village construction can start in 2021 for a completion by the end of 2023, as planned.”

That will save millions. It will be fascinating to see whether the IOC will encourage further savings by extending its concept of housing athletes in “waves,” as proposed for the 2022 Youth Olympic Games in Dakar (SEN), now to be held in 2026. That could bring the needs for the Olympic Village down to perhaps 10,000 beds, an even more manageable project.

The Paris organizers also have the idea to hire existing organizations to run their competitions where possible, aiming for possible savings in staff. The most obvious candidates would be the management teams for the Tour de France for the road cycling races and the French Open for tennis, but who knows whether they would cost the organizing more or less than an in-house team. The Paris report noted the goal “of optimising the Games delivery model by maximising the use of existing expertise in the organisation of sport events, in France and within the Olympic and Paralympic movement.

“In this context, all the International Federations have been consulted regarding the involvement they would like to have in the delivery of their sport during the Paris 2024 Games.”

Those answers would be fascinating to read!

A sad note, on the passing of Russian illustrator Viktor Chizhikov, 84, who created the memorable “Misha” mascot for the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow.

Reuters reported that more than 60 different candidates for the Moscow mascot were submitted, but Misha was selected.

Although the Moscow Games was hit by the U.S.-led boycott, there was unanimous praise for the mascot, a smiling bear wearing a belt in the Olympic colors. It adorned countless souvenirs, especially pins of every kind, and was part of the amazing card stunts used in both the opening and closing ceremonies of the Games.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: WADA slaps U.S. ONDCP report; Russia’s Ganus says no to suicide (!), Ryan Crouser reaches 75-2!

Russian Anti-Doping Agency chief Yuriy Ganus
Russian Anti-Doping Agency chief Yuriy Ganus

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Vox Populi ● Further to last Friday’s story (17th), in which International Olympic Committee chief Thomas Bach (GER) called the 1980 Olympic boycott of the U.S. and other nations “completely unsuccessful,” Mark Conrad, an Associate Professor of Law and Ethics at Fordham University writes:

“I would take issue with Mr. Bach’s assessment of the boycott of the Moscow Olympics in 1980. Mr. Bach’s seems to equate the lack of success of the boycott with the fact that the Soviets remained in Afghanistan for years after the Games. I don’t think anyone seriously thought that the boycott would result in a Soviet withdrawal. Rather, it expressed the displeasure by the U.S. and a number of the western nations about the unjustifiable violation of the sovereign of another nation, which would have been condemned by the UN Security Council (but for the Soviet veto).

“The boycott resulted in far [less] interest and coverage in the Games in the United States and it may have limited any propaganda value the Olympic would have had on the Soviets. It is true that the U.S. and other athletes were unfortunately and unfairly victimized by the boycott and that the Soviet bloc played tit for tat in the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles. While we can honestly debate whether the boycott was the correct action to take, for Mr. Bach to say that it was unsuccessful is a questionable conclusion.”

Doping ● There is a lot going on in the doping world, starting with a short report from the World Anti-Doping Agency that noted direct contacts with staff members from the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on the allegations and demands made in a report from the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy:

“The request from the ONDCP, under threat of funding withdrawal, would simply result in entire regions not being represented around the WADA table, such as Africa or Latin America (with the exception of Brazil) and for a reduction of the seats allocated to sport. Not only are these proposals clearly undemocratic but they are simply against the founding principles of WADA which are an equal partnership between the world public authorities and the sport movement.

“It was very unfortunate that the report was written without due regard for the facts or context and with the clear intention to discredit WADA and mislead Congress. It is beyond WADA’s comprehension that such a report was produced when representatives from the U.S. Government have never raised any concerns about WADA’s governance model around the table of the WADA Foundation Board table over the past 20 years, and actually endorsed (at the November 2018 meeting of the Board) the WADA governance reforms that are now being implemented.

“On 26 June, WADA provided the ONDCP with a detailed rebuttal along with a request for the ONDCP to pass it to Congress in the name of fairness and accuracy. ONDCP did not inform congress but WADA was able to do so. WADA is encouraged, however, by the fact that a large number of governments, sports organizations and NADOs – some publicly, others in private – have rejected the ONDCP report, sought to distance themselves from it and offered strong support for WADA and the global anti-doping system.” (Emphasis added)

And the report added its now-familiar zinger at the end:

“WADA has reiterated to the ONDCP the fact that it was still willing to help and support the U.S. Government to address its domestic issues and in particular college and professional sports that remain outside the World-Anti Doping Code system, and do not offer proper protection to its athletes, rather than focusing their efforts in hindering the world fight against doping to the detriment of their own athletes.”

The report also noted the issues with parts of the proposed Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act of 2019, currently in the U.S. Senate for consideration. WADA is concerned with provisions for extra-territorial jurisdiction by the U.S. that could lead to a conflict between countries for purposes other than anti-doping.

On Russia, WADA noted that it continues to work through the data and samples it finally received from the infamous Moscow Laboratory. In April, evidence in 298 cases was sent to the relevant International Federation and continuing re-analysis of samples has turned up 61 more cases now being scrutinized, with more to come.

In Russia, a series of alarming tweets were posted last Saturday by Yuriy Ganus, the head of the Russian Anti-Doping Agency, on a report investigating alleged financial irregularities (per Google Translate):

1/”We have finished analyzing the report of Finekspertiza, which was ordered by [Russian Olympic Committee]. Nothing but disappointment and anger. By the way our relations developed, I knew that we were not one team. Today, after all, I am even more proud of our Dream Team RUSADA and I understand how far from the founders [we are].”

2/”Realizing that our study has discredited a custom report, everything moves on a different plane. And as a student of the Institute of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, I worked incl. over labs for gallows and others, I want to say that I will not voluntarily leave my life and will continue to fight.”

3/”Understanding professionally possible scenarios in a situation when a report ordered by [Russian Olympic Committee] aimed at my removal from office has become untenable, I officially declare that I love life, I will not commit suicide and consider all posthumous notes received against my will.”

This followed by two days an interview Ganus gave to Sport24.ru concerning a demand by Tina Kandelaki, a television producer, to resign (per Google Translate):

“Tina Kandelaki is an authority on anti-doping or what? Or what? Or some kind of moral standard? I want to say that I respect Tina professionally: she is a media figure, a really beautiful, bright and expressive woman. But this does not mean that statements need to be made, all the more groundless. It is certainly a phenomenon, but that does not mean that one can make unfounded statements.

“If people knew what was behind it. Everything is fabricated – it’s the nineties. There is a deliberate attack on me, this is the second attack. The first was in February of this year. But I want to say that everyone should be aware of the consequences. And then WADA warned that then they would stop testing Russian athletes.”

Against this backdrop, WADA has imposed a four-year sanction on Russia for its doping offenses and the case will be heard at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in November. Stay tuned!

Athletics ● Although the coronavirus pandemic has slowed competition, it is not stopped it. And there was a major explosion at the American Track League meet in Marietta, Georgia on Saturday.

Reigning Olympic champ Ryan Crouser (USA) had an unbelievable series that started at 22.15 m (72-8), 21.65 m (71-0 1/2), 22.24 m (72-11 3/4), 21.83 m (71-7 1/2) and then reached 22.73 m (74-7) before a final toss of 22.91 m, or 75-2!

That’s the same as Joe Kovacs reached to win the world title last year in Doha and is the equal-fourth-best throw in history:

23.12 m Randy Barnes (USA: 1990 ~ 75-10 1/4)
23.10 m Barnes (1990 ~ 75-9 1/2)
23.06 m Ulf Timmerman (GDR: 1988 ~ 75-8)
22.91 m Alessandro Andrei (ITA: 1987 ~ 75-2)
22.91 m Joe Kovacs (USA: 2019 ~ 75.2)
22.91 m Ryan Crouser (USA: 2020 ~ 75-2)

As Barnes was suspended for doping later in 1990, there are grave doubts about the validity of the two marks above, but for now they are on the list.

At the same meet, American Katie Nageotte cleared 4.83 m (15-10) for the world outdoor lead in the women’s vault.

Gymnastics ● The U.S. Olympic Trials in Artistic Gymnastics has been finalized – hopefully – for 24-27 June of 2021, again at the Enterprise Center in St. Louis, Missouri. That’s essentially the same dates as for this year and creates a two-week long extravaganza of Olympic qualifying events:

● 13-20 June: Swimming, in Omaha
● 18-27 June: Track & Field, in Eugene
● 24-27 June: Gymnastics, in St. Louis

The USA Diving Olympic Trials, originally scheduled for 14-21 June 2020, has been postponed, but with no new date announced.

The monthly report on expenses involved in the USA Gymnastics bankruptcy case was filed last week, with total legal fees sailing past the $11 million mark.

Thus far, the eight firms involved in the case – on both sides – have billed $11,070,044 and have been paid $6,270,875. The receivables go back to 31 December of 2018.

Judge Robin Moberly of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana has ordered both sides to come to mediation with “meaningful” settlement offers between 27 July and 14 August 2020. An amended plan of reorganization for USA Gymnastics, which would include an updated settlement option, is due by 27 August 2020.

At the BuZZerKaren Rosen, formerly of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, filed two excellent stories on the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee site on two stars whose Olympic hopes in 1980 were derailed by he U.S. boycott of the Games.

Of Mary T. Meagher, who went on to win three butterfly swimming golds in Los Angeles in 1984, Rosen reported about two incidents she had with then-U.S. President Jimmy Carter, both times related to events her husband, Mike Plant, was involved in:

“Meagher is one of the few 1980 Olympians with the opportunity to see President Carter, who sits in the VIP box at the baseball stadium. Meagher recalled a playoff game when a member of President Carter’s security team asked her if she minded giving up her seat. Meagher dutifully moved to the row behind.

“‘Security came back and said, ‘I’m sorry, but we need to sit here. Could you find someplace else to sit?’ Meagher said. ‘Well, the rest of the box was full, and as I was walking away, one of my neighbors said to me, ‘He screwed you again, didn’t he, Mare?’

“She just laughed it off. Meagher had also encountered the former president at the 1998 Goodwill Games, which Plant organized in New York for Turner Sports. They were in a suite and President Carter overheard someone ask Meagher, ‘So, what made you set those [1981] world records that are still standing?

“‘And I said, ‘Well the boycott of 1980,’ Meagher said. ‘I was just telling the truth because that gave me the background of training, but Mike is kicking me under the table and (Turner Sports executive) Harvey Schiller’s looking at me like, ‘Really?’

“Meagher said President Carter ‘didn’t pursue that line of questioning at all. But I feel like he needs to know that, just like we tell our kids, there are consequences to your actions.’”

Rosen also wrote of 1976 and 1984 Olympic 400 m hurdles champ Edwin Moses:

“While he believes the decision to boycott was wrong, Moses said if Team USA had competed, ‘I think we would have gotten blown away with all the doping, just like we did in 1976.’

“Moses, who is the former chair of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, suspects the Soviets would have presented an uneven playing field amid the Cold War atmosphere.

“‘I think we would have had everything from food poisoning to wrong schedules to white noise,’ Moses said, ‘and all the drug use that they were doing back then was completely unabated.’”

But he would have liked to have tried. After he lowered his own world record to 47.13 in July, East Germany’s Volker Beck won the event in Moscow at 48.70. Ridiculous.

LANE ONE: Legacy of the 1984 Olympic Games expands with “Play Equity” program with 11 L.A.-area pro sports teams

The Olympic Flame, burning brightly at the LA84 Foundation in Los Angeles (Photo: LA84 Foundation)

(★ Friends: Very, very grateful to have received 27 donations over the past month toward our server and technical support costs, which has covered more than half of our current bill. But we could use your help to cover the rest; if you wish, please donate here. Thank you.★)

Earthquakes are a known feature of the Los Angeles area.

There is fear and worry when the ground shakes even a little between Santa Monica and Indio, a perhaps a precursor to The Big One. There was such a quake last week, but it drew far too little notice.

The 11 major professional sports teams in the Los Angeles area joined together in “The A11iance: Los Angeles,” a five-year joint commitment to support “the Play Equity Fund’s social justice movement in communities across greater Los Angeles, and in Orange County amplifying the work of Accelerate Change Together (ACT) Anaheim.”

This includes Major League Baseball’s Angels and Dodgers, Major League Soccer’s Galaxy and Los Angeles Football Club, the NBA’s Clippers and Lakers, NFL’s Chargers and Rams, the NHL’s Ducks and Kings and the WNBA’s Sparks.

This is yet another legacy of the 1984 Olympic Games.

Huh?

The Play Equity Fund is a project of the LA84 Foundation – the living legacy of the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee – under the leadership of Chair Debra Duncan, a critical member of the LAOOC executive team that staged in the 1984 Games, and President and Chief Executive Renata Simril.

LA84 commissioned a first-ever Youth Sports Survey in 2016, showing what sports kids play, how often they play and who is not playing in the greater Los Angeles area and updated it in 2018. The latest data showed the need for the Play Equity movement in Los Angeles County:

● 82.3% of all county youth, ages 6-17, participate in sports. That sounds pretty good until you consider that almost 18% did not participate at all.

● Youth activity is related to parental activity levels. Children in households with regularly-active parents had a sports-participation rate of 90%. But those from households with occasionally-active or inactive parents participated at just 77%.

● Children of families with annual incomes greater than $150,000 participate at a rate of 90%, while only 71% of those from households earning below $35,000 play sports. But, the interest levels were about the same!

● 79% of Los Angeles County youth are enrolled in P.E./physical activity classes, down from 88% in 2016, with Hispanic/Latino and African-American households experiencing the biggest decline among race/ethnic groups.

● 53% participated in sports at public fields, pools or gyms, with 33% at schools or colleges and 13% at private facilities.

The role of sports-at-school was underscored emphatically. The policy recommendations that come from the study are quite clear:

“For funders and policy makers seeking to make youth sports universally available, the survey responses from low-income households are instructive. It is clear that for low-income parents cost remains an issue. Parents of young athletes must meet the costs of registration, equipment, travel, and in some cases child care and lost work time.

“These parents’ call for more school-based sports programs represents a rational solution to closing the Play Equity Gap. School sports typically provide a lower-cost option than other sport programs. Moreover, they require less travel and therefore lower transportation costs plus fewer lost work hours. Schools also provide a built-in sports infrastructure, a relatively safe environment, and a ready-made population of potential athletes. In short, school is an ideal setting for meeting kids where they are.”

This is a perfect match with the community outreach of the area’s 11 professional sports teams as well as the Ready! Set! Gold! outreach program using Olympic and Paralympic athletes as teaching and inspiration models in the Los Angeles Unified School District. This program is yet another Los Angeles Olympic legacy, created by the Southern California Committee for the Olympic Games as part of its bid for the 2016 Olympic Games, and administered in conjunction with the Los Angeles Sports Council, with support from Samsung and the Foundation for Global Sport Development.

And another validation of the 1990s decision to maintain the LA84 Foundation as a permanent entity.

“Our goal is to put bats and balls in the hands of boys and girls.”

That was the primary purpose of the Amateur Athletic Foundation of Los Angeles, according to its founding chair, John Argue, the man most responsible for bringing the Games of the XXIIIrd Olympiad to Los Angeles.

The AAF – as the LA84 Foundation was originally known – was initially designed to distribute the Los Angeles share of the $232.5 million surplus from the organization of the Games over a decade following the Games. But it became clear over time that the organization had much more to give to the community as a permanent organization and in June 2007, changed its name to the LA84 Foundation to showcase its association with the 1984 Games.

From the original transfer of $93.5 million from the LAOOC in 1985, the Foundation has spent more than $176.0 million on direct grants, sports programs and facilities in the succeeding 35 years and still held about $154.3 million as at the end of 2017. That spending does not count the enormous contribution of the Ziffren Sports Resource Center, perhaps the finest sports library in the United States, with an average of 6.6 million pages downloaded annually from its remarkable digital holdings.

In her December 2017 essay, “My New Year’s Resolution: Close the Play Equity Gap,” Simril put the challenge this way:

“Hiding in plain sight, there is a national crisis in play. I find that many people who don’t have young kids or don’t live in underserved communities aren’t aware that the opportunity to play or join a team isn’t a natural extension of childhood anymore, as so many of us remember it being when we grew up. A chasm has formed between the haves and the have-nots when it comes to sports and the basic need to run or jump, swim or compete…. or simply move.

“I am the President and CEO of the LA84 Foundation. We are a youth development organization that transforms lives and communities through support of youth sports and structured play programs. Some believe sports are just a game. Others fresh air, recreation and fitness. But that’s only part of the story. The lessons of sport and play are the lessons of life: “developing the body, mind, and spirit; the pursuit of excellence, the nurturing of character, and the call to personal integrity and responsibility…” (Jack Swarbrick, Director of Athletics, University of Notre Dame).”

Revolutions take time, as Simril noted, and that the more who get involved, the faster that problems can be solved. With the formation of “The A11iance: Los Angeles,” she now has 11 new, powerful partners to help, a continuation of the legacy of a suddenly not-so-far-away Olympic Games that opened 36 years ago a week from this coming Tuesday.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE BIG PICTURE: Bach warns of new boycott threats; Tokyo confirms venues; IOC approves Dakar for 2026 and elects five new members

The 136th IOC Session was the first by videoconference, but there were a few folks at the IOC headquarters in Lausanne (Photo: IOC)

Amidst the concerns for the staging of the next Olympic Games in Tokyo, International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach (GER) opened the 136th IOC Session with worries over an old adversary: boycotts.

From his opening remarks, made to his fellow IOC members by videoconference:

“Unfortunately, we are already seeing clear signs in some parts of the world that the one scenario is on the rise, where society and nations are driven by even more egoism and self-interest. This leads to more confrontation and to the politicisation of all aspects of life: culture, economy, health, science, humanitarian aid; even the fight against doping is already being targeted.

“During the IOC Session in January this year I already highlighted the growing misuse of sport for political purposes as one of our biggest challenges. I am afraid that this threat to sport is even bigger now. In some people’s minds the ghosts of the past are rearing their ugly heads. Boycotts and discrimination because of political background or nationality are once again a real danger.

“This is all the more unfortunate as this comes exactly 40 years after the completely unsuccessful boycott of the Olympic Games Moscow 1980 by some countries. It appears that today, some just do not want to learn anything from history: that such sporting boycotts do not have any political effect whatsoever. The Soviet army stayed nine long more years in Afghanistan after the boycott. A sporting boycott only punishes the athletes of the boycotting country and deprives their people of sharing in the success, pride and joy of their Olympic team. The only political effect the boycott of 1980 had, was to trigger the revenge boycott of the following Olympic Games Los Angeles 1984.”

Asked afterwards if his boycott concerns were aimed primarily at Beijing (CHN), host of the 2022 Winter Games, Bach replied:

“This was not related to Beijing, or Beijing only. This was related to a number of experiences we had to make in the recent months and in the recent year, where we had problems between different countries, with visas, where athletes were told by their government they should not travel to another government, where another government said ‘we will not give visas to athletes from other governments’, so we have seen this kind of boycotts growing in the – let’s say – two years about, or one-and-a-half years, and this is what I was relating to. So I did not have a specific country or a specific person in mind.”

Bach’s references were likely to the November 2018 tussle over Spanish acceptance of athletes from Kosovo to compete there under their own flag, and the February 2019 refusal of the Indian government to grant visas to two Pakistani shooters for an ISSF World Cup event, after a terror attack in Kashmir.

The Session was a transformative one for the IOC, not only for the use of videoconferencing, but for the provision to the public (!) of many (but not all) of the documents and reports filed for the Session (available here). This is a major move forward in the transparency arena and is hoped to continue into the future.

As to the news of the Session:

● The Tokyo organizers confirmed that all of the venues for the Games – including the Oympic Village – had been secured and further reported that the revised competition schedule has been completed. Hotel and contract services issues are next up.

Tokyo 2020 chief Yoshiro Mori said “safety, security and simplicity: that must be the image of the Games.” The organizers will mark one year to go next Thursday on the 23rd.

Chief Executive Toshiro Muto explained the reexamination of the Games programming will continue through the end of the year. As to simplification, the number of people beyond athletes coming to the Games is being reviewed, as well as in all service areas; the results could be announced at the next Coordination Commission meeting from 23-25 September. The estimate of added costs won’t be available until after the service-level review is completed.

Muto also confirmed that volunteers will have their assignments transferred directly to the same venues and session to 2021. Ticket holders will have their purchases maintained, but there will be refunds upon request, beginning in the fall.

Asked about the possibility of the 2020 Games being held without spectators, Bach noted:

“It’s too early to tell. It’s not what we want. We would like to see stadia full of enthusiastic fans and to give them all the opportunity to live the Olympic experience and support the athletes and this is the first line, what we are working for.”

● The Session approved the move of the 2022 Youth Olympic Games in Dakar (SEN) to 2026, at the request of Senegal’s President, Macky Sall.

● The Future Host Commissions – winter and summer – reported discussions with 15 potential hosts for future Olympic, Winter or Youth Olympic Games.

More good news came from a review of audits of the bid committee expenditures for the 2026 Winter Games, which averaged less than $5 million per city vs. $35 million per city for the 2022 Winter Games. No report was released, but would have been helpful.

● The IOC elected, as expected, five new members:

= Maria Colon (CUB), Olympic gold medalist in the javelin;
= Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic (CRO), the former President of Croatia;
= Reema Bardar Al-Saud (KSA), the Saudi ambassador to the U.S.;
= Battushig Batbold (MGL), banker and financial analyst;
= Sebastian Coe (GBR), double Olympic gold medalist and World Athletics chief.

Bach also confirmed that he will run for second term as IOC President in 2021; absent some future calamity, he will re-elected unopposed.

● The IOC also published its 2019 Annual Report, which showed reserves as of the end of last year of $2.51 billion.

The Executive Board has a short meeting scheduled for next Wednesday. Bach indicated this would primarily be for the “on-boarding” of the new members.

THE TICKER: Pound opines if Tokyo ‘21 cancels, so might Beijing ‘22; The Athletics Association launches; ISU now has $281 million in reserves!

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

XXIV Olympic Winter Games: Beijing 2022 ● Canada’s Dick Pound, the senior member of the International Olympic Committee, told Reuters this week that

“Taking the political side out of it for the moment say there is a COVID problem in July and August next year in Tokyo, it is hard to imagine there is not going to be a knock-on effect in the same area five months later.”

The Beijing ‘22 organizers have been in the shadows since the attention has all been on Tokyo 2020 (2021) due to the coronavirus pandemic worldwide. But there are multiple scenarios in which a 2022 Winter Games might not be possible, or – following the Tokyo precedent – moved back a year.

But it’s a little early to think about it now. Said Pound:

“Beijing is really not on the table at the moment and I think it would be an unnecessarily complicated thing to bring that in because we simply do not know about it yet.”

International Olympic Committee ● The IOC Executive Board certified the candidates for election this Friday when the full memberships meets online.

There are two Vice President slots open and two candidates: Australia’s John Coates – a close confidant of President Thomas Bach (GER) – and Singapore’s Ser Miang Ng. The retiring Vice Presidents are Turk Ugur Erdener – head of World Archery – and Juan Antonio Samaranch, Jr. (ESP), both of whom were elected in 2016.

American Anita DeFrantz, elected in 2017, will be elevated to first Vice President, meaning she will be first in line of succession to Bach, for one year. Bach is up for a second term (of four years) in 2021 and is expected to the re-elected easily.

Athletics“The Athletics Association aims to engage in positive dialogue with the sport’s governing body, World Athletics, and their own athletes’ commission, but will of course hold World Athletics to account when necessary and challenge them if they are not acting in the best interest of the athletes.”

That’s from Thursday’s news release, announcing the launch of The Athletics Association, which has been in formation since last year after the trimming of several events from the Wanda Diamond League program.

Those events included the triple jump and steeplechase, so it should not be a surprise that the head of the group is Olympic and World Champion Christian Taylor (USA), a triple jumper and Emma Coburn (USA), a World Champion in the steeple.

There are five “initial objectives,” including changing the Diamond League back, “gain a seat at the table with World Athletics to command real involvement,” create a welfare charter, create a membership package by January 2021 and present innovative ideas for growth in the sport.

Of the member package, the release states “The non-profit Athletics Association has been busy developing a number of support services and member benefits for athletes, including a hardship grant fund, training courses, and discounts on products. Details of the full annual membership package will be announced ahead of the full roll-out in January 2021.”

The group is governed by a 24-member board, which has positions for five continents and five event groups. Of the initial 24 members, six are from the U.S. (25%); Australia, Great Britain and New Zealand have two each and no other country has more than one.

American sprinter Deajah Stevens received an 18-month ban for whereabouts failures from the Athletics Integrity Unit Disciplinary Tribunal.

The decision noted that Stevens, who finished seventh in the 2016 Olympic 200 m in Rio, missed tests on 21 February, 18 August and 25 November 2019. Stevens did not dispute the first missed test, said her mobile phone battery had expired before the second test (so the doping control officer could not contact her) and did not hear the doorbell ringing. The third missed test came due to a changed phone number which the doping control officer was not provided with.

The panel felt, however, that the AIU’s processing in this case was slow and reduced the normal two-year penalty to 18 months, beginning 17 February 2020 to 16 August 2021.

This decision is appealable, but as it stands, Stevens would be ineligible for the Tokyo Games in 2021.

Cycling ● The organizers of the Tour de France, currently hoped to be held from 29 August-20 September, are working on multiple scenarios to control spectators and others from the riders in order to hold the race.

Some have been implemented before, including reduced traffic around the climbing stages, but could be expanded to possibly requiring spectators to wear masks, very limited access to anyone not part of a team at the starts and finish lines and fewer cars on the routes. But a ban on spectators is not part of the plans as of now.

A test of the stronger measures is expected during the Criterium du Dauphine, scheduled for 12-16 August.

Football ● The match schedule for the 2022 FIFA World Cup was announced, with four games to be played on each of the 12 days of the group stage.

The tournament will be the latest ever held, from 21 November to 18 December, with Round of 16 matches held on four consecutive days after the group matches end, meaning 16 straight days of at least two matches.

There will be two rest days prior to the quarterfinals, semifinals and medal matches, with the entire program concluded in 28 days. The compact schedule is possible because of the close proximity of all of the sites, with no air travel required for teams to move between matches.

Skiing ● The Federation Internationale de Ski (FIS) released its 2019 financial report showing CHF 35.44 million in revenue and CHF 21.09 million in operating expenses (1 CHF = $1.06).

That good news was compounded by a rise of CHF 4.15 million in investments and with a small tax-adjustment gain, the year ended with the federation CHF 18.72 million to the good.

FIS now has CHF 68.80 million in reserves and actually has considerably more than that, since it received its $44,338,644 share of television income from the 2018 Olympic Winter Games from the IOC, and only shows one-quarter of this amount in each year of the quadrennial.

(FIS, the International Skating Union and the International Ice Hockey Federation each receive an equal share from the IOC from the Winter Games broadcast revenues. The other winter federations receive half as much.)

As far as its own programs go, FIS showed a surplus of CHF 3.71 million from its Alpine World Cup program, but losses in Cross Country, Nordic Combined, Freestyle and Snowboard. This was due, according to the report, to a lack of a timing and data sponsor for these programs.

There were, on average, 38 people on staff at FIS during 2019.

Skating ● The International Skating Union has also released its 2019 financials, with CHF 39.64 million in revenue (also using a one-quarter share of the IOC TV deposit) and CHF 39.12 million in expenses. That meant a small surplus of CHF 526,860 for the year, but was bolstered by CHF 7.44 million in investment gains; most of that was transferred to reserves so the final surplus for the year was CHF 2.01 million.

The ISU moved CHF 5.00 million “to reserve for crisis situation,” indicating an awareness of the coronavirus situation and a possible collapse of future IOC revenues. The report included:

“For the next two to three years, the many commercial contracts in place are expected to ensure a reasonably stable situation. In the medium and long term however, the world-wide recession triggered by COVID-19 clearly points towards complicated income perspectives which will call for an intensified effort to secure income at previous levels and to spend the available funds in an efficient and prudent manner in the event there is a situation where reductions for certain activities will become necessary.”

There isn’t too much to worry about, however, as the ISU is one of the richest federations, holding reserves of CHF 265.56 million (not included the CHF 5 million above), or almost four times as much as FIS (in U.S. dollars, about $281.19 million). Wow!

Swimming ● Kyodo News reported that the Tokyo 2020 organizers “plan to alter the course for the open water races at next year’s postponed Summer Games due to predicted changes in the tide level.”

Enormous concern had been registered over the very high water temperatures at the planned Odaiba Park site, but any change had been resisted by the organizing committee as well as FINA. However, the tidal conditions forecast for the event dates in 2021 show a lowered water depth of as much as three feet in some areas.

The new site is expected to be elsewhere along Tokyo Bay.

The Last Word ● UCLA announced an amazing, nine-member class of 2020 to its Hall of Fame, including six Olympic medal winners!

The group includes softballer Keira Goerl (two-time NCAA champion), Lauren (Cheney) Holiday (women’s soccer: 2008 & 12 Olympic gold medalist), Kevin Love (men’s basketball: 2012 Olympic gold), Mike Powell (track & field: 1988 & 1992 Olympic silvers), Noelle Quinn (women’s basketball), Dave Roberts (baseball), Tasha Schwikert (gymnastics: 2000 Olympic bronze medalist), Russell Westbrook (men’s basketball: 2012 Olympic gold medalist) and Adam Wright (men’s water polo: 2008 Olympic silver medalist).

It’s a pretty amazing group; UCLA’s Olympic history is one of the best in the nation: 424 Bruins have made 687 appearances from 1920-2016 and won 261 medals (133-66-62). UCLA had 36 participants in Rio in 2016.

Induction ceremonies will be announced at a later date.

LANE ONE: Bach underlines partnership with organizers as Dakar 2022 YOG moved to 2026; zings art museum over Brundage bust removal

IOC President Thomas Bach (GER)

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

Critics of the International Olympic Committee portray it as an all-powerful, untouchable and cold cash machine, giving orders and taking money in while giving nothing in return.

IOC President Thomas Bach (GER) gave yet another demonstration of how far off this view is during a half-hour, online news conference following an online Executive Board meeting today (15th). In reviewing the meeting, Bach underscored the importance of the IOC’s partnerships with its Games organizing committees:

● For Tokyo 2020, while a full report is coming to the full IOC Session on Friday (17th), Bach was asked about the possibility of even holding the Games, and then possibly without spectators:

“We continue to be guided by the advice of the World Health Organization and based on this advice and based on the ever-developing situation, we are preparing multiple scenarios with regard to addressing the health situation then next July and August.”

About the scenario planning for 2021:

“It includes all different countermeasures, of preventing countermeasures, quarantine … you name it. But, Olympic Games behind closed doors is clearly something we do not want. So, we are working for a solution of the Olympic Games which, on the one hand, is safeguarding the health of all the participants and on the other hand is also reflecting the Olympic spirit.”

● But for the Youth Olympic Games in 2022, planned for Dakar (SEN), the news was much different, as the event was re-scheduled for 2026. Bach explained:

“The proposal for postponement was made by the President of Senegal, Macky Sall, in a telephone conversation with me two days ago. And I welcomed this move by President Macky Sall, and after an in-depth discussion on the subject, we decided then to establish as the new date, 2026.

“This postponement of Dakar 2022 allows the IOC, the NOCs and the IFs, to better plan their activities, which have been strongly affected by the postponement of the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, the subsequent postponements of other major international sports events and by the operational and logistical consequences of these postponements, as well as the financial consequences of the corona crisis.”

The IOC’s Executive Board agreed to the postponement request and this will be officially approved by the full Session on Friday. Bach was asked to compare the situations and why Dakar was not simply out off a year as was Tokyo:

“We are working altogether with our Japanese partners and friends to celebrate the Games next year from the 23rd of July until 8th of August, 2021. The situation of the Youth Olympic Games in Dakar can be in no ways compared to the situation in Tokyo.

“As I tried to outline, the major concern for Dakar was this proliferation of five Olympic events in three years and there, it made it almost impossible for the International Federations to prepare there, five Games in three years. Imagine the National Olympic Committees, facing the same situation , and add to this the financial constraints the IFs and the NOCs are facing already now. So there you can see that these are two totally different issues and cannot be compared in any way.”

You also have two completely different views from the actual organizing committees. The Japanese organizers and the Japanese governments want to host the Olympic Games and are willing to wait (and pay the costs) for a full year to do so. The IOC acceded to their wishes; Bach has said before that the IOC could have canceled the 2020 Games – it has the unilateral authority to do so – and received tens of millions in insurance coverage payments. But its partners want to go ahead.

In the case of Dakar 2022, the president of the country contacted Bach and asked to have the event postponed for four years. Sall was likely not that concerned about how the 2022 date impacted the sports federations or National Olympic Committees, but very worried about the costs of the Youth Olympic Games in the face of an uncertain health situation in Senegal and elsewhere.

As its partner – the government of Senegal – prefers more time, Bach is willing to give the IOC’s partner more room.

And as for those five Games in three years, it’s actually five Games in four years that would have been on tap: Tokyo in 2021, Beijing Winter Games and Dakar Youth Olympic Games in 2022, Gangwon Winter Youth Olympic Games and Olympic Games in Paris in 2024.

● Bach also announced the IOC’s cash machine is and will continue to distribute money.

An IOC statement noted that $63 million in loans has so far been distributed to 15 sports federations in aquatics, archery, athletics, basketball, cycling, golf, gymnastics, hockey, judo, modern pentathlon, rowing, rugby, sailing, taekwondo and tennis, with the first payments made in June. The five federations showcasing added sports in Tokyo – baseball-softball, karate, sport climbing, skateboarding and surfing – and received donations from the IOC, as they are not eligible to receive shares of the IOC’s television revenue distribution after the Tokyo Games.

Another $37 million has been sent to National Olympic Committees, and the IOC confirmed that its “TOP Programme allocation amounting to USD 150 million payable by end of this year.”

Even for the IOC, this was a strain and its statement noted that “In order to be able to deliver all this support, the IOC had to ask the Olympic Foundation for its assistance. The Foundation Board decided to allocate an amount of up to USD 300 million to assist the IOC in its efforts to support the actions of the Olympic Movement.”

(The Olympic Foundation is a separate entity, wholly controlled by the IOC, but which held about $900 million in assets at the end of 2018. Its assets are accounted for in the IOC’s financial statements as part of the combined entity.)

The $100 million distributed so far is part of the $150 million the IOC expects to distribute in support of sports federations and NOCs as coronavirus relief.

None of this is going to reduce the ire of the IOC’s critics, but it is a further demonstration of the IOC’s view of its senior partner and benefactor role in the Olympic Movement structure. Over four decades of working in and observing Olympic organizing committees, a common concern was IOC displeasure or outright unhappiness with regard to some element of a Games. The best reply was “What’s the IOC going to do? Take the Games away from you?”

The IOC does not want to do that, especially now that its mantra has shifted toward lower costs, and sustainability. In a previous time, Dakar would simply have forfeited the Youth Olympic Games and the race for 2026 would start fresh. But that’s not how you treat a partner.

A late question in the news conference came from Graham Dunbar of The Associated Press, who asked if the historical review now ongoing in many places about statuary and other honors – including the removal of the Avery Brundage bust from the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco – was going to be undertaken by the IOC.

Bach was ready for this one:

“Every organization has to take their own decision. We have taken note of this decision of the museum on the one hand to remove the bust of their founder; on the other hand, to keep the collection being donated by the founder and keeping displaying them. This is in their responsibility and there, every organization will take their own decision and the role of Mr. Brundage has been the focus of many studies and his history is pretty clear and has been evaluated , so we see no reason that we rewrite history in this moment.”

Brundage was a controversial figure prior to becoming IOC President from 1952-72, a known Nazi sympathizer and proponent of the 1936 Games in Berlin as head of the American Olympic Committee. His collection of about 8,000 objects created the Asian Art Museum in 1966; his bust will be removed from the lobby when the Museum eventually reopens. The director, Dr. Jay Xu said that “in addition to renaming initiatives and removing Brundage’s bust, the museum will also examine its collection to look for discrepancies in provenance and opportunities for restitution.”

Brundage’s views were out of step even in his own time, and his autocratic grip on the Olympic Movement helped create many of the IOC’s critics of today. He and Bach would certainly not have gotten along and maybe that’s one of the best reasons to appreciate the partnership message that Bach and his team have been preaching and practicing.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: U.S. colleges invest $366 million in swimming; Russian T&F chief resigns; Power-5 schools to form NCAA replacement?

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Aquatics ● As further proof of the central role that American colleges play in development of U.S. (and foreign) Olympic talent, a new study shows that some $366 million was spent to support swimming and diving programs.

The figures come from a review of the U.S. Department of Education’s Equity in Athletics database by track & field coach George Perry, also the editor of the NALAthletics.com Web site.

Perry noted that there are 682 programs in the collegiate system, at all levels; for 2018:

● $281.94 million in revenue
● $366.57 million in expenses
● ($84.63 million) overall loss

The losses come primary from NCAA schools and especially the big-school programs in the Football Bowl Subdivision. NCAA schools accounted for 93.8% of all revenue, 95.4% of all spending and 100.7% of the losses!

In fact, 36 universities lost more than $1 million on swimming & diving in 2018. The biggest money-losing programs:

(1) $4.10 million: Michigan (Big 10)
(2) $4.09 million: Tennessee (SEC)
(3) $4.06 million: Indiana (Big 10)
(4) $3.38 million: Ohio State (Big 10)
(5) $3.46 million: Auburn (SEC)
(6) $3.37 million: Texas A&M (SEC)
(7) $3.35 million: Kentucky (SEC)
(8) $3.02 million: Florida (SEC)
(9) $3.02 million: Georgia (SEC)
(10) $2.93 million: Alabama (SEC)

That’s two conferences only, and seven of 10 from one conference. Perry noted that the figures showed that schools that finished in the top 10 at the men’s and/or women’s 2018 NCAA Division I championships had a combined loss of $46.84 million on revenue of just $29.31 million and expenses of $76.14 million.

College swimming & diving spending by division and group (Image: George Perry)

These totals do not, of course, include the cost of building and maintaining the pools themselves, which are happily also used (at most schools) for recreational swimming, life safety training and other sports such as water polo. Adding all of that in takes collegiate spending on aquatics sports into the half-a-billion dollar range. Very impressive, and underscores how important American colleges are in U.S. dominance in the sport.

That’s important to note as college spending on pools and programs will be severely challenged due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Our thanks once again to Perry for his wizardry with the massive Equity in Athletics database!

Athletics ● In the face of the unpaid $5 million fine and $1.31 million in expenses due on 1 July, Russian Athletics Federation chief Yevgeny Yurchenko resigned on Monday (13th). According to a statement from the federation, Yurchenko – elected only at the end of February this year – noted:

“I am announcing today my resignation from the post of the president of the All-Russia Athletics Federation and I am launching the process of the reelection of RusAF’s administrative management. …

“I hope that the newly-elected president of RusAF will advance in the practical solution of the five-year-old complications in relations with World Athletics and will also attract ample money for the financing of the federation’s development.”

The World Athletics Council will meet on 29-30 July and it is possible that a recommendation could be made to the World Athletics Congress that Russia be expelled. The last report of the Russia Task Force stopped short of this, but recommended the fines which, so far, remain unpaid.

About the recent comments by legendary sprinter Usain Bolt (JAM) that he would come back if his coach – Glen Mills – asked him to, Mills told the Jamaica Observer only:

“It was not I who told him to retire.”

More revealing, however, was Bolt’s comment about whether he missed competition. “No, I miss the crowd. When I watch football and hear the cheers I miss that, not the training.”

The 2016 Olympic silver medalist in the women’s 20 km walk, Mexico’s Maria Gonzalez, lost her appeal of a four-year sanction for an October 2018 doping positive for a tiny amount of Trenbolone, a prohibited anabolic steroid.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport panel found that while Gonzalez originally claimed the doping positive as a result of contaminated meat, she admitted “she had not told the truth at the hearing at first instance … that her evidence had been falsified, and that documents and evidence were fabricated.”

The decision went to considerable lengths to distinguish this case from that of American long jump star Jarrion Lawson, who also had a sanction levied, but was successful on appeal – also using the contaminated meat defense – but with a very clear and convincing evidentiary support, including payment receipts for the restaurant in which he ingested the contaminated meal. Moral of the story: keep your receipts!

Gonzalez is now ineligible for four years from 16 November 2018.

Adding to the list of major events canceled by the coronavirus pandemic is the 2020 Chicago Marathon, scheduled for 11 October. Of the six World Marathon Majors which would normally be run this year, the only remaining race still hoped to be held is the London Marathon for 4 October.

Weightlifting ● While the pandemic has been shutting down competitions everywhere, it’s fair to say that the USA Weightlifting folks have been trying to figure some ways to keep their sport alive.

A program with Snap Raise was announced last week to allow donations to be made to USA Weightlifting clubs, with a goal of $100,000 to support regional events over the next 12 months.

In a further response to the pandemic, the federation announced today (14th) that it has introduced “an unlimited remote working policy for all employees.”

A statement continued, “The move has been established to reduce USAW’s physical footprint and their existing Colorado Springs HQ will be redesigned as a co-working and meeting space.” One of the benefits: “The changes will also help to widen the talent pool available to USAW with new staff able to be hired from anywhere in the country.”

Big thinking – and possibly significant future savings – from one of the smaller of the U.S. National Governing Bodies.

Doping ● U.S. Anti-Doping Agency chief Travis Tygart doubled down on his criticism of the World Anti-Doping Agency and his support of the highly-critical U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy report which – among other things – threatens to withhold U.S. funding for WADA if not given “appropriate” representation at all levels of WADA governance.

Said Tygart in an Agence France Presse story:

“What’s great is that the United States is clearly serious about reform and is willing to seek authority from Congress to withhold the money. That would have a devastating impact on WADA. Nobody wants that to happen.

“But the promises of reform have been unfulfilled. Athletes are frustrated and governments who are paying attention are frustrated.”

and

“We want a strong independent WADA. But WADA made it clear in its response that they’re going to retaliate if the money stops and they’re going to kick [the] U.S. out of WADA.

“At the end of the day, the US doesn’t have a seat on the [WADA] executive committee so it’s not going to matter. We hope they don’t do something else to us such as open up a non-compliance claim.

“But there’s no real loss because we don’t have representation as things stand today.”

This is classic power politics, but the eventual winner is not at all clear.

The International Olympic Committee announced yet another London 2012 doping positive, disqualifying Turkey’s Mete Binay, the sixth-place finisher in the 69 kg weightlifting event, for use of the banned steroid stanozolol.

This is now the 75th positive – nine during the Games and 66 afterwards – from 2012, the highest total of any Games in history.

World Games: Birmingham 2022 ● The sports program for the one-year-delayed World Games 2022 in Birmingham, Alabama was made official last week. The list includes 30 sports, 54 disciplines and 207 medal events.

According to the World Games Federation, “Completely new disciplines in The World Games official programme are Drone Racing (Air Sports), Canoe Marathon (Canoe), Breaking (DanceSport), Women’s Fistball, Parkour (Gymnastics) and Men’s Lacrosse. Women’s Lacrosse was in the official programme for the first time in 2017.”

Of note was the inclusion of American Football in the program; it had been part of the World Games in 2005 and in Wroclaw (POL) in 2017, with college players participating for the U.S. and finishing third to France and Germany.

In addition, NBA Hall of Famer and Olympic gold medalist Charles Barkley – who grew up in Leeds, Alabama and attended Auburn – was named as Honorary Co-Chair and Ambassador for the event.

The event will be held from 7-17 July in 2022, in and around Birmingham.

Collegiate athleticsSteve Dittmore, the insightful Assistant Dean in the Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation at Arkansas, tweeted last week that with the elimination of five sports, “Dartmouth makes it 36 men’s D1 programs and 27 women’s D1 programs.”

He also opined – and remember you heard it from him – “The more I think about college athletics, the more I believe the end game is Power 5 schools taking football, maybe all of their athletic programs, out of the NCAA entirely and forming their own association.”

At the BuZZer ● Check out this exchange on Twitter between long-time Olympic observer Alan Abrahamson and former – and still very influential – IOC marketing director Michael Payne:

Abrahamson:
“The #IOC session planned for next Friday 17th [July] is 4 hours. Instead of meeting for 3 days in person, just 4 hours online. Underscores how power has shifted virtually (pun intended) entirely to IOC administration from membership.”

Payne:
“What makes you think IOC administration was not already quietly discreetly running the show years ago?”

Abrahamson:
“Never said ‘twas not so the case … but a four-[hour] show makes things very plain, yes?”

LANE ONE: FINA’s own status report sees a bright future for aquatic sports, but it’s all about the Olympic Games

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

The Federation Internationale de Natation (FINA) – the international federation for aquatic sports – is at the same time both celebrated and reviled.

Founded in 1908, it is outwardly one of the most successful federations in the world, with $107 million in reserves at the end of 2018, a vibrant World Aquatics Championships every two years and annual “World Cup” programs of varying success in each of its six disciplines: swimming, open-water swimming, diving, high diving, artistic (formerly synchronized) swimming and water polo.

On the other hand, the recently-released governance study by the Association of Summer Olympic International Federations (ASOIF) had FINA as one of the worst IFs, ranking in the lowest tier. Along with the federations for judo, weightlifting, and new-for-Tokyo 2020 federations for baseball-softball, surfing and skating, FINA scored between 84 and 119 points, out of a possible 200. (The top federations scored from 170-187: badminton, cycling, equestrian, football, rugby and tennis.)

So which is it?

There are significant clues in a new FINA report, entitled “FINA Strategic Plan 2018–2021. Mid-way Status – June 2020.” Covering 89 pages, this is a progress report on the original set of goals – the FINA Strategic Report 2018-21 – adopted three years ago.

The report notes the original goals, what has been done to date and what is still being pursued. There is some good work being done:

§1.3: Raising Standards: programs for better management of national federations, including educational and financial support, plus “Scholarships Programme, Schools for Officials, Clinics for Coaches and Officials, Coaches Certification Programme, Development Centers, Olympic Solidarity Programmes.

“203 National Federations have been provided with support, and have been involved in any of these activities, redistributing almost 20 Million USD.”

§3.2: Anti-Doping: “FINA signed a contract with the International Testing Agency (ITA). Starting from the 1st January 2019, out-of-competition testing programme is independently managed by ITA, including testing management and athlete biological passport.”

Also: “Active involvement, including presentations and panel discussions, of Athletes during FINA World Aquatics Conventions and other major gatherings.” (Important, since athletes often ignore these during major competitions.)

§3.3: Education and Compliance: “Pathway developed with progressive learning opportunities for all Officials, Referees and Judges for all the Aquatics Sports ensuring that those officiating at FINA or Olympic competitions have been duly certified by FINA.”

§5.1: Participation: “Strong increase (14%) in number of [national federations] participating at the FINA World Championships and competing among all six Aquatics disciplines (results of 2019 compared to 2017).”

§6.1: Business strategies: “FINA Athletes Committee members started to attend various FINA competitions, with the aim to maintain direct dialog with the Athletes.” (This was not being done?)

But at the same time, there were inexplicable entries such as:

§2.1: Governance: “To establish policy for publication of Minutes of FINA Executive and FINA Bureau meetings.

“To develop and release a FINA Good Governance document.”

No wonder the federation received such a low governance grade in the ASOIF study!

§5.2: “Goal: 100% of Athletes Competing in FINA Events Have Coaches Certified by FINA.”

§10.3: Ongoing Investment: “To facilitate development of solutions for installations for the organisers of the FINA major events to achieve best return on investments.”

In addition, it’s worth noting that FINA has, for some time, paid the travel and accommodations expenses of participants in its World Championships, something that very few federations do. This was not mentioned anywhere.

FINA also has worthwhile goals for the future, such as working with national and international groups to prevent drowning through its “Swimming for Life” initiative, and to extend the total member registrations of its worldwide national federations from 34 million to 50 million in the next four years.

But there is no information on “how” these goals will be achieved. Further, there is significant attention paid to FINA’s commercial future and how it can expand swimming’s impact worldwide, but no indication on how it will happen:

“FINA Marketing Department to produce advice and guidelines to Athletes on ‘now’ and ‘next’ in terms of staying in touch with fans and sponsors and ideally increasing relevance for these.”

“Capturing the attention of audiences worldwide, FINA events will create unique and valuable entertainment properties that attract and grow audiences for every discipline.

“Develop a consistent calendar of exciting events to include all disciplines.”

But once you read and re-read the report, the core concept for growth comes through, and although easy to pass over the first time, it is stated with clarity in §6.3:

LEVERAGE OLYMPIC GAMES TO PLACE AQUATICS CENTRE STAGE”

And reinforced by the headline of §9.2:

“REMAIN A VALUABLE AND COMMITTED PARTNER TO THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE”

The report notes that “FINA has been confirmed as the IF at the Olympic Games bringing the biggest number of Athletes, representing the most countries and territories,” which is completely untrue, at least as to athletes. Aquatic sports in Rio 2016 had a combined 1,437 entrants per the authoritative Olympedia site, vs. 2,270 for Athletics. For Tokyo in 2021, the quota for Athletics was shaved to 1,900, with FINA’s sports at a combined 1,410. The aquatic sports have 49 Olympic events combined to 48 for Athletics.

FINA’s strategy for its relationship to the Games is clear and stated thus:

“To continue promoting High Diving to be included in the Olympic programme.

“To continue the efforts for securing an increase in number of participating Athletes (in Diving, Water Polo, Marathon Swimming).

“To further develop and present arguments for the inclusion of additional Swimming events (e.g. mixed relay and 50m events in the programme of future Olympic Games), Mixed duet events in Artistic Swimming, etc.”

This is going to be really difficult since the International Olympic Committee has already committed to reducing the total athlete count for the Games to 10,500 from 2024 onward. But FINA will be asking for more and more.

And the Olympic Games is the keystone of FINA’s plan to expand interest in its own events, per the to-do item in §8.2 on building audiences:

“To develop communication strategies to more effectively transfer the massive interest for Aquatic Sports at Olympic Games into similar interest at FINA’s events (e.g. FINA Swimming World Cup, FINA Diving World Series, etc.).”

This is really interesting for several reasons:

(1) FINA has stated bluntly what has become obvious, but that no wants to say: the Olympic Games are important and nothing else is. Back in March, legendary Australian coach Bill Sweetenham said in an interview, “The Olympics is the only competition that matters, the rest are pretenders! They should prioritise the Olympics first and foremost as, historically, no-one, but no-one, recognises or remembers any other result or competition.”

Now FINA is saying it, but more politely.

(2) There was no mention in the entire Mid-Way Status report of either the Olympic Channel or the subscription-based FINAtv program, both of which were hoped-for promotional panaceas.

(3) While there was notice taken of the increase in FINA’s social-media audiences in recent years – now about 809,000 combined, exclusive of Chinese apps for which data was not publicly listed – no information was listed about FINA’s Web site traffic or engagement.

FINA is to be congratulated for sharing publicly its Mid-Way Status report, something many other federations would not do. The federation has achieved much, but by its own reckoning, is still stuck in the valley of Olympic sports which have not broken free of the Games as its primary vehicle for public recognition.

To its credit, FINA gets it and included in its to-do list the ultra-difficult task of “To further develop [a] plan for FINA Partners to make investments in the FINA programmes as a
supplement or alternative to involvement in FINA competitions.”

With no end in sight to the coronavirus pandemic, that might be job one.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: Houlihan shatters own U.S. 5,000 m mark; three winter stars pass this week; Biles doesn’t want USAG settlement money

American distance star Shelby Houlihan had her final doping ban appeal turned down (Photo: jenaragon94 via Wikipedia)

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus

Athletics ● After the fun of the Weltklasse Zurich round-the-world meet on Thursday came a serious – and successful – attempt at the American Record in the women’s 5,000 m on Friday evening.

In the second “Portland Intrasquad” meet staged by the Bowerman Track Club, Shelby Houlihan outlasted Karissa Schweizer to maul Houlihan’s 2018 mark of 14:34.45 by finishing in stunning times of 14:23.92 and 14:26.34!

There were seven starters in the race and steeple star Colleen Quigley paced the group through almost 2,000 m. Another steepler, 2017 Worlds silver winner Cortney Frerichs, then took over for two laps, followed by Elise Cranny, with Houlihan and Schweizer running behind them. Houlihan took over with three laps to go, and charged home in 68.9, 65.8 and 61.5 to claim another American Record; she also owns the 1,500 m mark at 3:54.99 (2019).

How good was this?

Houlihan’s 14:23.92 would have been the no. 4 performance of 2019, with only Hellen Obiri and Agnes Tirop (KEN) and Sifan Hassan (NED) ahead of her. Compared to the Doha World Championships final, Houlihan and Schweizer would have been 1-2, ahead of Obiri’s winner of 14:26.72! Houlihan moves to no. 12 on the all-time world list.

Schweizer, still just 24 and only two years removed from her last of five NCAA track titles at Missouri, took nearly 20 seconds off her best – from 14:45.18 for ninth in Doha last year – to move to no. 14 all-time in the event.

So what about Tokyo (assuming there is a Tokyo): is a 1,500/5,000 double possible for Houlihan?

It won’t be easy. The women’s 5,000 m – as currently scheduled – has heats on Day 1 and the final on Day 4 in the evening. The problem is that the 1,500 m heats are on the morning of Day 4, with the semis on Day 6 and the final on Day 8.

But after two days of rest, perhaps a morning 1,500 heat won’t be too taxing. At Doha last year, the three heats were won in 4:03.88, 4:08.32 and 4:07.27. Houlihan might be in such superb shape as to be able to handle that load. We won’t know for a while, and the schedule could be changed between now and then.

The men’s 5,000 m was no slouch either, with Canada’s Mo Ahmed claiming a national record and moving to no. 10 all-time at 12:47.20. He was trailed by American Lopez Lomong, finishing in 12:58.78 and becoming the ninth American to break 13 minutes outdoors. Ahmed ran his final four laps in 3:58.6 and his final 400 m was 57.45. Wow!

With a possible expulsion recommendation coming at the World Athletics Council meeting on 29-30 July, Russian Athletics Federation chief Yevgeny Yurchenko told Match TV:

“Withdrawing the right of the neutral status participation is a monstrous violation of athletes’ rights. I believe that we must go to court to protect this right.”

In the meantime, Vadim Devyatovskiy, the 2008 Olympic hammer silver medalist and now head of the Belarus Federation said on Wednesday:

“It’s too early to talk about any decisions and steps but we are closely following the development of events and, if we receive offers from Russian athletes, of course, we will consider them.

“If these athletes are forced to miss the Olympics or, moreover, finish their careers, this will be a loss not only for the Russians, but also for world athletics.”

The Russian federation missed a scheduled $5 million payment of a fine by World Athletics for its past doping violations on 1 July, along with a $1.31 million payment for expenses related to the federation’s investigations.

Current world champions Maria Lasitskene (high jump) and Anzhelika Sidorova (pole vault) have both complained publicly about the quagmire faced by current Russian athletes and noted that their competitive future may lie elsewhere.

In a video interview with the Variety After-Show, retired sprint legend Usain Bolt said he’s now open to returning to the track … if he was called by coach Glen Mills:

“If my coach came back and told me, ‘Let’s do this,’ I will because I believe so much in my coach. So, I know if he says, ‘We’re gonna do this,’ I know it’s possible.”

Well?

Yet another Kenyan doping positive was announced by the Athletics Integrity Unit, with Alex Oliotiptip suspended for two years for “whereabouts” failures, from 19 July 2019.

Kenya now has a total of 57 people on the AIU’s “Global List of Ineligible Persons,” second only to Russia.

Dean Cromwell was one of the outstanding track & field coaches in American history, guiding dozens of star athletes to 12 NCAA team titles during his long career (1909-48, except for 1915) at the University of Southern California.

But he was also a Nazi sympathizer and has long been credited – although without absolute proof – with pulling two U.S. sprinters who were both Jewish from the American 4×100 m relay at the 1936 Berlin Games.

In those days, the top two finishers at the U.S. Trials got to run in the 100 m, and finishers 3-4-5-6 in the relay. While Jesse Owens and Ralph Metcalfe went 1-2 in the 100 m final, the four relay men should have been Foy Draper and Frank Wykoff (both USC runners) and Sam Stoller and Marty Glickman, both Jewish.

With no concern from the anti-Semitic Avery Brundage, head of the American Olympic Committee, Stoller and Glickman were replaced by Owens and Metcalfe and the team won easily, equaling the world record in the heats and setting a new standard of 39.8 in the final.

The track at USC has long been named for Cromwell, but that is now under review after a student group wrote to the USC administration asking about multiple facilities on campus named for individuals whose actions or writings are not in line with the “university’s values.”

The university issued a statement to the Los Angeles Times, noting “The Task Force on University Nomenclature is looking at buildings, monuments, and symbols across campus.”

Aquatics ● FINA, the international federation for the aquatic sports, has quietly approved a $4.46 million support program for its national and continental federations.

A total of $4 million will be available in blocks of $25,000 for the 160 national federations, plus another $460,000 to the continental federations.

There are strings attached: the national federations who had swimmers participating as “universality” (i.e., non-qualifier) athletes at the 2019 World Championships must first allocate funds to four such athletes, and then to the next four who show promise to be qualifiers for the Tokyo Games.

Following that, funds can be used for coaching, access to facilities, training camps, competitions (if held) and athlete living expenses.

It’s a big grant of funds, but with so many federations, will have a mild impact on any one of them. Still, it’s a positive reflection of FINA’s shepherding of funds, with $107 million in reserves at the end of 2018.

The International Swimming League announced a Solidarity Program last April, with payments of $1,500 per month from September 2020 to July 2021 for its contracted swimmers (up to 320 = $5.28 million) and a five-week training and competition program from mid-October to mid-November of this year. Reuters reported the package is estimated at “$11 million set aside to cover wages, bonuses, ambassador payments and prize money in a condensed season” with the overall cost as high as $20 million.

Fencing ● The Federation Internationale de Escrime (FIE) joined the federation support party, announcing Friday that CHF 1,000,000 ($1.06 million U.S.) has been allocated for support of athletes, federations and judges.

TASS reported “every national federation and confederation will receive financial support. Besides, the organization will cancel 2020 membership fees and organizational fees for the 2020/21 season. One athlete from each national federation will receive a financial grant to take part in 2021 continental junior championships.”

The funding comes from FIE chief Alisher Usmanov, a Russian mining and metals billionaire whose donations have been keeping the federation afloat for more than a decade; he was elected as FIE President in 2008.

Gymnastics ● In a lengthy feature in Vogue, superstar Simone Biles reviewed her situation, the difficulties caused by the postponement of the Tokyo Games and more. She notably said of the continuing Larry Nassar abuse scandal and lawsuit:

“We need to figure out why it happened, when it happened, and who knew what, when. …

“We can’t feel comfortable promoting our sport if we fear that something might happen like this again because they’re not doing their part. And the hardest part for us is we’ve always done our part. We’ve always represented the U.S. to the best of our ability, and all the time, most of the time, every time I’ve represented, come back with gold medals. It’s like: We’ve done our part. Come on.”

She also noted that the delay of the Games meant: “Another year of dealing with [USA Gymnastics]. That, I don’t know if I can take.”

As to the proposed settlement submitted by the federation’s legal team, now being revised: “It’s like, at the end of the day, I don’t want your dirty money.”

A new abuse inquiry was announced in Great Britain, following allegations in artistic and rhythmic gymnastics.

Both physical and emotional abuse has been cited, with a 10-year-old gymnast stating she was locked in a closet by her coach.

The chief of British Gymnastics, Jane Allen, said “It is clear that gymnasts did not feel they could raise their concerns [with us] and it is vital that an independent review helps us better understand why so we can remove any barriers as quickly as possible.”

An outside investigation has been started; UK Sport, the agency which funds Britain’s Olympic programs, issued a statement that “These allegations relating to the treatment of young athletes within gymnastics are shocking and upsetting. There is absolutely no place for any sort of bullying or abuse in sport and anyone responsible for such behaviour must be held accountable, with support offered to those affected.”

Skating & Skiing ● Very sad news this past week of the death of three winter-sport stars:

● On 8 July, Australian snowboarder Alex “Chumpy” Pullin, 32, died while spearfishing off an artificial reef near Gold Coast. He was a three-time Olympian in 2010-14-18 and the World Champion in Snowboard Cross in both 2011 and 2013. He had retired only this year.

● On the same day, Norway’s 1992 Olympic gold medalist in the Slalom, Finn Christian Jagge, passed away at just 54 years old. Winner of seven World Cup Slaloms from 1991-99, he retired in 2000, but passed away from what was reported as an “acute illness.”

● On Friday, Dutch Short Track star Lara van Ruijven, 27, died from complications of an autoimmune disorder in Perpignan, France. She was the 2019 World Champion in the 500 m and won an Olympic bronze in 2018 in the 3,000 m relay. She took ill at a training camp in late June in France and was hospitalized, but did not recover.

Our condolences to the families and friends; passing at 32-54-27 is just not fair.

Doping ● A message on the Russian messenger application Telegram accused Russian Anti-Doping Agency chief Yury Ganus of corruption. Agence France Presse reported:

“The ‘Post-Truth’ channel said Ganus may have appropriated at least 110 million rubles ($1.55 million) over two years in his capacity as head of RUSADA.

“Ganus, who has for many months sharply criticised Russia’s sports leadership over the ongoing doping ban, held an emergency press conference Friday to denounce the allegations, which he said were ‘revenge’ and ‘the start of a campaign to discredit RUSADA’.”

It isn’t easy to do anything, anywhere.

XXIV Olympic Winter Games: Beijing 2022 ● China canceled all international sporting events for the remainder of 2020, but exempted test events needed to prepare for the 2022 Winter Games. According to the Associated Press:

“China has largely contained local transmission of the coronavirus but remains on guard for imported cases.

“The General Administration of Sports cited ‘science and order’ in issuing its plan to proceed on Thursday.”

There is doubt in some quarters that the coronavirus pandemic may not be sufficiently controlled to allow the 2022 Winter Games to take place, just six months after the 2020 Tokyo Games conclude in 2021.

ATHLETICS: Lyles runs 18.90, but only for 185 m at Weltklasse Zurich Inspiration Games, as Kendricks, Felix, Moline and Morris impress

Noah Lyles (USA) on his way to the 2019 Diamond League 200 m title in Brussels (Photo: IAAF)

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

It wasn’t the Weltklasse Zurich we know, but it was fun. Especially for Noah Lyles.

The American star, the 2019 World Champion at 200 m, ran all by himself at the IMG Academy in Bradenton, Florida. Battling a blast of wind at the start, he blew through the turn and showed his best-in-the-world finishing speed in the straight to finish in 18.90.

18.90? World record? Wind-aided? Timer malfunction? Actually, none of the above.

As it turns out, Lyles was lined up at the wrong start mark and ran only 185 m, accounting for the crazy time, into a 3.7 m/s headwind! But it was still impressive.

There’s no doubt Lyles was fastest on the day, but the actual winner became France’s Christophe Lemaitre, running 20.65 in Zurich, with Churandy Martina (NED) in 20.81 in Papendal (NED).

The meet was indeed inspiring, with a few great athletes tantalizing us with what we have missed due to the coronavirus pandemic. Despite being held in seven (!) different venues worldwide, the synchronized three pictures-on-one screen format worked pretty well and was a technical marvel produced by Swiss Timing and Swiss Television.

Americans won two of the four men’s events and the U.S. won all four of the women’s competitions, with Allyson Felix winning twice (results are here). The highlights:

Men/100 yards: This was the one “normal” event, with all three competitors running in the same place at the same time, in Bradenton, Florida.

Canada’s Andre De Grasse came on in the final few strides to edge the fast-starting Jimmy Vicaut (FRA), with Jamaican Omar McLeod third in 9.87. The times were especially slow due to a headwind of 3.4 m/s.

Men/200 m: Lyles showed that he is going to be hard to beat in any event, after running a windy 9.93 last week and a fast 185 m race today. His 18.90 time could be projected to about 20.45 for 200 m, but with a 3.7 m/s headwind that hindered him – according to the tables – by about 0.22. So he ran, by himself, the equivalent of a windless 20.23 at sea level?

Interestingly, he ran in lane five, instead of his favored lane seven in most Diamond League meets.

Lemaitre, running solo in Zurich, ran strongly on the straightaway to win in 20.65.

Men/Pole Vault: France’s Valentin Lavillenie failed to clear his opening height of 5.36 m (17-7), replacing his superstar brother Renaud, out with an injured left thumb.

World Champion Sam Kendricks of the U.S. cleared four heights in a row, through 5.66 m (18-6 3/4), while Poland Piotr Lisek alternated misses and makes through the same height. The issue was decided at 5.76 m (18-10 3/4), with Kendricks making it on his third try (in Bradenton) and Lisek missing his three attempts, in Karlstad (SWE).

Kendricks kept going, clearing 5.81 m (19-0 3/4), then missing three times at 5.91 m (19-4 3/4).

Men/Triple Jump: Portugal’s Pedro Pablo Pichardo was the only competitor in Lisbon and was in great form “at home,” with wind-aided jumps of 17.20 m (56-5 1/4) and 17.40 m (57-1) in the first two rounds.

Neither of the Americans – Omar Craddock at Mt. SAC and Olympic champ Christian Taylor, in Bradenton – really got going. Craddock managed a best of 17.04 m (55-11) in the second round and Taylor, looking rusty, got it together in the final round for a very wind-aided 17.27 m (56-8) to finish second.

Pichardo finally got a legal jump, logging 17.17 m (56-4) on his final try.

Women/150 m: This race was run off the final turn and into the straightaway, with Felix powering strongly on the straight and “winning” in 16.81. Olympic 400 m champ Shaunae Miller-Uibo (BAH) took the turn slowly and then came on, clocking 17.15 for second and Swiss Mujinga Kambundji third in 17.28.

“It was very strange and I feel like sort of practice but not even because there’s really no teammates or anything,” said Felix afterwards. “It’s hard to challenge yourself, so I think that’s the big thing was running solo. This was fun. I can’t wait ‘til we do it in person.”

Women/300 m hurdles: It was hoped that 400 m world-record holder Dalilah Muhammad might be able to challenge the best ever in this event, but was replaced at the last moment by fellow American Georganne Moline.

No problem! Moline – finally healthy after foot surgery last August – ran strongly from the start and “won” in a very good 39.08, trailed by Swiss Lea Sprunger (39.25 in Zurich) and Czech world-record holder Zuzana Hejnova (CZE: 40.97 in Papendal/NED).

Women/Pole Vault: It took a grand total of one jump for American Sandi Morris to win this event, with a clearance at 4.56 m (14-11 1/2). Olympic and world champ Katerina Stefanidi (GRE) went out at her opening height of 4.46 m (14-7 1/2), jumping at Mt. SAC and Swede Angelica Bengtsson cleared 4.46 m (14-7 1/2) for second, but bowed out at 4.56 m.

Morris – in Bradenton – cleared 4.66 m (15-3 1/2) on her second try, but then missed all three trials at 4.76 m (15-7 1/2), made all the more difficult by a stiff crosswind.

Since this was “Zurich,” there had to be a women’s relay, in this case 3×100 m. The U.S. trio of Candace Hill, Tianna Bartoletta and Felix passed the stick nicely at Mt. SAC – with no practice – and finished in 32.25, with the Swiss in 32.50 (in Zurich) and the Dutch team in 32.94 (in Papendal).

Asked about any relay practice, Felix deadpanned, “We literally just did it.”

It was strange to see the empty stadiums, of course, but the renovated Hilmer Lodge Stadium at Mt. SAC looked inviting and should be a grand stage for future editions of the Mt. SAC Relays and many more events.

Besides Lyles, Felix and Moline were especially impressive, working their way back from pregnancy and surgery, respectively. It will be great to see them again, whenever.

NBC will have replays of the meet at 5:30 p.m. Eastern today (9th) on NBCSN, then on the NBC Olympic Channel at 6 p.m. Eastern on Friday (10th) and 6:30 p.m. on Monday (13th).

LANE ONE: USOC’s transformative spokesman, Mike Moran, passes at 78

Mike Moran (left) and Peggy Fleming, on the 50-year anniversary of her 1968 Winter Games figure skating gold. (Photo: Ford McClave for the Colorado Springs Sports Commission, courtesy of Mike Moran)

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

It’s always sad to lose a friend.

It’s worse when a giant in his field leaves too early.

That was Mike Moran, the tall, elegant and ultra-professional spokesman for the United States Olympic Committee from 1979 to 2003, who passed away from complications related to pneumonia at 1:25 p.m. on Wednesday (7th) at Penrose Hospital in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

He was, in many ways, a living link between the USOC as it had been prior to the passage of the Amateur Sports Act of 1978 (now the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act), and the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee of today, headquartered in Colorado Springs.

Moran was the highly-respected sports information director at the University of Colorado in Boulder, having come from his alma mater, the University of Nebraska-Omaha in 1968. At that time, the USOC was rarely in the public eye except during Olympic years, occupying a slender, six-story building from 1910 at 57 Park Avenue in New York, now the United Nations Mission for the Republic of Guatemala. The USOC’s quadrennial budget was about $4 million.

Public relations was hardly a priority at the old USOC, which hired its first Director of Public Information only in 1967 in Bob Paul, who had been the Sports Information Director at the University of Pennsylvania and came to the USOC from the Amateur Athletic Union, which governed almost a dozen sports.

Paul was one of just 10 USOC staff members who came west to Colorado in mid-1978 as the organization re-located to a former Air Force base, thanks to the efforts of retired Col. F. Don Miller, since 1969 the USOC’s Executive Director.

That summer, Moran was helping the USOC at the inaugural National Sports Festival in Colorado Springs and as one thing led to another, he was offered the opportunity to join the USOC and eventually succeed Paul as the organization’s spokesman.

It was almost a comical pairing. By 1979, the short, bespectacled Paul was 62, with a growly Eastern accent and an ever-present cigar. Moran, 6-4, handsome and in his mid-30s, towered over him and preferred the best wine he could find.

But the Olympic world was changing, especially in the U.S.

Not only was the USOC now firmly planted in the West, the 1984 Olympic Games had finally been awarded to Los Angeles and with the passage of the Amateur Sports Act, the future of the U.S. Olympic Movement was firmly in Colorado Springs.

As spokesperson, Moran was in the thick of some of the most electrifying years in U.S. Olympic history. Less than a year into his tenure as spokesperson came the Olympic Winter Games in Lake Placid, New York, and the “Miracle on Ice” performance of the U.S. hockey team.

Of the immortal win over the USSR, he remembered, “I had watched the game using a seat in the press area, and in the dizzying final moments was repeatedly whacked on my back by famed Detroit News sports columnist Joe Falls.

“I woke up the next morning, Feb.23, and I was black and blue from my neck to the middle of my back from Joe’s whacking me with his metal note pad holder.”

Less than two months later, Moran was in the center of another media maelstrom as the USOC’s House of Delegates – under enormous pressure from Carter Administration – voted 1,704-697 not to attend the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow. He later called it the worst day in U.S. Olympic history.

Things calmed down, as the next Games would not be held until 1984 – the Winter and Olympic Games were celebrated in the same year back then – and Moran had time to consider the opportunities ahead. And what he did changed the Olympic Movement.

The USOC held its third National Sports Festival in Syracuse, New York in 1981, and Moran wanted to take advantage of the opportunity to begin showcasing American stars who had missed out on Moscow and would be looking forward to Los Angeles. But he and Paul couldn’t hope to support hundreds of reporters covering all of the sports. Most of the U.S. National Governing Bodies had little or no public relations help at all, so Moran reached out to his friends in collegiate sports information.

Experienced, nationally-known SIDs like Bill Hancock of the Big Eight Conference – now the Executive Director of the College Football Playoff – and Bob Condron at Southern Methodist, Don Bryant from Nebraska, Don Kopriva from Wisconsin-Parkside and Debby Jennings from Tennessee all came to help; in fact, 22 in all. At a time when few women were in this trade, Moran had five on his team in Syracuse. At least one SID was posted at each venue to help the media meet with the athletes. Coverage expanded as media awareness of the athletes exploded.

Moran’s team grew in experience and expertise as the 1984 Olympic Games came closer, and while Paul remained in charge of assigning U.S. media credentials for the Games, the previously-unheard-of concept of placing a press officer with each U.S. team was successfully tested for the 1984 Winter Games in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia, and then more than two dozen came aboard for the summer Games in Los Angeles.

There were only handful of nations which had even one press attache from their National Olympic Committee in Los Angeles, and NOC leaders from around the world were astonished (horrified?) to learn of the idea of having a dedicated press officer for each sport at the Olympic Games. But Moran and his team pulled it off brilliantly.

As the head of press operations for the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee, I was delighted. Now my Venue Press Chiefs didn’t have to hunt down American athletes for U.S. reporters: the USOC press officers would take care of it.

And when Paul exercised his authority a little too strongly in accreditation matters, Moran asked politely for an extra credential here and there to even things out … and we were only too happy to oblige (as long as he didn’t tell anyone).

Today, many NOCs have sophisticated media support operations at the Games to work with the athletes, coaches and media. That’s a legacy you can trace directly to Mike Moran.

Mike continued as the head of the USOC’s media program through 2003. Condron actually joined the USOC as the head of the media services program in January of 1984 and continued into January 2012, when he retired.

There were lots more highlights and some lowlights: the Tonya Harding-Nancy Kerrigan circus prior to and during the 1994 Winter Games, the joys and sorrows of the return of the summer Games to the U.S. in 1996 in Atlanta, the Salt Lake City bid scandal in 1999 and then a brilliant execution of the 2002 Winter Games there.

Miller passed away in 1996; Paul died in 2011 at age 93 and Moran wrote an extraordinarily warm remembrance for the College Sports Information Directors of America Web site.

Moran’s longtime friend Christine Brennan of USA Today tweeted after the news of his passing broke:

“He knew more about the U.S. Olympic movement than anyone. A class act always, he answered every question, including at 1 am in Lillehammer in 1994 when Tonya was allowed to compete.”

Moran retired in 2003 and later became the Senior Media Consultant for the Colorado Springs Sports Corporation. He was an excellent Master of Ceremonies at many awards and discussion events, equally at home quizzing politicians and performers as well as athletes (as with Peggy Fleming on the 50-year anniversary of her 1968 figure skating gold in 2018, above).

But he had surprises ahead, as in the summer of 2017:

“I underwent open-heart, triple bypass surgery on August 18, a total surprise. I was in good shape prior to the surgery, and my recovery is just beyond the standard. They sent me home after just three days and I have completed a rigorous cardio therapy exercise class three times a week at the Audubon complex. I upped my results each and every time. I weigh 204 after losing 25 pounds and plan to stay right there for the future.”

Earlier this year, he wrote dramatic, 40-year remembrances of two of his most vivid experiences in the Olympic world: the Miracle on Ice in Lake Placid, and the USOC vote to skip the Moscow Games.

As the coronavirus stopped life everywhere in the spring, he began sending a daily summary of top-line Olympic news to his friends in the U.S. and around the world. He suffered a fall earlier this year and had to be hospitalized, but recovered. And now we have lost him.

Rest in peace, Mike. You’ve earned it. We will carry on.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Koike crushes 21 others for re-election; AIBA-WBA tie-up coming? WADA’s Banka says USADA wants to take over

World Anti-Doping President Witold Banka (POL)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020 ● Incumbent Yuriko Koike won a second term as governor of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government on Sunday, receiving 59.7% of the vote with her next closest challenger at 13.8%.

Her vote total of 3.661 million is the second-highest ever, with 55% of the eligible voters turning out for the election.

Koike, 67, crushed 21 other candidates in a wild (but brief) election campaign, with a couple of candidates promising to close down the 2020 Olympic effort and move on. Her overwhelming victory is a plus for the 2020 Games, as she has guided the effort that saw the Tokyo government shoulder most of the costs, including the construction of new facilities.

The Japan Times wrote that her expected win “was a tacit sign that a majority of voters in Tokyo trust Koike to continue her battle against the novel coronavirus.” And a major sigh of relief for the Tokyo Olympic organizers and the International Olympic Committee.

Archery ● An impressive $190,000 in grants was distributed to 35 athletes from 19 countries by World Archery and Foundation for Global Sports Development to battle economic hardship due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Applications were received from 122 athletes in total and the field was cut to 40 and then finally 35. The original distribution was to be $150,000, but more was added with the large number of applicants. Grants were made from $1,500-7,500.

Of the 35 final recipients, ten were Americans:

Recurve (2): Khatuna Lorig, Jack Williams

Compound (8): Steve Anderson, Cassidy Cox, Linda Ochoa-Anderson, Tate Morgan, Paige Pearce, Alexis Ruiz, Matt Stutzman, Reo Wilde

It’s worth noting that many of the grantees are in Compound Archery, which is a non-Olympic division and whose athletes therefore get little or no support from National Olympic Committees, which concentrate on those in Recurve (Olympic) archery.

Athletics ● American sprinter Gabby Thomas was cleared of “whereabouts” failure on Saturday, just as she promised she would be.

Thomas was suspended on 2 May 2020 for missing three tests over a year’s period, but released a statement at the time that she would be cleared:

“Phone tracking data and multiple witnesses will conclusively show that I was at the exact location I established in my whereabouts and that the doping control officer simply failed to locate me and failed to follow proper protocol.

“Athletes are held to an incredibly high standard and the doping control organizations are supposed to be held to similarly high standards.”

Reuters reported that information Thomas provided in June showed that at least she was “not missing” for at least one of the tests.

A “whereabouts” failure penalty of two years could have been implemented; American sprinter Deajah Stevens was also suspended and her case is pending before the AIU Disciplinary Tribunal.

Former marathon world-record holder Wilson Kipsang of Kenya was suspended for four years from 10 January 2020 and had his results from 12 April 2019 annulled by the AIU Disciplinary Tribunal.

Kipsang, who ran 2:03:23 at the 2013 Berlin Marathon, was found to have missed three tests and had a “whereabouts” failure between 27 April 2018 and 17 May 2019. Further, Kipsang submitted false evidence of a traffic jam on 17 May 2019 that caused him to miss a test, but the incident, in fact, took place in August of that year.

Now 38, Kipsang’s last race was a 12th-place finish at the 2019 London Marathon (2:09:18, now expunged). He is eligible to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Badminton ● Two-time Olympic champion Dan Lin (CHN) announced his retirement last Saturday (4th), saying on social media:

“I’ve dedicated everything to the sport I love. My family, coaches, team mates and fans have accompanied me through many happy times and difficult moments.

“Now I’m 37 years old, and my physical fitness and pain no longer allow me to fight side by side with my team mates.”

Lin was one of the greatest players in history, winning the men’s Singles title at Beijing (2008) and London (2012), along with individual world titles in 2006-07-09-11-13 and runner-up silvers in 2007 and 2017.

He was 19th on the BWF World Rankings list when he retired and ended with a reported all-time record of 666-128 and 66 tournament wins.

China will miss him on the national team, but has 2016 Olympic champ Long Chen (currently ranked fourth) and Yu Qi Shi (9th) as its top men’s players at present.

Boxing ● What is going on with the AIBA?

Suspended until after the Tokyo Games in 2021, the federation has been struggling with overwhelming debt and the need for new leadership. Its planned election Congress continues to be postponed because of the coronavirus pandemic, but its future may be changing.

On the sidelines of the online convention of the World Boxing Association last week, a meeting was held between AIBA interim chief Mohamed Moustahsane (MAR) and WBA President Gilberto J. Mendoza, with a promise between the two for future collaboration.

Said Mendoza: “We are working on a formal agreement between the WBA and the AIBA to achieve a systematic development that includes both competition and ethics. We are on our way to join our criteria to work for only one boxing. We want to raise boxing to the high status it belongs. This way we can make our committee and team official. We will work together for the future. We will make a boxing rulebook that will be published in the future.”

Moustahsane added: “Since 2015, we have had many conversations and now it’s time to build something great for boxing. For me, and many others, athletes are the most important. I share this ideal of creating a relationship among us. Thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to talk. We must establish a fair and ethical relationship. The development must include medical features, referees, judges and proper official management of this sport. We must ensure that boxers are indeed the ones who benefit from this relationship.”

The WBA will celebrate its centennial next year and is the oldest of the myriad current professional boxing governance associations. If the WBA were to partner with AIBA, it could be the start of a path out of debt and toward renewed interest from the IOC.

But then, since when has professional boxing actually brought respectability to anything?

However, the WBA-AIBA discussions were welcome news, after another wild comment from Russian Boxing Federation Secretary General Umar Kremlev on 26 June. According to the Russian news service TASS:

“Secretary General of the Russian Boxing Federation (RBF) Umar Kremlevtold TASS earlier that his federation was ready to provide assistance to RusAF in the return of Russia’s track and field athletes on the international arena.”

Remember, Kremlev was the one who promised to pay AIBA’s entire debt and then circulated his name as a possible future president of the federation. But the Russian Athletics Federation missed the 1 July payment deadline for the fine imposed by World Athletics and might face expulsion later this year.

He may not be AIBA’s savior either.

Gymnastics ● The issues concerning which two U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee executives will be deposed in the continued USA Gymnastics bankruptcy case were settled last week, with former chief executive Scott Blackmun and long-time senior exec Rick Adams to be questioned.

The USOPC had objected to have either individual travel due to the continuing pandemic and both will now be questioned remotely, by video conference, during the week of 13 July. The USOPC’s Chief Financial Officer, Morane Kerek, will also be deposed.

Both sides in the case have been ordered to “submit a confidential and meaningful settlement offer” by early August, to be subject of mediation to begin in the middle of next month.

Doping Jorge Leyva (MEX), the chief executive of the Institute of National Anti-Doping Organizations (iNADO) issued a news release last Friday supporting the report of the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy to “to reaffirm its commitment to Good Governance practices and become a more independent organisation.”

In specific:

“For iNADO, the essence of the ONDCP report is the call for further improvements to WADA Governance. Two proposals of the document are essential to achieve this: more independent members in WADA governance and more participation of athletes in decision making processes.”

And

“Confidence in WADA´s ability to be a strong protector of the clean athlete has been severely affected in recent years and greater efforts need to be made to rebuild trust with the athlete community.”

Then, on Monday, came a clarification:

“As a follow-up to the press release issued on 3 July 2020, iNADO wants to clarify that the support to the ONDCP report is limited to the part suggesting more independence and athletes´ representation at the governing bodies of WADA.”

REAX: Not helpful; it would have been better not to mention the ONDCP report at all and focus on the proposals. And as far as confidence in finding cheats, how about more funding for WADA, now at a paltry $37.4 million annually, half of which is paid by the International Olympic Committee.

Sorry not to hear more from the national anti-doping organizations on how they’re working on that.

At the BuZZer ● As for WADA, its new president, former Polish 400 m runner Witola Banka told the Polish Press Agency:

“A few people know what motivates this report. Some time ago, the [U.S.] Congress decided that the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency’s (USADA’s) budget and the U.S. financial contribution to WADA were in one envelope. This therefore may indicate that this report is an attempt by USADA to raise more funds for its activities at the expense of WADA. We know that USADA was heavily consulted in the drafting of this report.”

And

“I don’t want to speculate on motives. However, I have the impression that USADA would like to take control of the global anti-doping system. This entire report is an attempt to undermine WADA as a global regulator for anti-doping by framing WADA as an organization that’s allegedly not up to the task.”

Banka, however, is optimistic, adding “We should look for the enemy somewhere else. In the fight against doping in sport, WADA needs the United States, and they need us. I am ready for good cooperation and I am convinced that it will happen sooner or later.”

He also has a sly sense of humor. He closed the interview noting:

“There is no room for politics in this business. It seems to be that, if two strong powers, like the U.S. and Russia, are criticizing us equally, then it may be the best evidence that WADA is an independent organization and can respond to that criticism.”

LANE ONE: Weltklasse Zurich tries for a technology gold medal with Lyles, Felix, Muhammad and more in “Inspiration Games” this Thursday

Weltklasse Zurich's "Inspiration Games" has competitors in seven venues at the same time on Thursday! (Photo: Weltklasse Zurich)

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

A single track meet, televised over 90 minutes, will take place this Thursday (9th) in seven different venues across nine time zones, with competitors simultaneously timed and the races shown as a “live” composite.

We’ve already had the “Impossible Games” in Oslo, Norway in June, highlighted by a world best in the 300 m hurdles by home hero Karsten Warholm. But now the folks who stage what is usually considered the best invitational meet in the world – Weltklasse Zurich, already canceled for 2020 – have come up with a wild scheme called the “Inspiration Games.”

If it works, it will be amazing. The concept, according to the three groups that are trying to make this happen:

Co-Meet Director Christoph Joho: “We would like to present a live event at Weltklasse Zürich level even this year. Therefore, we have been looking for creative ideas and working on new formats.”

SRG SSR (Swiss) television’s Roland Maegerle: “To synchronize up to three locations per discipline for the TV audience is a great technical challenge. We are delighted to be actively involved in this Swiss innovation project and to be able to offer athletics fans an exceptional sporting experience.”

Swiss Timing chief executive Alain Zobrist: “Swiss Timing will provide four stadiums with synchronized timing systems that will generate real-time data during the competitions and broadcast the results directly on TV. In particular, the latest transmission technologies will be used, which will be controlled centrally from Zurich. This is a great innovation for athletics and we are very happy to take on this technical challenge. We are looking forward to working with the teams of Weltklasse Zurich and Swiss Television in order to offer the athletes an opportunity to compete at an international level.”

The idea is to hold eight events – four each for men and women – with three competitors each. In the main, the events will be held at four sites:

Zurich (SUI): men’s 200 m ~ women’s 150 m ~ 300 m hurdles ~ 3×100 m
Walnut (USA): men’s triple jump ~ women’s 150 m ~ 300 m hurdles ~ pole vault
Papendal (NED): men’s 200 m ~ women’s 300 m hurdles ~ 3 x 100 m
Bradenton (USA): men’s 100 yards ~ triple jump ~ women’s 150 m ~ pole vault

There will also be individual competitors in France (two sites) and Sweden.

The event starts will be controlled by Swiss Timing from Zurich and with the delays in transmission to the various sites for races, the video and timing will be synched up by Swiss Television and shown as a simultaneous competition after a two-minute editing period. All three competitors will be shown on the screen at once. Standard timing and measuring rules will be in place at all sites.

Crazy? Yes. Fun? Yes. Watchable? We’ll see.

The 90-minute program will start at 8 p.m. Central European Time, which is 3 p.m. in Florida (at the IMG Academy in Bradenton) and noon in California (at the renovated Hilmer Lodge Stadium at Mt. San Antonio College in Walnut). The meet is expected to be televised in the U.S., but no details are available yet.

The entries are intriguing, not so much for who will win, but to see what kind of shape these folks are in:

● In Bradenton, all three entries can run the men’s 100 yards together: Andre De Grasse (CAN), Jimmy Vicaut (FRA) and Omar McLeod (JAM). Noah Lyles – who ran a wind-aided 9.93 in the 100 m Saturday at Montverde, Florida – will run the 200 m, Sam Kendricks will compete in the vault and Christian Taylor will triple jump. Shaunae Miller-Uibo (BAH), who opened in Monteverde with wins in 22.61 (200 m) and 50.52 (400 m), will try the 150 m, and Sandi Morris of the U.S. will compete in the vault.

● In Walnut, Allyson Felix will run the 150 m and Dalilah Muhammad will contest the 300 m hurdles, with the world-best of 38.16 by Zuzana Hejnova (CZE) from 2013 clearly in play. Greece’s Katerina Stefanidi – who vaulted at Stanford – will also compete here, along with Omar Craddock in the men’s triple jump.

● In Papendal, Hejnova will contest the 300 m hurdles and Churandy Martina (NED) will try the men’s 200 m.

● In Zurich, Swiss stars Mujinga Kambundji and Lea Sprunger will compete at 150 m and in the 300 m hurdles, respectively, and Christophe Lemaitre (FRA) will run in the men’s 200 m.

(You can forget about a world best in the women’s 150 m: it’s 16.10 by Florence Griffith-Joyner [USA] in route to her 21.34 world record in the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul!)

Polish vault star Piotr Lisek and Swede Angelica Bengtsson will be vaulting in Karlstad (SWE) and 2012 Olympic vault champ Renaud Lavillenie (FRA) will be competing in Aubriere (FRA).

Although this is formally an exhibition, in standard Weltklasse style, there is prize money: $10,000 for the winners, $6,000 for second and $4,000 for third. There will, however, be few or no spectators at any of the sites, owing to the coronavirus mass gathering restrictions in all three locations.

The field events will start prior to the television window, with the running events starting with the women’s 150 m, then the men’s 100 yards, women’s 300 m hurdles, men’s 200 m and the traditional relay finish of the women’s 3×100 m.

The Wanda Diamond League season – as currently envisioned – is supposed to start on 14 August in Monaco and continue for eight more meets through 17 October. Absolutely no one knows if any of these meets will be held.

But the Zurich folks have shown great creative and technical flair, only available with today’s worldwide communications infrastructure, to put together something challenging, interesting and potentially fun. Good for them, and for track fans everywhere.

Worth reporting from Saturday was a world-leading 5.94 m (19-6) in the men’s vault from Mondo Dupantis (SWE) in Gothenburg and some excellent marks in Montverde, Florida.

In addition to wins for Miller-Uibo, Lyles won his 100 m heat in 9.93w (+4.0 m/s), in front of Justin Gatlin (9.99w) and long-injured Trayvon Bromell showed promise with a 10.04 win in heat five, his best since 2016. Kenny Bednarek won both sprint finals in 10.14 and 20.06, proving he has returned from injury as well. Christian Taylor won the triple jump at 16.75 m (54-11 1/2).

Sha’Carri Richardson won the women’s 100 m, clocking 10.94w (+2.8 m/s) in her heat and 11.05 in the final. Her heat time was her third-fastest ever (all conditions) and the 11.05 final is her fourth-fastest legal time; not bad for her first races in 344 days!

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: No money, no Russians in international T&F; Gwen Berry spurns grant; FIFA to distribute $1.5 billion to member feds!

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Athletics ● As expected, World Athletics did not receive the $5 million fine amount from the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) by the 1 July deadline. So the announcement was made:

“World Athletics will stand down both the Doping Review Board (DRB) and the Russian Taskforce until World Athletics’ Council has reviewed and discussed the situation at their meeting on 29-30 July.”

This means that no Russian athletes will be eligible to compete as neutral athletes in any international competitions and that any “roadmap” toward reinstatement of the Russian federation is also at a standstill.

World Athletics noted that the total amount due at present is the $5 million fine, but also $1.31 million in costs from 30 June 2019 to 31 March 2020 relating to the Doping Review Board, Russian Taskforce and legal costs, including those for the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

The question of Russian participation in any sport at Tokyo will be heard at the Court of Arbitration for Sport from 2-5 November, in the case of the World Anti-Doping Agency vs. the Russian Anti-Doping Agency. WADA has instituted a four-year sanction against Russia, which would cover not only Olympic Games, but all major international games and world championships.

“I know for sure that I wasn’t chosen [for a grant] because of my stance on the podium. Because I was told that.”

That’s 2019 Pan American Games women’s hammer champ Gwen Berry, speaking to Yahoo! Sports on Wednesday, about being left off a list of 100 athletes who were selected for grants from the USA Track & Field Foundation. A total of $875,000 in grants by Stephen A. Schwarzman was detailed on Tuesday, with 25 athletes receiving $20,000 each and 75 more receiving $5,000 each.

On Wednesday, the USATF Foundation itself announced a further set of 39 grants of $5,000 each, which did not include Berry, but with a notation at the end of the list:

“Gwen Berry (Hammer Throw) was awarded a 2020 Elite Athlete Grant in the amount of $5,000, but requested to be taken off the grant award list.”

The Foundation issued a further statement that included:

“The USATF Foundation has supported Gwen Berry since 2012 with $91,000 in grant support, including 2 grants totaling $5,500 in 2019 – after her protest at the Pan Am Games. Additionally, Gwen was originally included in our press release today to receive another $5,000 grant — a decision that was made a week ago. We contacted Gwen yesterday to inform her of the award but she declined to accept it. We will however hold the grant for her through the rest of the year should she change her mind.

“While we understand Gwen’s disappointment with not receiving our largest grant award this year, there are only 25 of them for over 40 events. In a perfect world, the Foundation would give all of our grantees more money but the demand exceeds the need at this point as we have over 250 applicants. Gwen’s allegation that her stance on the podium at the Pan Am Games adversely affected our grant-making decisions in 2020 is inaccurate.”

Said Berry in the Yahoo! Sports story: “A USATF Foundation official, she says, called her a couple days [after the Pan Am Games], ‘and told me I better not do it again, or else I’ll lose funding.’”

Which makes the Foundation’s comments and Berry’s comments in direct contradiction. Berry said in two tweets about the grant:

“It’s not about aggregate levels of support or the time. Its about hypocrisy. Corporations and the IOC need to stop saying they support civil rights yet punishing the human right to peaceful protest.”

And

“I stand by what I said. The need hasn’t changed, my performance has never been higher! They can keep the money.”

Analysis: Looking at the Schwarzman grants of $20,000 to 25 athletes, there is a pattern which emerges in 23 of them: placement in the final of the World Championships in Doha. Only Daniel Roberts (110 m hurdles) and Omar Craddock (men’s triple jump) did not make the Worlds final in their events; Roberts was national champion in the hurdles, but was disqualified in his semifinal. Craddock, third at the nationals, missed qualifying for his final by virtue of his second-best jump after tying for the 12th and last spot.

Berry, a medal favorite in Doha, was second at the U.S. nationals and qualified 10th for the Worlds hammer final, but then had three fouls and did not earn a placement.

While the basis for the $20,000 grants was not disclosed, based on the USATF and Doha results, Berry certainly has a point vis-a-vis the grant to Craddock, but not so much on the other 24.

Alpine Skiing ● After a request from the Italian Winter Sports Federation (FISI) to delay the scheduled 2021 FIS Alpine World Championships to 2022, the decision was made to keep the event in Cortina d’Ampezzo on the original schedule in 2021.

According to FISI chief Flavio Roda: “It was clear after speaking to [stakeholders] in the last weeks, there was a strong desire to carry out the event in 2021 and to put all resources available to ensure that the World Championships are carried out at the highest level. Based on this feedback and the clear commitment of all parties, FISI expressed to the FIS Council the importance of these World Championships to be staged in 2021 as a positive signal for the entire country of Italy.”

Cycling ● Looking for any way to try to obtain government clearance to hold the famed Giro d’Italia from 5-29 October – instead of its normal May slot – the organizers are working on a wild way to keep people from getting too close to each other.

Race director Mauro Vegni told a local television station in Italy (as reported by Cycling News):

“We’re working on a protocol. It’ll be divided into different areas, which we will manage and then out on the road. We can’t control the roads; we have to put our trust in people’s good behaviour. At finishes we’ll probably give the public a wristband that lets out a noise when people don’t respect social distancing, registering who they come into contact with. There will be serious investments to ensure distancing.

“It’s difficult there’ll be a publicity caravan but we can only hope the data improves and things change. We’re concerned about the idea because it can spark crowds. We’re studying things with the sponsors to understand what to do.”

It’s an interesting idea and if even somewhat successful, could see wider implementation at other events of all kinds.

Football ● FIFA is putting its money where its mouth is, promising $1.5 billion in support for national football federations hit by the coronavirus impact.

Each national federation will receive $3.5 million in grants: $3 million for general use and $500,000 specifically to support women’s football. In addition, loans of up to 35% of annual revenues will be available from $500,000-5 million.

Of course, there are regulations: “[T]o ensure effective oversight of the plan, there will be strict controls on the use of funds, audit requirements, as well as clear loan repayment conditions. A FIFA COVID-19 Relief Plan steering committee will also be established to supervise the administration of the scheme.”

Still, however, this is quite impressive, and unparalleled among the international federations, of which FIFA is by far the richest.

Ice Hockey ● There are indications that National Hockey League players may be able to participate in the 2022 Olympic Winter Games in Beijing (CHN) and the 2026 Winter Games in Milan and Cortina d’Ampezzo (ITA).

SportsNet Canada reported on Tuesday that negotiations for the NHL’s next collective bargaining agreement will include the 2022 Beijing Games, if the financial terms on travel, housing, insurance and the like can be worked out with the International Olympic Committee.

The NHL skipped the 2018 Winter Games in PyeongChang (KOR), hardly a major growth market for the sport. But China is important, as is Europe, so the interests of the owners are better aligned with those of players who wish to be part of their national teams.

But nothing is set, yet.

Youth Olympic Games ● The final report from the 2020 Winter Youth Olympic Games held in Lausanne, Switzerland was posted and showed a CHF 400,000 surplus from its budget of CHF 48.0 million (1 CHF = $1.06).

The International Olympic Committee’s Web story on the results could barely contain its enthusiasm, but while the event went well and received high praise for the competition conditions, efficient organization and use of existing facilities, there was also this:

“The cash income [of CHF 37.7 million] was made up of public funds from the City of Lausanne and the Canton of Vaud (CHF 9 million each), the [Swiss] Confederation (CHF 8 million) These revenues were supplemented by Swiss Olympic (CHF 1.4 million), ticketing and merchandising (CHF 2.2 million) and cash sponsorship partnerships (CHF 1.9 million).

“The International Olympic Committee (IOC) for its part contributed CHF 6.2 million to the operating budget of the Organising Committee, thus contributing to the success of Lausanne 2020 for a total of CHF 29 million.”

There was also CHF 10.8 million of in-kind services donated to the event.

So, in total, the local, regional and national governments provided 69.0% of the funding of the event, with the IOC and the Swiss Olympic Committee adding another 20.2%. Funding generated from the event itself contributed just 10.8% of the revenue total.

That is still a bad equation in terms of moving toward self-supporting events, which is the new model for the Olympic and Olympic Winter Games. Time will tell if the governmental expenditures succeed in convincing potential conference and sports organizers that Lausanne should be a future venue of choice.

At the BuZZer ● Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo won a second term in elections held on 28 June, winning 48.7% of the vote to easily defeat her rivals.

Hidalgo, a Socialist, won a six-year term that will see her through the 2024 Olympic Games to be held in Paris. Thanks to the coronavirus impact, only about 41% of Paris voters actually cast a ballot.

LANE ONE: Russian athletics misses fine deadline and WADA slaps back hard at U.S. Office of National Drug Policy report

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

While the world suffers with the continued impact of COVID-19, the tug-of-war over doping – especially Russian doping – has hardly missed a beat. In Moscow, at the World Athletics office in Monaco and at the World Anti-Doping Agency headquarters in Montreal, it’s already a hot summer.

● The Russia Athletics Federation (RusAF) was due to pay a $5 million fine to World Athletics today (1 July) in order to allow some of its athletes to be able to compete as neutrals, but has asked for an indefinite delay.

The Russian news service TASS reported RusAF chief Yevgeny Yurchenko’s comments:

“Our appeals, which were sent to World Athletics, remained unanswered unfortunately.

“This is why we are addressing our appeal today not only to the chief of World Athletics, Sebastian Coe, but to the World Athletics Council as well, in our open letter on behalf of all RusAF presidium members.”

The sports.ru site reported the Russian Sports Minister, Oleg Matytsin, also chimed in:

“The issue is very important for the ministry, and for the entire sports community, the athletics community, and the world community. Unfortunately, the VFLA [RusAF] found itself in a very difficult situation – the current leadership bears the burden of responsibility for previous wrong steps taken by the leadership. …

“To date, the penalty has not been paid, we sent a letter on behalf of the Russian Ministry of Sports to the World Athletics [chief] Sebastian Coe, to the IOC [chief] Thomas Bach so that our athletes would not suffer in any way, so that they would not bind the sanctions imposed on the federation in any way, with sanctions on the activities of athletes – they have already actually suffered, as they have the status of neutral.

“I hope that at least this voice will be heard. As far as I know, the VFLA leadership also sent a letter requesting a deferment of this payment, explaining the very difficult economic situation around the world. I hope that the leadership of World Athletics will take this into account, especially since they themselves are in a very difficult economic situation, like the whole world community.

“It seems to me that we need to demonstrate solidarity and allow the federation to develop. Because all that VFLA does today is the fight for pure sport, a very active fight with the use of doping, educational programs, the ability to provide the training process, participation in competitions.”

There is no chance that World Athletics will do anything other than it has already done: ban Russian athletes from competing. The federation’s lengthy suspension of RusAF dates back to 2015 and each time there appears to be some movement forward, something new happens. The latest was a complete falsification – now admitted – of documents to cover up “whereabouts” failures of 2018 World Indoor High Jump Champion Danil Lysenko, in late 2018.

The World Athletics Russia Task Force report from March of this year noted “this is another gross betrayal of trust that compounds the harm done by the previous regime” and concluded that if there are any further such shenanigans, “Council is very likely to propose to member federations that RusAF be permanently expelled from membership of World Athletics.”

● While Russia is trying to get its track & field athletes eligible, the World Anti-Doping Agency hit back at the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy for its 19-page report submitted on 17 June, slamming WADA as ineffective in not being tough enough on Russia and paying more attention to the U.S.

The reply looks very much like an exam paper returned with the teacher’s red markings all through it, and took a 19-page report into a 46-page lecture on WADA’s history and actual procedures.

But having the whole document and the WADA reply allows the quarrel to be summarized on a few points:

The U.S. “complaints” are essentially that WADA was not tough enough on Russia, that the U.S. doesn’t have enough power or representation for its $2.71 million in dues for 2020 and that sports organizations have too much power and representation.

It’s worth noting that the annual WADA budget right now is a paltry $37.4 million, of which the International Olympic Committee pays half (50%). The laughable aspect of the U.S. report is that it demands:

“WADA’s governance must be free from undue influence by sports organizations with a direct financial interest in WADA decisions”

and in the next paragraph, requires:

“Representation on the WADA [Foundation Board] and WADA [Executive Committee] should be proportionate to financial contributions, and likewise a proportionate number of WADA standing committee members should be from the United States.”

Really?

The WADA reply highlights some bad facts for the U.S. report, most notably that Canada is the largest national government contributor to WADA in 2019 at $2.86 million when counting all contributions, with the U.S. second at $2.61 million.

Further, the formula for contributions was decided according to a formula agreed to by the U.S. and other 43 other governments in the Americas region, back in 2008. According to the agreement, “the U.S. ‘agrees and commits to paying 50% of the America’s region’s 29% of WADA dues.’” Oops.

The WADA reply also noted that the U.S. has 11 individuals in place on the agency’s Board and committees, more than any other country. What’s more, as to the lack of an American on the current WADA Executive Committee:

“[I]n February 2020, nations of the Americas met in Ecuador for their annual inter-governmental meeting to discuss mutual anti-doping interests; including, the important topic of representation on WADA’s Board and ExCo for the 2-year period following the meeting. To our knowledge, the U.S. government did not attend that meeting to seek a seat on the WADA ExCo”

and

“Unlike previous years, for 2020, the U.S. government did not submit any nominations for U.S. members or Chairs to any Standing Committees, including the Athlete Committee.”

Oh, boy.

The reply also emphasized that if governance positions were based on contributions, “it would eliminate the potential of the majority of nations from ever holding a seat on the WADA ExCo or Board.”

WADA President Witold Banka (POL), himself a former international-class 400 m runner, pummeled U.S. ONDCP Director James Carroll in a cover letter:

“It is therefore with great disappointment that I read the ONDCP Report of 17 June to the U.S. Congress, regarding WADA Reform Efforts. Given that, during our 12 June telephone meeting, we discussed a renewed spirit of cooperation, I would have expected your office to have consulted us on the Report; or, at the very least, to have verified the factual veracity of the allegations being made against WADA. Instead, in the days before publication, you informed us of the impending Report and asked us to verify three paragraphs by a certain deadline; and, when we did so in good faith, you chose not to incorporate our clarifications. As the saying goes, ‘why let the truth get in the way of a good story’?”

And then came a final blow:

“One obvious way for the U.S. government to contribute more to the fight against doping in sport may well lie in increased efforts to protect young Americans that practice sport in an environment where the rules fall short of those established by WADA” which would include most college and professional sports in the U.S.

The only area on which both agree is that athlete representation must be increased and, in fact, WADA has asked its Athletes Committee to come up with the right formula.

Where these two organizations should be cooperating, they are now feuding. As U.S. Anti-Doping Agency head Travis Tygart praised the U.S. ONDCP report, one wonders who is driving the agenda here … and why?

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

LANE ONE: Only half-baked: U.S. athlete statement demands that they must be heard, then asks to form a committee

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

The breathless announcement on Twitter came at 9:12 a.m. Pacific time on Saturday (27th), stating

“The USOPC AAC and John Carlos call on the IOC and the IPC to abolish IOC Charter Rule 50″

Simple, direct and expected, but unfortunately it didn’t stop there. And to the disappointment of anyone who actually hoped for a bold, insightful vision of the future, it continued

“and develop a new policy in direct collaboration with athlete representatives.”

What a letdown.

And that’s before reading the image of a five-paragraph letter signed by six members of the U.S.. Olympic & Paralympic Committee’s Athletes Advisory Council, plus 1968 Olympic 200 m bronze medalist Carlos, who famously protested with a raised left fist during his victory ceremony. The letter included, in pertinent part:

“Athletes will no longer be silenced.

“We are now at a crossroads. The [International Olympic Committee] and [International Paralympic Committee] cannot continue on the path of punishing or removing athletes who speaks up for what they believe in, especially when those beliefs exemplify the goals of Olympism. Instead, sports administrators must begin the responsible task of transparent collaboration with athletes and athlete groups (including independent athlete groups) to reshape the future of athlete expression at the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Let us work together to create a new structure that celebrates athletes who speak about issues in alignment with human rights and the 7 principles of Olympism.”

Let’s form a committee.

To the credit of the letter’s authors, they recognize the enormous danger of the absence of restraints on protests at the Games and that their “fight for freedom” could, in fact, degrade or even kill the Games as an interest point for the worldwide public. Both the raised fist and the Nazi salute can be considered as “speech,” so where is the line?

Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter eliminates the weighing issue by flatly stating, “No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas.”

None means none, and so Carlos and co-protester Tommie Smith were kicked off the team by the U.S. Olympic Committee (as it was known in those days) shortly after their protest, as were Americans Vince Matthews and Wayne Collett after their 1972 protest on the victory stand after the 1972 Olympic 400 m final.

So now, if we take the athlete letter at its word, some forms of protest must be acceptable, but some must not.

This is news?

Isn’t this exactly what USOPC chief executive Sarah Hirshland started on 8 June:

“Today, I am creating an athlete-led group to challenge the rules and systems in our own organization that create barriers to progress, including your right to protest.”

She said during a post-Board meeting teleconference on 18 June that “We’ve had about 30 athletes so far come forward and volunteer to be an active part of our process. We are working on a working group that will likely have several sub areas focused on education and training, focused on diversity and inclusion in our organization and our community.”

And didn’t the the IOC Executive Board do the same in asking its Athletes’ Commission to consider back on 10 June:

“The IOC Executive Board supports the initiative of the IOC Athletes’ Commission to explore different ways of how Olympic athletes can express their support for the principles enshrined in the Olympic Charter, including at the time of the Olympic Games, and respecting the Olympic spirit.”

Where is the clear, direct statement that should replace Rule 50?

Nowhere.

And if the “discussion” – whatever it ends up being – is going to truly “solve” the athlete’s “voice” issues, then it also has to include the IOC’s Rule 40/Bylaw 3 requirements on commercialization of an athlete’s performance. The current rule reads:

“Competitors, team officials and other team personnel who participate in the Olympic Games may allow their person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games in accordance with the principles determined by the IOC Executive Board.”

The IOC has told athletes to work this out with their own National Olympic Committees, but if we are talking about athlete’s “voice” and athlete “rights,” then how far are we from seeing these “demonstrations” on the awards podium:

● An athlete receiving a medal, then unfolding and wearing a bib showing the Stars and Bars of the old Confederacy?

● A “protest” concerning any of the many worldwide conflicts or even personal messages? This list could be infinite, but let’s start with “Free Tibet,” “Free Hong Kong,” “Death to Israel,” the separatist movement in Spain and many, many more.

● And if we are talking about athlete rights and speech, what about athletes showing commercial messages on bibs placed on top of their clothing? How about the visual equivalent of “I’m going to Disney World!” or perhaps specific brand ads, even for disfavored categories such as distilled spirits, like Havana Club rum (the Cuban version or that made in Puerto Rico?), or tobacco products like famed Montecristo cigars (Cuban or Dominican or Nicaraguan)?

How will these be prevented? Who will “screen” athletes to ensure that they make an “appropriate” protest or demonstration prior to the beginning of a ceremony? Is this up to the IOC Athletes’ Commission? A member of the NOC of the athlete to be awarded?

And when (not if) these kinds of “repugnant” demonstrations take place in ceremonies, awards presentations or are cleverly included in competition uniforms, what sanctions – if any – are to be handed out?

Who makes those decisions? How quickly? If a swimmer “demonstrates” or “protests” on the first night of competition, with four or five more events to come, when does the decision come down relative to their other events … which may start the next day?

The IOC’s Executive Board is right that this is an athlete’s issue, with proposals to be worked out among current and former athletes, preferably with some consensus, and then advanced to the IOC and IPC for their review, discussion and acceptance and/or revision.

How long is this going to take?

As Hirshland stated in the 18 June teleconference, “we have not done that work yet” and the athlete’s letter from Saturday does not advance anything.

I understand from personal experience this kind of process. In 1980, with the Olympic boycott by the U.S., The Athletics Congress sent the track & field section of the American “Olympic Team” on two European tours, the first before the Moscow Games and the second after the Games had finished. During one of the first nights of the first stop of the first tour in Stuttgart, Germany, the two team press officers – the late Bruce Tenen and myself – were requested to meet with an athlete group that included the late Dick Buerkle, Olympic 800 m gold medalist Madeline Manning Mims and others, to draft a statement concerning the boycott and the athlete view of it.

We produced a draft within a day and the athlete leadership group made revisions and then took it with them to present to the USOC prior to the White House ceremony for the 1980 team. That draft was the core of the statement finally issued by the athletes later in the summer.

Hasn’t anyone done the same for a new set of IOC rules already? Where’s the draft?

Tokyo is 421 days away. And no committee meetings have yet been scheduled.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: Australia-New Zealand gets ‘23 FIFA Women’s World Cup, White House report flames WADA, 50% doping in swimming?

The late Mort Tenner (center) during his stint as Competition Director for the track & field events at the 1984 Olympic Games (Photo: Tenner family)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

Vox Populi ● Further to our 18 June story on Olympic protests and medal ceremonies, this note on a famed gold medalist from British statistician Stan Greenberg:

“I knew Harold Abrahams (1924 100 m gold medallist) quite well and visited his house once. As I entered his study I looked eagerly around and said ‘where is it?’ He said ‘what?’ I said your medal – expecting it to be on a wall with a searchlight or something shining on it. On his desk he had a glass dish (as most of us have) which had all sorts of junk in it, like paperclips, pins, bits of paper and dust. He dug around in it and came up with a tarnished dirty medal. I was shocked and said ‘you can’t do that.’ To which he pointed out that he had received it in 1924, a few weeks later in the mail, and that that there had been no ‘razamatazz’ as there is now, and that it didn’t actually mean all that much to him – although of course the actual title did.”

Further to David Miller’s “Olympic Ethic Outweighs Protest,” Fordham University Gabelli School of Business Associate Professor Mark Conrad writes:

“I just read Mr. Miller’s comments regarding protest at the Olympics. While he does make some fair points about the effects of repealing Rule 50 and a possible opening of the Pandora’s box of protest, I think that his condescending tone was disrespectful to Ms. [Gwen] Berry and the opinions she feels (which are now felt by millions of Americans, black and white). Also, his extolling the virtues of the IOC should be refuted.

“First, let’s call the IOC for what it is: a large entertainment company that puts on a world event where the athletes are the labor force for their multi-billion dollar TV deals. Let us also admit that the IOC does not render its decisions in utmost morality. It has permitted such human rights bastions as China (2008 and 2022) and Russia (2014) as hosts of the Olympics. It may prefer totalitarian states because there is no threat of public protest to the exorbitant costs of the games and the ways the IOC limits its losses.

“Now to the issue of Rule 50 and Ms. Berry. To characterize her situation as being ‘a fortunate woman, living in a country, whatever its injustices, which has the financial means and momentum to provide facilities for Berry’s esoteric activity, which cannot be considered likely to promote social egalitarianism for Afro-Americans but allows Berry a full sense of acceptance as Pan American champion,’ as offensive and a travesty. First, does he know that USATF is not exactly pouring the dollars of support for its athletes, while its CEO rakes in millions of dollars per year? In fact, many T and F athletes complain about a lack of adequate support (especially ones that don’t get the endorsement bucks). Second, and more to the point, Ms. Berry did not [raise a fist] because of herself. She was expressing her outrageous at a legacy of racism for 400 years and second-class citizenship that lasted (at least in theory) until the 1960s and still is present today. There are risks taking that kind of action in the court of public opinion. Suffice it to say that any athlete will engage in this protest at the next Olympics (whenever that would be) would be risking negative reaction by millions of people. Ask John Carlos and Tommie Smith. Mr. Miller seems to be inferring his views are really a griping session. If you watch the video of the recent murder of George Floyd, it was hardly a gripe.

“It’s not that I totally disagree with the main point Mr. Miller makes: there is a Pandora’s box potential in eliminating Rule 50 (although imagine the TV ratings would go up if millions would be glued to their TVs or laptops to see if athlete X takes a knee or not — NBC could make even more money!). It is his seeming trivialization of Ms. Berry’s point of view that should be called out.”

More comments? Contact us here.

Doping“American taxpayers should receive a tangible return on their investment in WADA in the form of clean sport, fair play, effective administration of the world anti-doping system and a proportionate voice in WADA decision-making.”

That’s from a report of the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy, which compiled a report deeply critical of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Reuters reported that it had reviewed the report, which “concluded that the US was underrepresented on WADA’s key policy-making committees, that WADA has not moved urgently enough to reform itself in the wake of the Russian doping scandal and that Congress should consider giving the office discretion to withhold future funding.”

The U.S. is reported to provide $2.7 million in annual funding for WADA, which would be about 5.4% of its $37.4 million budget, but 14.4% of its budget not provided by the International Olympic Committee (which funds 50% of WADA’s budget).

Travis Tygart, the head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and a WADA critic, told Reuters that the failures to detect the massive Russian doping scandal from 2011-15 and the new revelations of widespread doping cover-ups in weightlifting, are deeply troubling. According to Reuters:

“‘Russia is the prime example and we have another one that just hit us….which is the weightlifting federation,’ Tygart said. ‘Its president not only misappropriated $10.5 million but also covered up over 40 doping cases that robbed clean athletes around the world.

“‘And what happens when he gets caught? He simply retires. He’s probably on some beach sipping cocktails right now,’ he added.”

WADA hit back, stating “It is very unfortunate that the report was written without due regard for the facts or context and with the clear intention to discredit WADA.”

While WADA was being criticized, three Russian athletes are seeking assistance from Russian President Vladimir Putin to rescue their participation in international sport. Current and former world champions Maria Lasitskene (high jump), Sergey Shubenkov (110 m hurdles) and Anzhelika Sidorova (pole vault) co-signed an open letter which included:

“Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, Russian athletics has been in crisis since 2015. During that period a great number of officials, including the head of Russian Olympic Committee (ROC), Sports Minster and chief of Russian Athletics Federation (RUSAF) have been replaced. We have constantly heard statements that everything possible has been done to protect Russian athletes.

“And now, five years later our athletes and coaches are not even allowed to show their potential, as they are prohibited from performing internationally even in neutral status. Starting from July 1 our national federation could be completely expelled from World Athletics if the fee imposed by the governing body is not paid.

“Last year, you tasked the ROC with working out necessary measures to restore the international membership of RUSAF, making it clear that you worry about the fate of Russian track and field and athletes.

“One year has passed since then, but the situation has only deteriorated. We still don’t see any plan to solve the crisis and have no choice but to address you personally.

“We want to direct your attention to the catastrophic state of things in Russian athletics. We are on the verge of disaster. We hope for your support and understanding.”

World Athletics has imposed a $10 million fine on the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF), with $5 million due by 1 July. If not paid, Russian athletes will not be allowed to compete internationally, even as neutrals.

Athletics ● Great sadness with the death of a former world-record holder and a key member of the 1984 Olympic frack & field competition staff.

Dick Buerkle, who stunned the T&F world with a world indoor record in the mile in 1978 (3:54.93), passed away on Monday (22 June) at the age of 72 from complications related to Parkinson’s Disease.

He was an unmistakable presence on the track with his bald head – since age 12 due to disease – and steady gait, and achieved stunning success, especially for someone who didn’t really take up the sport until his senior year in high school and then walked-on at Villanova,

He was a three-time All-American for Jumbo Elliott at Villanova in 1969 and 1970 and was the U.S. champion at 5,000 m in 1974 and 1978. He was a 1976 Olympian in the 5,000 m and made the 1980 U.S. team as well.

But he was perhaps most famous for two races: (1) beating Steve Prefontaine in the two-mile at the 1974 CYO Invitational in College Park, Maryland, Pre’s first loss to an American since 1970, and (2) his world mark in the mile – at the same site – four years later, running hard from the gun and winning in 3:54.93 to better Tony Waldrop’s mark of 3:55.0 from 1974.

He retired in 1981 and became a teacher and track coach in the Atlanta area. He is survived by his wife Jean, son Gabe and daughters Lily and Tera.

Long-time referee and rules expert Mort Tenner, the Track & Field Competition Director for the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, passed away at age 92 on 22 June (Monday).

Tenner (pictured above) was an Angeleno through and through, attending Los Angeles High School and then graduating from UCLA with Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Education and later earning his Ph.D. after returning from Army service in the Korean War.

He became a noted teacher, first at South Gate High School in the Los Angeles Unified School District, eventually advancing to becoming the much-respected Principal at Franklin High School in Los Angeles from 1967-84.

While at Franklin, he continued the work of predecessors in raising college scholarship funds for students, later helping to establish today’s Franklin High Educational Foundation in 1993. He continued his work in education with the LAUSD administration, finally retiring in 1990.

He had another life altogether in track & field. He was a long-time official and became the go-to person for rules interpretation, serving as the top meet referee in the Southern California area for decades. Calm, decisive, clear-thinking and never one to suffer fools – qualities no doubt honed in his years working with high school students – Tenner was the choice of Athletics Commissioner H.D. Thoreau for the post of Competition Director for the 1984 track & field events in the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. That was a facility Tenner knew well from decades of meets there, including the famed Coliseum Relays of the 1940-50-60s, and the Olympic meet was a tremendous success.

Tenner was a fixture at track meets in the area and was a sought-after meet referee into the 2000s. He had a quick wit, especially adept at deflating protests from coaches who claimed the rules said one thing when they actually said something else.

He is survived by his wife Mary and daughters Laura, Suzanne and Nancy and son Paul, and three grandchildren. No funeral is planned; contributions may be made to the Franklin High Educational Foundation.

To the surprise of very few, both the 27 September Berlin Marathon and the 1 November New York City Marathon have been canceled.

On Facebook, the Berlin Marathon posted “As hard as we have tried, it is currently not possible to organize the 2020 BMW BERLIN-MARATHON.”

On its Web site, the New York Road Runners announced “The 2020 TCS New York City Marathon, set to take place on November 1, has been canceled. New York Road Runners (NYRR), the event organizer, in partnership with the Mayor’s Office of the City of New York, have made the decision to cancel the world’s largest marathon due to coronavirus-related health and safety concerns for runners, spectators, volunteers, staff, and the many partners and communities that support the event.”

These will not be the last events to be skipped for 2020.

Football ● As expected, the Australia-New Zealand bid was selected for the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup. The final vote was 22-13 over Colombia, after the Japanese bid had been withdrawn earlier in the week.

Following up on the success of the 2019 tournament in France, the next edition will be expanded to 32 teams, the same as presently held for the men’s World Cup. The bid book for the Australia-New Zealand bid projects sites in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Newcastle and Launceston in Australia and Auckland, Wellington, Hamilton, Christchurch and Dunedin in New Zealand.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Gary Klausner denied a motion by the U.S. Women’s National Team for a final verdict on the counts he had dismissed via summary judgement on 1 May, first requiring a jury trial in mid-September on the remaining, smaller issues.

“The granting of an immediate appeal will not eliminate the possibility of two trials or the possibility of successive appeals involving interlocking facts. The court has declined the parties’ request to stay trial pending the resolution of any appeal. And should a jury render a verdict unfavorable to plaintiffs on their remaining claims, there is no reason to think plaintiffs will not appeal that decision.”

The Women’s National Team plaintiffs indicated they will continue to pursue their case.

Gymnastics ● A report filed last Monday (22 June) documented that legal expenses for the USA Gymnastics bankruptcy case (including the Larry Nassar-related abuse claims) have passed the $10 million mark.

The report of operations covering the month of April 2020 showed that total legal fees and direct expenses claimed in the case by all sides at $10,605,188. Of this amount, some $6.26 million has actually been paid and $4.35 million remains.

The busiest firm has been USA Gymnastics’s primary counsel, Jenner & Block of Chicago, which has billed $4.42 million so far. The primary firm for the Survivors Committee, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl & Jones of Los Angeles, have billed $2.40 million through the end of April.

Swimming ● Rio Olympic 100 m Freestyle champ Kyle Chalmers chatted with Australian Rules Football star Phil Davis for a lengthy podcast posted on Wednesday (24 June), in which the swimmer shared his awe of NBA players in the Olympic Village in Rio, how he had to make a hard choice between Australian Rules Football and swimming, and doping.

On doping, he shared:

“There’s a lot of doping that goes on everywhere in swimming. You know it’s going on, and I know that I can probably not trust half of the guys I’m competing against.

“I know we as an Australian swim team are so obviously against it because like, look at Shayna Jack, the Australian swimmer who failed a drug test this year and she got a four-year ban just because we hate drug cheats in Australia.”

“So for me, [teammate] Mack [Horton] standing up against [China freestyle star] Sun Yang [on the 2019 World Champs podium] and making a big announcement about it was inspiring, and I supported Mack from afar. Like, I wasn’t going to go into the media and stand up against it, it’s a big thing to do. It takes a lot of courage and it was a very scary time for Mack, especially after he did it, with the threats and whatnot.

“And now it’s completely turned the other way, the Chinese are all supporting Mack and have hating on Sun Yang for being a liar and lying to them. So it’s been an interesting roller coaster, that journey.

“But for me, I want to beat anyone on any given day. Like, I don’t care what my competitors have in their system, I want to still be better than them, and I don’t want to have to think about those things while I’m racing. It’s about what I can do and what’s in my control, and making sure that I’m the best.

“You do want to make sure you have that even playing field really, and it is sad that there is questions over athletes in the sport, but I think Mack making that stand and making such a big deal out of it has created change in the sport and helped people realize that it is going on and it’s real and like, those countries are so far ahead of our drug-testing pool so they’re not going to find out for years what’s actually in their systems, which is really sad.”

Replied Davis, “They always say that the users are further in front of the people who are trying to catch them.”

Yikes.

Games of the XXXV Olympiad ● The latest from the Australia 2032 campaign came from IOC member and Australian Olympic Committee chief John Coates.

Speaking at the launch event for the Parliamentary Friends of the Olympic Movement, Coates told guests that “There is already a need for jobs and growth in the Queensland economy arising from the impact of COVID-19.

“Our partner three levels of government recognize a potential 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games as a critical part of the state and nation’s economic recovery in the short term, quite apart from all of the long-term health, wellbeing, economic and sporting legacies.”

Coates noted that naysayers concerned about costs should consider the projected costs of A$4.5 billion would be considered by A$2.5 million from the IOC (based on its guarantee to Los Angeles 2028) and “The balance will be covered by national sponsorships and ticket sales.”

LANE ONE: Study shows U.S. colleges spent almost $1 billion on track & field in 2018; with more than 25,000 athletes on scholarship!

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

Speak to a track & field fan from another country, especially from Europe, and you’ll eventually get around to the question of “why is the U.S. always so good?”

It’s a worthwhile question. The U.S. has been the sport’s dominant force since Olympic medals were first handed out in 1896, where Americans won 17 of the 37 medals awarded in the first modern Games. And with few exceptions (1976, 1988 and the 1980 boycott), the U.S. has won the most medals in the sport in each Olympics since.

The American prowess in the sport is even more amazing considering that (a) the sport is not especially popular as a spectator event and (b) American athletes receive no government funding for training, as is the norm elsewhere.

It comes down to schooling.

Track & field, in all of its forms – indoor, outdoor and cross country – is the leading sport in U.S. high schools, with more than 1.58 million participants combined in 2018-19.

But the truly unique aspect of the U.S. system is in collegiate programs, where a new study has – for the first time – compiled a macro analysis of the astonishing support provided to the sport.

Texan coach George Perry, who writes the NALathletics.com blog, dug deeply into the numbers in a sensational post earlier this month and came out with some amazing analysis:

● Collegiate programs at all levels – NCAA, NAIA and community colleges – spent a combined total of $974.98 million on cross country and track (indoor and out) in the 2017-18 academic year.

That’s almost a billion dollars!

These figures are not made up; he crunched the enormous volume of data annually reported by schools for the U.S. Department of Education’s Equity in Athletics database.

● NCAA institutions accounted for $838.08 million in spending, with $364.78 million spent by NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision schools, more than any other group. NCAA schools in the Football Championship Subdivision spent $147.20 million and Division I non-football schools spent $95.90 million. The lower divisions spent a lot: $149.18 million for Division II and $81.03 million in Division III.

NAIA schools spent $103.24 million!

● Perry pointedly compares this to the annual budgets of World Athletics ($68.1 million in 2018) and USA Track & Field ($36.71 million in 2018).

And he further notes that USATF’s landmark sponsorship deal with Nike – covering 2017-40 and reportedly worth as much as $500 million in all – is less than half of what U.S. colleges and universities spend on the sport in a single year!

● From the ScholarshipStats.com Web site, the total available scholarships in the sport at the collegiate level now stands at 16,026 for track, with 6,690 for men and 9,336 for women, and 8,169 for cross country (3,512 + 4,657). The combined total of 24,195 ranks third among all sports, behind only football (30,423 scholarships) and basketball (28,819).

Some 1,277 schools fielded track & field teams, with 37,046 men and 36,526 women and 73,572 total.

● There is also some revenue in track & field and Perry’s research showed a total of $812.93 million from donations, sponsorships and ticket sales across all schools (remember, this is data provided to the U.S. government by the schools).

But where NCAA Division II and III schools both showed combined results just above break-even – +$2.20 million for Division II and +$2.52 million for Division III – the bigger the schools, the bigger the losses.

In NCAA Division I – all sections combined – the schools collected $443.78 in revenue and lost a collective $164.10 million. Almost all of that was with the big schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision, which had a combined loss of $165.16 million. Ouch!

Perry noted:

“At the 2018/19 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track & Field National Championships, 18 schools were represented in the top 13 for either men’s or women’s team scores. Five of those schools – Brigham Young University, Florida State University, Mississippi State University, University of Houston and University of New Mexico – had a balanced budget for the year. All the rest operated at a loss – a combined loss of $46.7 million.”

That loss total is more than the USATF budget for 2018 and almost as much as World Athletics collected in revenue ($47.51 million)!

Congratulations to Perry for doing a lot of work on a lot of data across hundreds of schools. But it shows that the unduplicated advantage of the U.S. in track & field – and likely as well in swimming – is the collegiate system that provides coaching, facilities and equipment to more than 73,000 athletes and scholarships – counting partial support – to likely more than 25,000 individuals in track and cross country.

It’s true that the U.S. does not provide training stipends to its elite, post-collegiate athletes and many groups – including World Athletics and USA Track & Field and many others – are trying to provide more opportunities for the sport’s professionals. But for its collegiate athletes, individual schools provide a remarkable degree of support at the time when those men and women must take the step from junior star to national class and to world class.

On Wednesday, the University of Connecticut announced that it would cut men’s cross country, men’s swimming and driving, men’s tennis and women’s rowing to deal with the budget crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic, along with 15% cuts (including the loss of some scholarships) in its 18 other sports. They are only the latest to make such moves.

No one knows what the impact of the virus will eventually be on U.S. college sports altogether and the entire sports program at some of the larger schools could implode completely if the college football season fails to materialize.

If so, the amazing edge the U.S. has enjoyed in worldwide track & field could be reduced … or start down the road of even being eliminated.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Miller Time on the IOC and protests; World Ath gives $579,000 to athletes; Diack trial wraps; IFs ranked on governance

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Miller Time ● In the continuing debate over athlete protests at the Olympic Games, veteran British columnist David Miller argues that “The priceless value of Rule 50 is exactly because it excludes protest: an immutable contract of respect among 10,000 or so athletes of every race, colour and creed.”

And while reviewing U.S. hammer thrower Gwen Berry’s 5 June open letter in favor of repealing the IOC’s current rule, he notes that “Berry proclaims athletes are silenced: for some 300-odd days a year, they can protest as often as they wish” and “Be sure, the potential platforms are extensive: ethnic cleansing in Myanmar or Congo, gay rights repression in Russia, French separatism in Quebec, repression in Hong Kong and Tibet, global corruption in 20 nations. You name it.”

Read his full comments here.

Athletics ● World Athletics completed an impressively-fast distribution of nearly $600,000 in athlete-support payments to 193 individuals from 58 nations.

The original announcement detailed $500,000 in funds, but additional contributions increased the pool to $600,000 in all, with $3,000 offered to each grantee. There were a total of 261 applicants.

Originally suggested by legendary middle-distance star Hicham El Guerrouj (MAR), the program was open to athletes “qualified for selection for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games (by entry standard), [who] had to be able to demonstrate a justifiable welfare need through significant loss of income in 2020 compared to 2019, and must never have had an anti-doping violation.”

The trial of former IAAF President and IOC member Lamine Diack ended in Paris last week, with the verdict expected to be announced on 16 September.

Diack was tried along with former IAAF anti-doping director Gabriel Dolle (FRA), Diack’s attorney Habib Cisse (SEN) and three individuals who were not present: Papa Massata Diack (SEN), Diack’s son and alleged to be the mastermind of the skimming program of funds from IAAF sponsorships; and Russians Valentin Balakhnichev (former RusAF President) and national distance coach Alexei Melnikov.

Prosecutors have asked for a four-year prison term and a €500,000 fine (~$563,127) for Diack; one of his attorneys told the court that “sending him to the jails of the Republic can only be a death accelerator” for the 87-year-old.

Agence France Presse reported that Diack attorney “Simon Ndiaye called on the judges to ‘ignore appearances, be wary of purely moral judgments’ and ‘resist the temptation to make this case an exemplary case… and Lamine Diack a scapegoat to purify the IAAF’.” Ndiaye did admit that Diack’s conduct was not ethical; “but it is not criminal” and put most of the blame on the son.

A five-year sentence, €5000,000 fine and a lifetime ban from sport was requested for Papa Massata Diack, in absentia.

Athletics International noted that the absent Balakhnichev should receive a four-year prison sentence and confiscation of €1.83 million in a Monaco account. Melnikov and Dolle were requested to receive two-year sentences, with one year suspended.

Diack’s troubles aren’t over, either. There is another trial looming, this time concerning the buying of votes for the selection of sites for the 2016 and 2020 Olympic Games, among other events.

The Russian Sports Ministry called the requirement for the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) to pay $5 million in fines before any of its country’s track & field athletes can be allowed to compete as neutrals, unfair. The Associated Press reported:

“‘The Russian Sports Ministry considers it necessary to recall the unacceptable nature of restricting the rights of clean athletes to take part in competitions,’ the ministry said on Thursday.

“Suspending the neutral athlete status would be “a wrongful imposition of collective responsibility, which contradicts the spirit and principles of international law in the area of human rights.’”

The $5 million fine is due by 1 July.

The Athletics Integrity Unit handed down another stiff penalty, this time a 12-year suspension!

Ethiopia’s Etaferahu Temesgen was declared to have used testosterone and then tampering with the doping-control process, earning two suspensions of four years for the first and eight years for the second, to be served consecutively, from 20 November 2019.

Now 31, she ran a lifetime best of 2:27:21 to finish eighth at the 2019 Toronto Marathon; that result will be wiped out by the suspension and her best will revert to 2:28:44 in Ottawa (CAN) on 26 May of last year.

On the competition front, Sweden’s reigning World Champion in the discus, Daniel Stahl, got out to an impressive 70.25 m (230-5) in Helsingborg (SWE) on Sunday.

It’s his fifth-furthest throw ever and the world leader for 2020. Countryman Simon Pettersson finished second, with a lifetime best of 67.10 m (220-2).

Terribly sad news over the weekend of the passing of Norwegian Svein Arne Hansen, the long-time director of the Bislett Games and the President of the European Athletics Association since 2015.

Hansen died Saturday (20th) at age 74 from the effects of a stroke suffered in March.

It’s no stretch to credit Hansen as one of the most dynamic figures in the sport, especially in the development of what became the Diamond League. Along with the meet directors of Weltklasse im Zurich (SUI), the Memorial Van Damme in Brussels (BEL) and the Internationales Stadionfest in Berlin (GER), Hansen was a founding member of the “Golden Four” circuit that ran from 1993-97.

In 1998, the IAAF – led by Italy’s Primo Nebiolo – created the IAAF Golden League, which added more meets and ran through 2009. The IAAF’s Diamond League was formed in 2010.

World Athletics chief Sebastian Coe (GBR) was especially impacted by the news:

“Sven gave me my first big international break in athletics at the Bislett Games in Oslo and provided me with the platform for two of my three world records in 41 days back in 1979. He was in the vanguard of globalising our sport and, along with Andreas Brugger in Zurich and Wilfred Meert in Brussels, was one of the three game changers in our sport. He brought a professionalism to our one-day meetings that is still the template today and crucially he had the political savvy to be able to do that and navigate the sport from an amateur era into becoming an open sport and then a professional sport when there was a real risk that fault lines between East and west Europe could have split the sport apart. But his loss today, alongside his much loved family, will be felt most acutely by generations of athletes whose aspirations he helped fulfill.”

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has announced a 13 July 2020 date for the case of Blake Leeper vs. World Athletics. Leeper, who wears prostheses on both legs, ran a brilliant 44.38 to win his semifinal at the USA Track & Field Nationals in Des Moines last year and finished fifth in the final (44.48).

He could have been eligible for the World Championships on the U.S.’s 4×400 m relay pool, but the IAAF’s stance is that his prosthetics provide an advantage over the 400 m distance. The question will be considered starting next month.

Football ● Japan has withdrawn its candidature for the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, leaving the joint Australia-New Zealand bid as the favorite over Colombia when the selection is made later this week.

According to Japan Football Association chair Kozo Tashima, “It was a difficult decision. Not getting support and losing will not lead to anything better in the future. We had thought about this for a couple of weeks, but this is the best decision considering all of the factors.”

FIFA ranked the Australia-New Zealand bid best in its recently-released evaluation report, scoring 4.1 points (5.0 total), with Japan at 3.9 and Colombia at 2.8. The Colombia football federation and South American confederation, CONMEBOL, complained last week about the report:

“FIFA’s administration draws some erroneous and discriminatory conclusions on three aspects of vital importance for the score of our candidacy.” These included commercial opportunities, medical services and doping control and two references to terrorism. The letter noted:

“The ‘terrorism’ alluded to with regrettable lightness by the technical report has not existed for a long time. Colombia today, lives in a time of stability and social peace, fruits of the efforts and maturity of its people.

“It denotes ignorance in relation to Colombia’s situation, and a lack of interest in carrying out, at least, minimal research of the situation in which this country finds itself currently.”

Mixed Martial Arts ● The application of the International Mixed Martial Arts Federation (IMMAF) for Observer status in the General Assembly of International Sports Federations (GAISF) was rejected:

“We regret to inform you that following a thorough discussion, the GAISF Council has resolved not to grant the GAISF’S Observer Status to IMMAF. Please be assured that we will continue to evaluate your application and reassess it in the future should you wish to request it.”

This was the third application to GAISF for the IMMAF over four years and chief executive Densign White (GBR) issued a statement noting:

“This treatment of IMMAF is as shocking as it is antiquated. International Sport would seem to be run effectively by a ‘Gentlemen’s Club’ with no requirement for accountability, transparency, representation or any other markers of good governance, despite the impact their decision making has on sports participants and communities worldwide. We urge GAISF to emerge from the era in which the modern Olympic Movement was born and become accountable, as is demanded of every other modern governance body in every other sector.

“For avoidance of doubt, we have advised GAISF that we wish our application to remain active and we will continue to campaign and fight for justice.”

Swimming ● Often, the first sign of trouble for a new sports organization is when it can’t or won’t pay its bills. It appears that the International Swimming League is having just such a problem with one of its vendors. Swimming World reported last week:

“LaPresse, a news agency that helped with media services throughout ISL Season 1, issued its ultimatum as part of efforts to seek a settlement before the matter reaches court.

“Marco Durante, owner of the news agency that supplies photographs and articles to the media on swimming and other sports on behalf of clients and event organisers, issued a warning last month to ISL founder and funder Konstantin Grigorishin: if the balance of what he says is owed to LaPresse was not paid by May 31, legal action would follow.”

ISL says the matter is being discussed between the parties. The amount involved is said to be about €200,000 (~$225,000).

Association of Summer International Federations ● The third ASOIF “Review of International Federation Governance” was issued last week and, as promised, it finally provided scores of individual IF performance on the 50-indicator test (four points per item for a 200-point total). The five performance tiers (listed in IF alphabetic order, not score order):

Group A1 (170-187 points): 6 IFs
Badminton, Equestrian, Football, Tennis, Cycling, Rugby

Group A2 (140-158 points): 8 IFs
Basketball, Fencing, Table Tennis, Triathlon, Wrestling, Athletics, Sailing. Taekwondo

Group B (120-137 points): 11 IFs
Gymnastics, Hockey, Rowing, Volleyball, Canoeing, Sport Climbing, Golf, Hockey, Shooting, Modern Pentathlon, Archery

Group C (84 to 119 points): 6 IFs
Aquatics, Judo, Surfing, Weightlifting, Baseball-Softball, Skateboarding

Two IFs were not included in the rankings: boxing (AIBA) and karate (WKF). Boxing is in a shambles and was rightly excluded. The WKF complained that answering the questionnaires were too much of a burden, but the compilers noted that 31 others managed it.

There was no further breakdown by IF of scores in any of the 50 indicators, so further analysis by IF is not possible. The report did note that those IFs which had more staff and/or more money tended to do better.

On staffing, “Based on the self-assessed responses, nine out of 31 IFs had at least 50 full-time equivalent staff and contractors, 11 had between 20 and 49 while the remaining 11 employed fewer than 20 staff. … [T]hree IFs had no more than nine members of staff – with one of those IFs being an Associate Member.”

At the BuZZer ● Olympic 800 m bronze medalist Clayton Murphy was a proud member of the Akron Zips and a two-time NCAA Champion. But he is furious with the announcement that the school’s men’s cross country program is being eliminated and the number of track scholarships for men is being reduced.

In a post on his Web site, Murphy noted that “I have posted and presented to them our analysis and evidence that refutes their assertions pertaining the need to cut cross country for either financial or Title IX reasons. We have raised money to cover the team’s budget for more than a decade, however during both conversations I was told we appreciate your passion but have nothing to discuss since the decision ‘fits into the athletic profile or ecosystem of the University’.”

The result?

“I can no longer stand with a university which continues to stand behind a publicity stunt and refuses to support a track and field/cross country program that has done nothing but continually produce successful men and women on and off the track: a program that just 4 years ago was used as a highlight of your public image. I will no longer allow the university to use my image and likeness for marketing or as a promotional asset.”

He won’t be the last one.

MILLER TIME: Olympic Ethic Outweighs Protest

South Africa's amazing 1996 Olympic marathon winner Josiah Thugwane

(This guest column is by one of the most knowledgeable observers of the Olympic Movement, Britain’s David Miller. For more than 50 years, the former English footballer has covered the Olympic Games and the sports within it, including 15 years as the Chief Sports Correspondent of The Times of London, with stints at the Daily Express and the Daily Telegraph. Author of books on athletics, football and the Olympics, he was Official Historian of the IOC from 1997-2018. His opinions are, of course, his own alone.)

May I pose a hypothetical Olympic scenario? Recall the Barcelona Games of 1992, and just suppose the current Catalonian Separatist movement had then been demonstrably entrenched, with Madrid’s Castilian government opposition exercising imprisonment. Had Catalonian sympathy among Spain’s 22 medal-winners ruptured the podium ceremonies, the truly memorable social engagement of those blissful games would have been sunk.

Here is today’s equivalent surge of emotional demand, by both individuals and several organisations exploiting the current protests, for abolition of the IOC’s Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter: prohibition of protest in the Olympic arena and more specifically on the medal podium.

Police brutality against Afro-Americans is far from being the only injustice in the world, yet now dominate media attention. If Prime Minister Boris Johnson can bow to England footballer Marcus Rashford on the Covid-19 pandemic issue of free school meals, where now stands IOC President Thomas Bach? We are not quite yet at a crossroads where amiable articulate footballers determine social morality.

For the IOC to relent, and submit to demonstration against not merely perceived but blatant and often criminal public authority injustice, would inevitably open Olympic doors to every imaginable ceremonial abuse.

Be sure, the potential platforms are extensive: ethnic cleansing in Myanmar or Congo, gay rights repression in Russia, French separatism in Quebec, repression in Hong Kong and Tibet, global corruption in 20 nations. You name it.

Led by Thomas Bach, the IOC has to hold its nerve in defence of a 3,000-year Greek ideology, faith in human nature: precious trust in the potential of mankind’s generosity and desire for integration.

There are an increasing number of protesting opponents, some opportunist and driven by the tide of civic frustration generated by Covid-19. One such is Gwen Berry. Mostly, you will not have heard of her, or indeed what she does: she throws the hammer for USA. She says in her open letter, “I’d estimate 0.01% of people know what the hammer throw is.

Berry is a fortunate woman, living in a country, whatever its injustices, which has the financial means and momentum to provide facilities for Berry’s esoteric activity, which cannot be considered likely to promote social egalitarianism for Afro-Americans but allows Berry a full sense of acceptance as Pan American champion.

Berry belongs to the agitprop organisation ‘Global Athlete,’ promotional body for professional sports ‘Athletes’ Rights.’ In a lengthy letter proclaiming Rule 50’s injustice, Berry tosses one philosophical contradiction upon another.

To attempt to separate sport and politics “is absurd,” she claims, because “governments fund the Olympics.” Not always, memorably not at LA ’84, and when they do, it is because the audience appetite exists. “Is it sport or entertainment,” Berry poses? Well, it’s both, sport itself innocent, but uniquely dramatic in entertainment because the result is unknown.

IOC rules are designed, Berry alleges, to ensure support of governments and sponsors. Yes, on the one hand, yet 90 per cent of the IOC’s receipts are invested straight back into sport (including Berry’s) via continental and international federations and National Olympic Committees.

Berry laments the “sacrifice in training” which will “never be repaid”. Has sport’s investment in Gwen Berry not granted her an agreeable professional lifestyle since 2011?

The priceless value of Rule 50 is exactly because it excludes protest: an immutable contract of respect among 10,000 or so athletes of every race, colour and creed. Berry proclaims athletes are silenced: for some 300-odd days a year, they can protest as often as they wish. To suggest the medal podium “is the most significant opportunity for peaceful protest in one’s life” is profoundly counter-intuitive – rather like raising suddenly a black-gloved fist in the middle of your wedding ceremony.

Administrative bodies parallel to Olympic events, such as continental and Paralympics, need to be careful in response to current emotions. David Grevemberg, CEO of the Commonwealth Games Federation and mastermind of the 2014 event in Glasgow, has observed: “I think we need to be supportive… what is represented on the podium is our convictions… allowing protest does not equate to politicising a Games.” Sorry, but I suggest Mr. Grevemberg is wrong. We can philosophically believe what we wish, but on the podium this is temporarily subordinated to the joy of friendship and participation. As Oscar Wilde wrote, we are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at the stars.

A past would-be Olympian in two sports, during a decade in the Eighties while chief sports correspondent of The Times, London, I campaigned in some 80 articles for reacceptance in Apartheid South Africa of those sports such as athletics and boxing which were clearly racially integrated. Globally acclaimed black South Africans would have accelerated, I calculated, the drive towards emancipation ultimately achieved by Nelson Mandela.

As commentator at twenty-four Olympics, my experience has been illuminated by non-white pinnacles: from boyhood admiration as reader about Jesse Owens to live attendance of American Billy Mills, South Africa’s Josiah Thugwane, Australia’s Cathy Freeman and many more. It was a privilege to have known that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. disciple Andrew Young, moralistic director of Atlanta ’96, who preached that response to most evil “is education.”

Comments are welcome here and or direct to David Miller here.

LANE ONE: Bankruptcy judge’s order to Nassar survivors, USA Gymnastics, USOPC and insurers: settle this case!

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

A possibly decisive turn in the long-running drama surrounding the Larry Nassar abuse cases, USA Gymnastics and the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee came during a remote hearing last Wednesday.

As a result of a remotely-held, Pre-Trial Conference before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Judge Robin Moberly issued a short, two-page order which opens the door to a possible settlement. There were three main points:

(1) The Court reiterated its prior order, allowing three depositions to be taken of USOPC staff not later than 12 July 2020.

(2) USA Gymnastics will be filing a new version of its re-organization plan, which will include options for settlement or litigation and a new Disclosure Statement to be voted on by the claimants. A hearing on this plan is expected by 19 October 2020.

(3) And then the bell-ringer:

“The Committee of Abuse Survivors, the USOPC, the insurance carriers and the Debtor [USA Gymnastics] are ordered to participate in a remote mediation with the mediators to occur on a date and time set by the mediators but to occur between July 27, 2020 and August 14, 2020. Ten (10) days prior to the mediation date, the Committee of Abuse Survivors, the USOPC, and the insurance carriers shall submit a confidential and meaningful settlement offer on the same date to the mediators. The mediators shall not disclose, other than to one another, neither the substance nor the amounts of the settlement offers provided confidentially by each of the parties.” (Emphasis in the original.)

This could be the major turning point in this case:

● Up the this point, the Survivors Committee has simply sniped at the USA Gymnastics offer ($217.125 million) and made clear its additional target is the USOPC. Now it is being required to submit specific – and “meaningful” – terms on which it would settle the case, and it has a little more than a month to do so.

● For its part, the USOPC and the insurers have asked that, for their contributions to the settlement offer, that all claims will be extinguished going forward. There is no doubt that this requirement will be carried forward, but this is an invitation – actually, a directive – for all of the insurers and the USOPC to come forward with a better offer.

● USA Gymnastics is a party to the mediation, but it has repeatedly stated – and the Court apparently agrees – that it has no funds to contribute to the settlement beyond what its insurers can supply.

The offer in the to-be-amended plan previously submitted by USA Gymnastics included a settlement that allowed these amounts to be distributed to the 517 plaintiffs without the requirement to prove their cases in court:

Subclass A (66 Elite Gymnasts), offered $1,250,758 each;
Subclass B (142 Non-Elite Gymnasts), offered $508,671 each;
Subclass C (284 Other Claimants), offered $174,401 each;
Subclass D (25 Claimants), offered $82,550 each.

In reality, the two sides facing off here are the Survivors’ Committee and the insurers and USOPC. The insurers’ liability is already outlined by the limits of the policies purchased by USA Gymnastics and the USOPC, and/or their willingness to separately litigate up to 517 cases individually. That leaves the USOPC.

And that puts both the Survivors’ Committee and the USOPC in a difficult position, thanks to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

While the Survivors Committee contends that the USOPC is partly to blame for the Nassar attacks and must contribute millions to any settlement, the committee is already under pressure because of the pandemic. During last Thursday’s news conference following the latest USOPC Board of Directors meeting, chief executive Sarah Hirshland was asked if “worst-case scenario planning” had been done if the Tokyo 2020 Games is canceled:

“The answer is we have done planning , but have not implemented any of the plans because, obviously, right now, we are preparing and planning to go to Tokyo. But we do have work done and plans in place should those Games be cancelled. It will require additional and significant financial cuts to the organization.

“We are also putting ourselves in a position to understand what ability we have to look at, you know, debt – loans for the organization – to get us through that period of time, and are putting those things in place. So, we are preparing for that scenario, not yet implementing because we are not there yet but we are absolutely putting ourselves in a position to weather that incredibly unfortunate storm if it were to happen.

“Should the Tokyo Games be cancelled, we would have to make deeper cuts, yes.”

Asked further if the already-implemented 12.5% cuts are expected to get the USOPC through the 2020-2023 quadrennial, she replied:

“Based on what we know today, and the predictions and projections that we have in place today it is our belief that that 12.5% reduction is sufficient for the quadrennial. Clearly, we all are aware that the environment is changing on a pretty regular basis, so we will and are ready to adapt as we need to adapt.

“The optimist in me says that if we have revenue that is greater than we’re projecting, we’ll be able to make deeper investments than we’re planning. However, as we all know, if revenue doesn’t match our expectations, then obviously we’ve got to adjust our expenses to match the revenue we generate. So, we will adapt and adjust, but based on what we know today and what we believe to be true, we’ve made the reductions we need to make for the quadrennial cycle.”

Now, the question will be raised in Colorado Springs about what to do about the Nassar case. As of the end of 2018 – the last period for which financial statements are available – the USOPC showed $217.9 million in cash and investments for its own accounts, and another $246.8 million in the U.S. Olympic Endowment, a fund begun with the surplus generated by the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee from the 1984 Games and which has some restrictions on its use.

But its finances are eroding because of the postponement of the Tokyo Games and the possible cancellation of not only Tokyo 2020 but also the 2022 Beijing Winter Games would devastate the operations of the USOPC and many of the National Governing Bodies which manage individual sports on the Olympic and Pan American Games program.

Judge Moberly’s order requires the USOPC to figure out what it can contribute in cash to the settlement pool, but is also a caution to the Survivors Committee to take into consideration the USOPC’s ongoing responsibilities. It could very well be the case that a dollar given to survivors would be a dollar which literally does not go to current athlete support … including some of the survivors still competing.

Let’s see if the two sides actually get serious … or if Moberly feels a need to impose more discipline on the parties. We should know in August.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

LANE ONE: Protest or not to protest? The IOC’s choices are hardly black or white; maybe John Carlos had the answer back in 1968

(Friends: As you know, TheSportsExaminer.com is a free site, but we still have expenses, for hosting and technical support. Our semi-annual bill has arrived, and if you value what you read here, perhaps you can donate to help with the costs. Thank you.)

In all eight editions of his brilliant The Complete Book of the Olympics, famed historian David Wallechinsky ended his review of the 1968 men’s 200 meters and the iconic awards ceremony featuring Americans Tommie Smith and John Carlos this way:

“John Carlos responded to criticisms that his political protest had tainted the games by pointing out that the Olympic Movement was already highly political. ‘Why do you have to wear the uniform of your country?’ he asked. ‘Why do they play national anthems? Why do we have to beat the Russians? Why do the East Germans want to beat the West Germans? Why can’t everyone wear the same colors but wear numbers to tell them apart? What happened to the Olympic ideal of man against man?’”

Political protest is now the issue of the moment, surpassing concerns about the impact of the coronavirus in the U.S. and in some other nations around the world. Even with major concerns about the staging of the Tokyo 2020 Games in front of the IOC Executive Board last week, International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach (GER) opened his media teleconference by reading a 3 1/2-minute statement entitled “The International Olympic Committee Condemns Racism in the Strongest Terms.”

Following its usual procedural approach, the Executive Board asked the IOC Athletes’ Commission “to explore different ways of how Olympic athletes can express their support for the principles enshrined in the Olympic Charter, including at the time of the Olympic Games, and respecting the Olympic spirit.”

The Athletes’ Commission has already gone through all this and issued a document in January of this year concerning Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter and its ban on protests on the field of play or in official Olympic ceremonies. It essentially says that if you protest, you could be subject to sanctions, without further details.

In the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd on 25 May in Minneapolis, the issue has boomeranged back on the IOC with new calls for freedom of expression and for athletes to do as their conscience guides them, anywhere and any time.

This has come not only from individual athletes and groups representing themselves as “authentic voices” of athletes, but also from significant organizations:

● The Commonwealth Games Foundation, which stages the 71-team Commonwealth Games every four years, said last week that athletes would be allowed “to take a knee in support of worldwide anti-racism movements” at the 2022 Games in England.

● The New Zealand Olympic Association issued a statement attributed to President Mike Stanley that “We support our athletes as they share their voices, and we look to ourselves for ways to further strengthen our commitment to equality.”

● The United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee’s chief executive, Sarah Hirshland, is forming an “athlete-led group” to compose a request for the IOC Athletes’ Commission – and by extension, the IOC – to modify its Rule 50 stance.

● World Athletics President Sebastian Coe, himself a two-time Olympic gold medalist who famously saluted – sort of “arm-in-arm” – the British media from the track after winning the men’s 1,500 m in the 1984 Los Angeles Games, told The Independent, “There is nothing in World Athletics’ Integrity Cody of Conduct to prevent athletes from protesting as long as it is done in a respectful manner, considers other athletes, and does not damage our sport.”

Ah yes, but what is “respectful” and “considers other athletes”? That’s the question, and quite a serious one.

And for the IOC, as owner and guardian of the modern Olympic Games, what is the way forward?

In this context, it’s worth remembering that the IOC – members and staff – are fully aware of the interests of athletes from the “West,” especially North America, Europe and Oceania. What do those from all the other countries think about such protests?

And while American athletes such as hammer thrower Gwen Berry, who said she expects the IOC “will continue to prioritize political relationships, profits and their own existence over the rights and freedom of athletes,” there is a wide understanding among those working in the Olympic Movement that the modern Games is designed to reflect the ancient Greek model in which warring city-states declared a truce during the period of the Games, which was – at its core – a pagan religious festival.

So what does the IOC do now? Allow protests anywhere? Shut them down? What?

Carlos asked some good questions back in 1968 and these are not lost on the IOC today. For those athlete groups looking to use the Games for their own reasons, they will likely find today’s International Olympic Committee far more sophisticated than the static discipline of then-IOC President Avery Brundage (USA).

The IOC has options, lots of options. It could simply allow protests – but what kind? – or it could consider:

● Olympic medal ceremonies have changed over time. Star Olympic historian Bill Mallon (USA) noted in an e-mail that through the 1928 Games in Amsterdam (NED):

“Sometimes the medals arrived by mail, sometimes they were given out in a ceremony near the end where all medalists approached the dignitary stand – as with Jim Thorpe [in 1912]. It varied from Olympics to Olympics. The podium started at the 1930 Commonwealth Games. That was when it was first used [and added for the 1932 Olympics in Los Angeles].

“Interesting also is that 1960 Roma was the first time medals were hung around the neck. Prior to that time the winners were just given the medal in a box.”

● Carlos asked why national uniforms are worn and anthems are played. The answer to the uniforms is that – except for the U.S., which gets no government funding for its Olympic programs – taxpayers send their athletes to the Games and want to be able to see them compete in their national colors. Numbers aren’t enough any more.

But the anthem question is different, as it applies only to the winners. So:

(1) What if the Olympic Hymm were played instead of the winner’s anthem? This is already done if an Olympic winner is from a country on suspension from the IOC, as was the case in 2016 for Double Trap shooting gold medalist Fehaid Al-Deehani of Kuwait, who competed as an individual, as his National Olympic Committee was not recognized at that Games. (Thanks to David Wallechinsky for a clarification on his status.)

(2) What if the IOC went a step further, and raised only a single Olympic flag for all three medal winners and played the Olympic Hymm? As the IOC and Tokyo 2020 look to “simplify the Games,” this would be a good way to do it.

(3) Further, why have the awards ceremonies at the venues at all?

The obvious reference is to the Olympic Winter Games, which has a separate Medals Plaza and hands out the medals in elaborate ceremonies – surrounded by music and other programming – daily, away from the venues. This was created to allow more people to honor the skiing medal winners, for whom the venue ceremonies would be limited to the small crowds around the finish lines.

If there is concern – and there will be – of on-podium demonstrations which might be offensive to some – “divisive” is the IOC’s term – why have any awards at the venues at all? Create a Medals Plaza for the summer Games and simply award medals on the following day.

This will be difficult for the Tokyo organizers to introduce at this late stage, but it could be done. It will also create another much-needed ticket opportunity for local fans, and might be a better venue for “showcasing” demonstrations than as interruptions of a crowded competition session at a sports venue.

All of these options and more are at the disposal of the IOC and its Athletes’ Commission as it considers what changes – if any – to make in its Rule 50 Guidelines in advance of the Tokyo 2020 Games next year.

The IOC is right to be concerned about protests in Tokyo, because what one considers a call for freedom on one side is a call to arms on another. Need we list all of the world’s hot conflicts, or forget the 1972 Palestinian murder of 11 members of the Israeli delegation? That was a “protest” too.

The Athletes’ Commission is no pushover, headed by seven-time Olympic medalist Kirsty Coventry, the current Minister of Youth, Sport, Arts and Recreation in the Cabinet of Zimbabwe. Neither is Bach, himself an Olympic gold medalist from 1976, or the members of the Executive Board, including Anita DeFrantz of the U.S., who filed suit against the U.S. government in an effort to allow American athletes to attend the 1980 Games.

Both athletes and the IOC have a lot to gain by finding the right way forward together in a time of global reflection, but both sides could also lose a lot, perhaps even more than they can imagine. Carlos asked a lot of good questions in ‘68; maybe he can help find some answers now.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: French prosecutors ask four years for Diack; sprint star Coleman suspended; more World Athletics finance woes

Henri Vidal's Caïn venant de tuer son frère Abel (Cain, after having murdered his brother Abel), in the Tuileries Garden, Paris (Photo: Wikipedia)

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Athletics ● French prosecutors are close to wrapping up their years-in-the-making trial against former IAAF President Lamine Diack of Senegal and five other defendants in a Paris court.

According to Reuters, the prosecution asked judges on Wednesday for a four-year prison sentence against the 87-year-old Diack for bribery, money laundering and corruption. The bribery charge alleges that Diack received $3.9 million from Russian athletes in order to cover up positive tests and allow them to continue competing.

The news service also reported that “A lawyer for World Athletics told the court the body sought 41.2 million euros in damages: ‘They destroyed athletics’ honour. The big-time sponsors have gone. We had to jettison the IAAF brand.’”

The trial is expected to finish on Thursday.

U.S. sprint star and World 100 m Champion Christian Coleman is in hot water again after the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) made public a 14 May provisional suspension for “Whereabouts failures.”

Coleman actually made the announcement of the suspension on his own Twitter account on Tuesday and included a furious reply across three pages. Highlights:

“A few days ago, the AIU came to a decision that I’ve been appealing for 6 months that I missed a test On [sic] December 9th, 2019. And now this might result in me being suspended from other filing failures that occurred well over a year ago at this point. Don’t tell me I ‘missed’ a test if you sneak up on my door (parked outside the gate and walked through … there’s no record of anyone coming to my place) without my knowledge. Knocked while I was Christmas shopping 5 mins away at the mall (I have receipts and bank statements) and didn’t bother to call me or attempt to reach me. I was more than ready and available for testing and if I had received a phone call I could’ve taken the drug test and carried on with my night.”

He noted that he had been contacted by phone “literally every other time I’ve been tested” and the report of the Doping Control Officer – posted by Coleman – includes the notation “No phone call was made per client instructions.” Very, very odd.

Coleman added that he was tested again two days later, without incident, and noted that “I think the attempt on December 9th was a purposeful attempt to get me to miss a test” and “It’s crazy that I even have to make this kind of post instead of USADA, AIU and USATF just standing with me.”

The suspension process can be lengthy and Coleman could lose additional earning opportunities at the end of the year for whatever Diamond League events are held, as well as possible Olympic and World Championships appearances in 2021-22-23-24.

The lack of a phone call and the curious notation in the Doping Control Report will have to be examined much more closely. But this is bad news for Coleman, who is the clear favorite in the men’s 100 m and has indicated he wants to run the 200 m in Tokyo as well.

There is a world of information in the documents package for the 2019 IAAF Congress held last September in Doha, Qatar. We have already reported on the audited financials and the reduction in the World Athletics reserves from $84.83 million at the end of 2016 to $45.25 million at the end of 2018.

The federation is expected to file its first-ever publicly-available financial statements this summer and do not be surprised if the reserves as significantly lowered again.

The Council Report included a lengthy review of the IAAF’s activities in 2018 and concluded with the budget for 2019 – which was almost over at that point – showing a further loss of $26.12 million:

● $36.75 million in revenues ($16.50 TV, $18.00 sponsors, $2.25 other)
● $62.87 million in expenses ($13.40 admin, $11.40 events, $14.90 grants)
● $26.12 million loss, leaving $19.13 million in reserves.

Now, the actual results might have been better, with the $3.25 million reimbursement of Russian doping investigation expenses and the new Diamond League sponsorship by China’s Wanda Group.

But World Athletics – as does so many of the International Federations – really need to have the Tokyo Olympic Games take place in 2021.

The federation is well aware of the issues facing it, and its athletes. In the Competition Commission report, the problems are clearly spelled out:

“The Commission through a Working Group reviewed the current format for distribution of prize money among top finishers at all WAS events. The Commission is well aware that the number of athletes who are able to make a living from sport-related revenue (prize money, sponsorship, equipment suppliers, grants etc.) is relatively small and that some athletes are highly reliant on income from prize money to sustain their status as professionals. The Commission has proposed alternate distribution formulae for future consideration by Council.”

Football ● The U.S. Soccer Federation made some news last week with the disclosure that it is on pace to lose $27.9 million for fiscal 2020.

Revenues were expected to be about $129.2 million, close to projections, but expenses were projected to balloon to $157.0 million, more than $14 million over budget.

There will be additional losses due to the pandemic, but USSF is well positioned to absorb such turbulence. Its 2019 financials showed reserves of $149.79 million, so the federation is still in good shape, even with the difficulties.

Gymnastics ● Legal motions continue in the USA Gymnastics abuse case in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana, where a group of survivors obtained a partial order to compel testimony from some U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee personnel, but less than was requested.

On Tuesday, Judge Robin Moberly ruled on a request by a group of about 150 survivors for a broad range of discovery and depositions of former USOPC staff members related to issues of athlete abuse in multiple sports. Because the scope of requests ventured far outside the realm of gymnastics, she disallowed all requests outside of those related to USA Gymnastics, and allowed this survivor group – which is different than the formalized Survivor’s Committee – to depose the USOPC finance officer (Morane Kerek) and two others from their list of eight, along with documents related only to USA Gymnastics.

The list includes former USOPC chair Larry Probst, former chief executive Scott Blackmun, former chief of sport performance Alan Ashley, former chief medical officer William Moreau, current chair Susanne Lyons, and others. Probst, Moreau and Ashley have already been deposed in the course of the bankruptcy action.

On Wednesday, the same plaintiff group sent a letter requesting the release of an FBI report into the bureau’s handling (or lack thereof) of its investigation into the Nassar affair. The FBI was made aware of the abuse issues in gymnastics in 2015, and an internal affairs inquiry into what was done was launched in 2018. Field offices in Detroit, Indianapolis and Los Angeles were involved, but the findings report has not been released.

A telephonic pre-trial conference was to be held Wednesday on procedures for the full hearing on the proposed re-organization plan for USA Gymnastics and the disclosure statement to sent to plaintiffs in advance of a vote for the plan and various legal options moving forward.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Diack calls son “a thug,” Tokyo sponsors wavering on 2021, Australia-New Zealand looks best for FIFA Women’s World Cup ‘23

Former IAAF President and IOC member Lamine Diack of Senegal (Photo: Wikipedia)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

Vox Populi ● Further to our Lane One column for 10 June (“Racism becomes issue one for IOC, but consensus will be favored over loud voices”), this from a veteran high school coach and devoted track & field fan:

“Very nice take on the rules re demonstrations. So much of world-wide competition is nothing except political, the most obvious and egregious being the limitations placed on number of competitors allowed per country based upon the citizenship of the participants.

“I’ve been thumbing through some of my old T&F News, particularly the World Championship issue from 1983.

“The ‘East’ German women dominated the sprints, jumps and hurdles. Equal representation given to the West Germans, although not as ‘successful.’ Where are the West and East Germans now?

“The ‘Soviet Union’ has since broken up, into all of the Balkans and the Stans, including Ukraine and Belarus. In the eighties, these teams were all allowed 3 representatives per team. With the expansion, or shrinkage of recognized international boundaries, the citizens of such have either been cheated out of, or given a ‘pass’ to participate worldwide.

“See Keni Harrison in the women’s hurdles, 2016: did not get to the Olympics, although she set the world record the same season following her ‘failure’ to qualify for the American team.

“On the other hand, Mondo Duplantis is pretty much assured a non-pressured acceptance to international competition, given his claim of Swedish citizenship, despite being raised as an American from Louisiana.

“Perhaps it’s time to recognize sectional representation for worldwide competitions, that would recognize these inequities. Examples would be, allowing a Western, Southern, Midwestern, and Eastern USA to have teams in the Olympics and Worlds for swimming and T&F. The question is, which national anthem to play on the medal stand?

“How about NONE. Do we really need to raise the flag? Get all teary-eyed, watching the Red, White and Blue being raised, listening to the Star Spangled Banner?

“No.

“The best meet, in my opinion, is the NCAA Championships, because of the identification with the schools and regions involved. I may be wrong, but I don’t recall the school songs being played at the medal ceremonies, including the team championship at the conclusions. This takes nothing away from the competition and excitement inherent in these meets.

“Much more on this subject, I’ve just raised the issue because of the inequities involved because of political affiliation. On any level.”
~ Ron Brumel (Los Angeles, California)

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020“We’ve been asking if we can use the same venues for the same means. Adjustments remain, but we’ve reached a general understanding with about 80 percent.”

That was Tokyo 2020 chief executive Toshiro Muto last Friday, noting that discussions are continuing on availability and terms for the athlete’s village – with many of the apartments already sold to post-Games buyers – as well as two convention facilities: Tokyo Big Sight, slated to be the Main Press Center and Makuhari Messe in Chiba, expected to host fencing, taekwondo and wrestling.

According to a survey by the Japanese broadcaster NHK, about two-thirds of Tokyo 2020’s domestic sponsors are “unsure” whether they will extend their agreements beyond the end of 2020.

“NHK conducted a survey of 78 Olympic and Paralympic sponsor companies in May, and 57 of them responded.

“About 12 percent of the respondents said they intend to extend their contracts with the Organizing Committee. About 65 percent said they have not decided. Those sponsors said they have not started any specific talks with the committee on the matter.”

There was great concern among the respondents that the Games might be held without spectators, which was considered to be “tantamount” to a cancellation of the Games from the sponsor’s standpoint.

Athletics ● More astonishing testimony in the trial of former IAAF President and IOC member Lamine Diack (SEN) and others for bribery, extortion, money laundering and more in Paris.

On Monday, Diack was again on the stand. Agence France Presse reported:

“On Monday, he said he was surprised to discover how much commission his son [Papa Massata Diack] was taking on sponsorship deals he negotiated on behalf of the IAAF.

“Lamine Diack said he did not know that VTB, a state-owned Russian bank, paid 29 million euros ($32.75 million) to sponsor the IAAF from 2007 to 2011, while his federation only received 19 million euros.

“The remaining 10 million euros ended up in the account of a company called ‘PMD’, the son’s initials.”

The prosecutors have also accused Diack of allowing his son to skim money from IAAF sponsorships deals with Samsung and China’s CCTV broadcaster. Asked about his son’s role, Diack told the court, “I thought he could sell.”

Diack, now 87, was asked by his attorney if he regretted standing for a fourth term as federation chief; he answered “unquestionably.”

Last Thursday, the elder Diack confirmed his meddling in Russian doping cases. According to The Associated Press:

“Diack acknowledged, however, that he had intervened in the management of suspected cases of doping by Russian athletes, giving instructions that they be handled in a way that would avoid a scandal that could disrupt negotiations with a Russian sponsor and tarnish the 2013 world championships in Moscow.

“Rather than having a group of Russian athletes being sanctioned at the same time, ‘we said the procedures should be spread out,’ Diack said.”

Asked about his son’s activities by one of the judges, Diack replied “He conducted himself like a thug.”

The trial is expected to continue through Thursday.

There was actually some good competition last week, as the Bislett Games organizers in Oslo (NOR) put on “The Impossible Games,” last Thursday, with athletes competing in small groups – and without fans – in multiple locations.

A total of 13 events were held, with some excellent performances, leaving us to wonder what we might have been seeing in an Olympic year under other circumstances:

Men/300 m hurdles: Norwegian star Karsten Warholm ran alone and set a world best of 33.78 for the rarely-run distance.

Men/1,000 m: Norway’s Filip Ingebrigtsen ran a national record of 2:16.46, but was the only one of four starters to finish.

Men/2,000 m: Perhaps the most anticipated of the events, the Norwegian section (five runners) was won by Jakob Ingebrigtsen in a European Record 4:50.01, ahead of brothers Henrik (4:53.72) and Filip (4:56.91), with the other two starters failing to finish.

In Nairobi, Kenya, another five-man race was held, with Tim Cheruiyot winning in 5:03.05, ahead of Edwin Melly (5:13.12) and Elijah Manangoi (5:18.63), and two more non-finishers. If only they had all been on the same track at the same time!

Men/25,000 m: Norway’s Sondre Moen ran a European Record of 1:12:46.5 as the only finisher in a five-man race.

Women/10,000 m: This might have been the best performance of all, as cross-country skiing superstar Therese Johaug ran all alone and finished in 31:40.67, which would have ranked her 37th in the world for 2019 and seventh among all Europeans! Not bad for a 31-year-old, in her second track 10,000 m ever.

In the field events, Mondo Duplantis (SWE) won the vault at 5.86 m (19-2 3/4), Norway’s Marcus Thomson (21.03 m/69-0) won the shot and Sweden’s Daniel Stahl (65.92 m/216-3) took the discus.

Also last week, Noah Lyles posted a video of a workout time trial in Florida, winning a 300 m dash in a quick 31.51 despite easing up at the finish. In a real race, that mark would have moved him to no. 8 on the all-time list and no. 4 in U.S. history.

Cycling ● USA Cycling nominated its Mountain Bike, Road and Track Cycling teams for Tokyo for 2021 last Thursday, with several medal favorites among the selections.

In Mountain Bike, former World Champion Kate Courtney leads the squad and another Worlds medal winner, Lea Davison was also named.

The women’s Road team includes 2019 World Time Trial Champion Chloe Dygert, two-time World Time Trial champ Amber Neben, UCI Women’s World Tour star Coryn Rivera, 2018 Tour of California winner Katie Hall and 2017 Tour of the Gila winner Tayler Wiles.

The women’s Track squad includes Omnium/Points/Scratch Race star Jennifer Valente, along with her World Championships Team Pursuit title teammates Dygert, Emma White and Lily Williams.

Tejay van Garderen, who skipped the Rio Games due to Zika virus concerns, was named to the men’s Road squad and is a dangerous time trialer.

CyclingNews recently released its list of the 50 most influential people in the sport, with some surprises. At no. 10 was the disgraced Lance Armstrong, and the site noted “[T]he Texan – like it or not – still has influence, albeit of a different kind these days. When he talks, we listen, and in terms of stardom and infamy, he still has no equal.”

Road stars Egan Bernal (COL: no. 6) and Peter Sagan (SVK: no. 5) were described as the star of the future and “still the undoubted star of his generation,” respectively.

The top three show where the power is in the sport: no. 3 is Yann Le Moenner (FRA), the chief executive of the Amaury Sports Organization, which owns the Tour de France and controls the Vuelta a Espana and other historic races including Paris-Roubaix and Liege-Bastogne-Liege. No. 2 is UCI chief David Lappartient (FRA) and no. 1 is Marie-Odile Amaury, owner of Groupe Amaury with her two children.

Vive la France!

Football ● FIFA issued its evaluation report of the three bids received for the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, with the proposed Australia-New Zealand bid considered the most technically competent.

All three of the bids – also including Colombia and Japan – were considered sufficient to hold the 2023 tournament, which will be the largest ever at 32 teams. However, the Australia-New Zealand bid received 4.1 points out of a possible 5.0, with Japan at 3.9 and Colombia at 2.8.

Importantly, all three bids offered existing stadia for the event, with both the AUS/NZL facilities and Japan’s stadiums receiving a 3.7 grade. Colombia’s stadiums graded out at 2.5. The selection is slated for 25 June.

Gymnastics ● USA Gymnastics won a round in court last Thursday to allow the federation to pursue financial assistance under the CARES Act for its Paycheck Protection Program. Rules issued for the use of PPP funds by the U.S. Small Business Administration had prohibited firms in bankruptcy from trying to obtain such funds, but the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued an order allowing USAG to apply.

As to the continuing bankruptcy proceeding regard USA Gymnastics and the Nassar abuse cases, a pre-trial conference will be held on Wednesday afternoon to review procedures for a planned hearing on 24 June to consider the disclosure statement for the reorganization plan submitted by the federation.

Swimming ● The Southern California News Group’s Scott Reid reported last week that a series of law suits were filed in California against USA Swimming and “allege USA Swimming, including former executive director Chuck Wielgus, and other top officials, the local associations and clubs were aware of [national team coach Mitch] Ivey, [national team director Everett] Uchiyama and [coach Andy] King’s predatory behavior but refused to address it, creating a culture of abuse that exposed dozens of underage swimmers to sexual abuse and harassment. It is a culture, survivors maintain, that continues to exist within USA Swimming.”

Wielgus passed away in 2017, but the others are still alive. The story reported a statement from USA Swimming that “The organization and its current leadership remain committed to providing a safe environment and a positive culture for all its members. The three named offenders have long been on USA Swimming’s list of Individuals Permanently Suspended or Ineligible for Membership due to the allegations of misconduct from the 1980s and 1990s, and the U.S. Center for SafeSport has recognized and honored our bans.”

Accusations of abuse in swimming have long predated the Nassar scandal in gymnastics and some of the actions in the present suits apparently date back to the 1980s.

Weightlifting ● The World Anti-Doping Agency confirmed its continuing work in digging further into the doping issues presented by the McLaren Report to the International Weightlifting Federation. A Monday statement noted in part:

“WADA has since started to analyze the newly received information, which covers the period 2009-2014, to see what further action may be warranted in relation to anti-doping matters highlighted by the investigation. WADA is committed to ensuring that all athletes who are identified as having breached the rules, are brought to justice. The Agency has also made a request to the McLaren Investigation Team to share the remainder of the relevant information as described in Professor McLaren’s report published on 4 June, in particular so it can assess whether anything should be done from a compliance perspective.”

Amid all the promises of future action, USA Weightlifting announced last week that it had created a “a limited number of tuition scholarships to qualified black coaches to attend either the Level 1 or Level 2 Coach Certification courses. The scholarship covers the tuition cost of the certifications as well as one year of USAW membership. Any travel-related or non-tuition expenses are not covered.”

There are 10 full-tuition scholarships to be awarded annually. USA Weightlifting chief executive Phil Andrews tweeted “We listened, we found a donor, we acted. Scholarships to assist to generate more African American coaches.”

LANE ONE: Full IAAF financial documentation for 2018 details massive losses now, plus foreboding for the future

This time, the information came in the mail.

Our 5 June exclusive, revealing for the first time the financial standing of the International Association of Athletics Federations (now World Athletics) was based on an unexpected call from an individual who had access to that data and just read it out over the telephone.

A few days later, a message was received from a different person – many thousands of miles away – asking if there was interest in seeing the entire document file of the IAAF’s 52nd Congress, held in Doha (QAT) last September.

Yes! Send it!

It’s a thick, elegant, double-comb-bound book of 306 pages, printed on heavy, coated paper stock with many color charts and photographs. It covers dozens of subjects, including committee reports, elections, financials and a lot more. Some federations such as the FEI (equestrian) and FISA (rowing) – and others – make these compilations public on their Web site for anyone interested to inspect. Any and every federation which says it believes in accountability and transparency should do this as well, NOW.

In the case of the IAAF, there was a lot to learn about its financial situation from seeing the complete financial report plus the accompanying notes … and some important commentary buried deeper in the documents.

First, a quick review of the financial statements as we previously reported:

● As of 31 December 2018, the IAAF had total assets of $59.52 million, with reserves of $45.25 million. That was down considerably from the 2017 figures of $77.79 million in assets and $64.80 million in reserves, reflecting a big loss in 2017.

● The 2018 activities statement showed a loss of $19.33 million, on revenue of $47.51 million and operating expenses of $66.84 million. There were additional investment losses, so the total losses for the year were $19.55 million.

● That was only slightly better than the $20.03 million loss for 2017, with just $40.54 million in revenue – in a World Championships year – and operating expenses of $60.10 million (plus some small investment losses).

So the federation lost $39.58 million in that two-year period, with the reserves falling from $84.83 million to $45.25 million at the end of 2018. Wow.

That’s what you get from the financial statements. The notes reveal more – a lot more – of the story:

● First off, the statements presented to the IAAF Council were, in fact, audited financials. Ernst & Young did the auditor’s review and stated that “In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects” the financial position of the IAAF as shown.

● On the revenue side, the financials show 94.2% ($44.76 million) came from television and sponsorships for 2018. This included $18.23 million from television rights, plus sponsorship income from the Japanese marketing giant Dentsu of $26.53 million.

The details are in Note 1, which explained:

“Television income from ESPN/EBU is received twice per year and covers the broadcast rights for all of the IAAF events for the year. The current agreement was signed in April 2018 and covers the period from January 01, 2018 to December 31, 2023. …

“Dentsu income is split into two parts: the first part corresponds to the Commercial rights and amounts to US $11m per year. The second part relates to TV rights in Japan and amounts to US$ 7m per year. The invoices are made on 4 equal installments per year and income is recognised as received during the year.

“During the year, an amendment was made to the agreement for the period of 2020-2029 was signed. The new agreement calls for a minimum guarantee over the 10-year period of US$ 130m. The agreement with Dentsu also included a profit share income. During 2018, there was a payment of US$ 8.396m received from Dentsu as profit share for the period of 2010-2017. The next payment for profit share will be made in 2020 for the period of 2018-2019. Revenue related to profit share will be recorded when cash is received by the IAAF.”

Note 11 identifies the television revenue as only “EBU,” which leads one to believe that the payments from ESPN (possibly partnered with NBC) are quite small. In any case, worldwide television rights for IAAF competitions brought in only $25.23 million for 2018; that’s depressing. Sponsorship of $11.00 million for 2018 only – not counting the 2010-17 profit-sharing – is also disappointing.

The IAAF also received an estimated $5.6 million in value-in-kind sponsorships n 2018, for which it paid commissions of $779,283 (13.9%).

● The IAAF spent $16.73 million for “events” in 2018, led by $4.55 million in spending for the Diamond League, $3.73 million for the Continental Cup in Ostrava (CZE), $3.04 million for the 2018 World Indoor Championships in Birmingham (GBR) and $1.34 million for the World U-20 Champs in Tampere (FIN). That’s 75.7% of the Events total; there was spending on seven other events as well.

● In a separate section on commissions was a very interesting report from the Audit and Finance Commission, chaired by former London 2012 Olympic Games chief executive Paul Deighton. Some highlights:

“This is the second year for EY as external auditor for the IAAF, and EY’s work this time has been much more straightforward due to the improvements in internal controls put in place by the CFO [Vineesh Kochhar] and his finance team. …

“Management had confirmed its assumption that the group remains a Going Concern and this assumption was considered reasonable and supportable by EY.”

The last item is a big deal to accounting geeks. It says that the auditors felt the IAAF was not in danger of a financial collapse, despite the major losses in 2017-18. With an expected $39.5 million coming from the IOC for the 2020 Olympic Games, this made sense from the viewpoint of the end of 2018. But with the 2020/1 Games now in jeopardy and normal television and sponsorship money vaporizing due to the coronavirus pandemic, is that still true today?

Some of those answers will come from the planned release of World Athletics financials for 2019 later this summer. More concerns from the commission report:

“The progress of the commercial programme has been encouraging, reflecting major improvements in the relationship with Dentsu and renewals by existing sponsors and broadcasters on improved terms.

“However, benefits will not materialise at the levels anticipated without the addition of significant new sponsors, and although the pipeline is active, to date these have not been secured. The commercial programme cannot be relied upon to cover expenditures at the current level, mandating a more disciplined approach to expense management.” (emphasis added)

This was a clear warning for the future, with the situation only worsening with the pandemic problems in 2020. The Audit and Finance Commission, created in 2016 to help the IAAF reclaim financial control after the Diack years, ended its work with the 2019 Congress and a new committee is being established under the direction of the new World Athletics Executive Board.

These are difficult times for World Athletics, as well as for so many other International Federations. As World Athletics chief Sebastian Coe (GBR) has repeatedly noted, there is a lot to do and steps have been taken to review (and change) and competition calendar to make it more fan-TV-sponsor friendly, attract more commercial interest and get some bridge financing from the International Olympic Committee. And the creation of the Athletics Integrity Group ($7 million cost in 2018) and the multiple legal and scientific challenges the federation has been involved in have also cost money.

One positive note, buried deep in the statements:

“On May 31, 2019, the IAAF received from the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) an amount of US$3.2m as reimbursement of costs incurred by the IAAF since the suspension of RusAF in 2015. This reimbursement includes expenses incurred by the IAAF till March 31, 2019.”

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

LANE ONE: Racism becomes issue one for IOC, but consensus will be favored over loud voices

Olympic cross-country gold medalist and IOC member Kikkan Randall of the U.S. (Photo: Frankie Fouganthin, via Wikipedia)

There are plenty of people who will tell you the International Olympic Committee is deaf. Not this time.

Although the preparations for Tokyo 2020 were expected to be the lead item at Wednesday’s online meeting of the IOC’s Executive Board, IOC President Thomas Bach (GER) began the post-meeting media teleconference by reading a 309-word statement:

THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE (IOC)
CONDEMNS RACISM IN THE STRONGEST TERMS.

The IOC stands for non-discrimination as one of the founding pillars of the Olympic Movement, which is reflected in the Olympic Charter, Fundamental Principle 6:

“The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Olympic Charter shall be secured without discrimination of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, sexual orientation, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.”

The Olympic Games are a very powerful global demonstration against racism and for inclusivity. They are a celebration of the unity of humankind in all our diversity. Athletes from all 206 National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and the IOC Refugee Olympic Team all enjoy the same rights, respecting each other and with the same rules applying to everyone without any kind of discrimination. All these athletes live peacefully together in the Olympic Village, sharing their meals, their thoughts and their emotions.

This is in the DNA of the Olympic Games and the IOC as an organisation. Our founder Pierre de Coubertin said: “We shall not have peace until the prejudices that now separate the different races are outlived. To attain this end, what better means is there than to bring the youth of all countries periodically together for amicable trials of muscular strength and agility?”

The IOC Executive Board supports the initiative of the IOC Athletes’ Commission to explore different ways of how Olympic athletes can express their support for the principles enshrined in the Olympic Charter, including at the time of the Olympic Games, and respecting the Olympic spirit.

By participating in the Olympic Games, the athletes are proof of this principle of non-discrimination for any reason. Their respect for all their fellow athletes gives us a glimpse of how humankind as a whole could live together peacefully and respectfully.

This displaced the questions about Tokyo 2020, the scandal enveloping the International Weightlifting Federation and much more. In the following 50 minutes of questions-and-answers with the 240 media on the call, four of the 11 inquiries were about the IOC’s stance on discrimination and on its Rule 50, which prohibits protests.

The key question and reply came late in the discussion, as Graham Dunbar of The Associated Press asked:

“Regarding Rule 50, you know the Athlete’s Commission doesn’t have a great track record of listening to the athletes with the strongest opinions, nor of coming to conclusions with differ very much from the Executive Board. For the athletes that are a bit skeptical, what should give them confidence that in this process, the Athlete’s Commission could have a kind of change of view in the same way the NFL has?”

Bach answered him directly; please read this carefully:

“First of all, the Athlete’s Commission of the IOC is in regular contact with the athlete representatives from all around the world. There are regular telephone conferences, they have many bi-lateral meetings. It may be very well the case that there in the athlete’s community, there is not only one opinion, and that there are differing opinions.

“But as we could also see in the discussion about the postponement of the Olympic Games, there the opinion of the IOC Athlete’s Commission was shared, almost unanimously by all the more than 200 athlete representatives that were on a phone call . You may also recall that, in the drafting of the Athlete’s Rights and Responsibilities declaration, there were several thousands of athletes participating in this. You can also see there very intensive discussion going on on Athlete365 [IOC athlete’s site].

“So I really think the Athlete’s Commission is really taking the pulse of the opinions of the athletes and is reflecting very well the opinion of the majority of the athletes. Again, diverting opinions are a normal democratic procedure.” (emphasis added)

Bach also noted, in reply to different questions, that:

“We must make a difference between such support for the principles enshrined in the Olympic Charter, and potentially divisive demonstrations”

and

“The framework has been set, and now let the Athlete’s Commission – and let the athletes – discuss among themselves and then coming up with the relevant proposals.”

Translation: Bach was clear in his answer to Dunbar that the loudest voice in the room will not necessarily be the one to set the policy. That also means the loudest National Olympic Committee may not get its way, either.

All of this will focus the attention of U.S. athletes on 2018 Olympic Winter Games gold medalist Kikkan Randall, who is the lone American athlete on the IOC Athlete’s Commission. She was elected in PyeongChang for an eight-year term, which has just now gotten started after her successful, post-Games fight with cancer. She will be key to representing the “voice” of U.S. athletes in the Athlete’s Commission discussions, possibly advancing whatever comes out of the just-announced U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee’s athlete group.

Process is a major part of democracy. For U.S. athletes, any desire for change won’t depend on ear-splitting volume, but creating a vision of participation in the Games that can be shared by other athletes in other nations from around the world. And Randall has to carry the banner forward.

There is a lot more to process from this and more discussion coming. But this was not the only topic of the day:

Tokyo 2020: The IOC and the Tokyo 2020 organizers have so far created about 200 proposals to try to compact the Games and hold down costs. These are principally in the areas of (1) service levels at the Games, (2) quantities of stuff ordered, (3) activities at the Games, (4) operations, such as whether full test events are needed and (5) venue use and logistics.

Paris 2024: The IOC will maintain its schedule of approving the final list of events and sports in December 2020. Further, the old overall limit of 10,500 athletes – originally for Barcelona in 1992 – will be reinstated for 2024 and beyond. So, for the four “extra” sports requested by the Paris organizers, every athlete added to the Games will eliminate an athlete elsewhere.

Weightlifting: The brutal report of bad governance and doping abuse submitted to the International Weightlifting Federation has led to further inquiries, with the IWF requested to provide more details for review. Bach noted that there were sections of the McLaren Report not made public and which dealt in depth with doping, and the IOC would like to see this before taking further action.

Members: The Executive Board proposed five new members for the IOC, including World Athletics chief Sebastian Coe (GBR) on the condition that he disassociate himself from active involvement with a company which does business with the IOC. Among the other four as two really interesting choices: Saudi Arabian Princess Reema Bandar Al-Saud, the current Saudi ambassador to the United States, and former Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kotiarovic.

And check out the U.S. connections: Bandar Al-Saud attended George Washington University; Grabar-Kitarovic attended Los Alamos High School in New Mexico and was a Fulbright Scholar at GWU, and Mongolian candidate Battushig Batbold earned his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Chicago and Masters in Business Administration from Harvard. Remember them for the future.

There were also results changes in five Olympic events due to doping, for London 2012 (2), Rio 2016 (2) and Sochi 2014 (1).

For those looking for the worldwide impact of the George Floyd killing, the IOC has underscored it. What that means for the future, however, is that it will be part of a continuing discussion that has – amazingly – benefited from the postponement of the Tokyo Games to next year.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

THE TICKER: Ex-IAAF anti-doping chief was told to hush up Russian doping; 20-year ban for horse abuser; MMA petitions for step toward Olympics

Lamine Diack (SEN), former IAAF president and IOC member, whose trial on corruption charges in France has begun

The latest news, notes and quotes from the worldwide Five-Ring Circus:

Athletics ● The trial of ex-International Olympic Committee member and former IAAF chief Lamine Diack of Senegal finally started in a Paris courtroom on Monday, with the former head of the IAAF’s anti-doping effort conceding pressure to cover up Russian positions.

According to Agence France Presse, Gabriel Dolle – the French ex-IAAF anti-doping head – explained that there were 23 possible Russian doping positives on list in early 2012, but that Diack had “asked me to consider… the critical financial situation” of the IAAF.

“With the list… it was going to cause a scandal which could have influenced negotiations with sponsors and put them in jeopardy.”

According to the AFP report:

“Dolle said he was ‘trying not to provoke a scandal’ and the man who considered himself to be a ‘hardliner’ insisted he had never avoided handing down punishments for doping offenders.

“When the judge in the trial, Marie-Rose Hunault, pointed out that some of the names on the list who were allowed to continue competing not only went on to take part in the 2012 London Olympics, but won medals, Dolle said he had been ‘betrayed’.”

Dolle admitted he received €190,000 (~$215,362 today) in “bonuses” from Diack for, first, handling the Russian cases and then for his being fired “in a brutal and ungrateful way.”

The trial continues this week.

Russian doping is again in the news with the provisional suspension of 2010 European high jump champ Alexander Shustov. The Associated Press reported that the Court of Arbitration for Sport stated that “he was banned for the use or attempted use of a banned substance or method, without giving any further details.”

Shustov’s results are annulled from 2013-17, but told a Russian news agency he plans to appeal. Now 35, he has not competed since 2016.

Boxing ● Time has claimed another champion, this time the 1956 Olympic gold medalist in boxing, American Pete Rademacher. He passed at age 91 in Sandusky, Ohio last Friday (5th).

Rademacher played football at Washington State, then became a boxer during his military service. He won the 1956 Olympic Games heavyweight tournament, defeating Russia’s Lev Mukhim in the final.

After winning the gold medal, Rademacher opened his professional career in amazing fashion, facing Floyd Patterson for the world heavyweight title! He lost the match after being knocked down seven times and was counted out in the sixth round.

He was predeceased by his wife Margaret, but is survived by his three children.

Equestrian ● The Federation Equestre Internationale (FEI) Disciplinary Tribunal imposed a stunning 20-year ban on UAE rider Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Faisal al Qasimi for abuse of an Endurance horse in 2016.

He rode Castlebar Contraband in a 90 km event in Fontainebleu (FRA), who fractured his right leg during the race and had to be euthanized. A post-mortem exam found the horse had been receiving the prohibited substance Xylazine – typically used as a sedative or muscle relaxer – but not allowed in competition.

A fine of CHF 17,500 (~$18,230) and another CHF 15,000 towards court costs. The suspension will run to 27 May 2040.

Football ● Brazil withdrew from the race to host the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup, citing the costs of the event and that given the coronavirus’s impact on national economics, that the national government would not sign the financial guarantees required.

That leaves Colombia, Japan and a joint bid from Australia and New Zealand as the possibilities for the expanded tournament that will have 32 teams. The decision is expected later this month.

Softball ● One of the truly inspirational leaders in the Olympic Movement, long-time International Softball Federation chief Don Porter (USA) passed away at the age of 90 on Sunday (7th).

Porter was a lifetime proponent of softball, and was Executive Director of the U.S. Amateur Softball Association from 1963-98 and was the head of the International Softball Federation from 1987-2012.

He realized his lifelong dream to get women’s softball into the Olympic Games, beginning with the 1996 tournament in Atlanta, followed by 2000-04-08, after which the sport was dropped. But working through the specially-formed World Baseball-Softball Confederation, he was able to return it to the program for the 2020 Tokyo Games.

Porter made Oklahoma City the softball capital of the U.S., championing the building of the USA Softball Hall of Fame Stadium, now the annual site of the NCAA Women’s College World Series.

He will be remembered as kind, affable and charming, but in a way in which you knew clearly what his agenda was, and why it was beneficial. He was the driving force for softball in the Games and was rewarded for his efforts, but only after decades of work.

Weightlifting ● The day after the damning McLaren Report on corruption in the sport was released, the International Weightlifting Federation announced that three Russian lifters had tested positive for anabolic agents in 2015:

Nadezhda Evstyukhin won three World Championships golds in 2011-13-14 at 75kg. She was the 2008 Olympic silver medalist at 75 kg before being disqualified by the IOC for using the blood booster EPO.

Oleg Chen won three World Championships silver medals at 69 kg in 2011-13-15, and

David Bedzhanyan won Worlds medals at 105 kg in 2013 (silver), 2014 (bronze) and 2015 (silver).

All three are retired now. The disposition of their cases and any changes in their results are yet to be confirmed.

Mixed Martial Arts ● One of the sports trying to move into the future Olympic sphere is Mixed Martial Arts. Its international federation is now circulating a petition to gain further recognition, and stated that it received more than 10,000 signatures in its first week in circulation.

According to the statement, “The International Mixed Martial Arts Federation (IMMAF) and MMA stakeholders assert that formal recognition would enable the implementation of governance and regulations to ensure health and safety for recreational participants, as well as amateur and professional athletes.

“It would help foster youth development in MMA, and afford same rights and protections for MMA athletes as students of other sports, such as access to medical services, insurance, anti-doping, safeguarding, etc. In addition, formal recognition of MMA as a sport by the Olympic Movement would pave the way for MMA to become an Olympic sport and allow MMA athletes to represent their country on the world’s most prestigious sporting platform.”

The IMMAF has been trying since 2016 to gain any recognition from the World Anti-Doping Agency and the Global Assembly of International Sports Federations (GAISF), but is a member or signatory of neither at present. It has undertaken legal action against WADA and is trying to pursue Observer status with GAISF.

Whatever its future with WADA or GAISF, it’s hard to see much enthusiasm for Mixed Martial Arts at the Olympic level, given the IOC’s push to be seen as an agent for peace and continuing questions about the compatibility of combat sports on the existing Olympic program.

United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee ● Chief Executive Sarah Hirshland called for the formation of an “athlete-led group to challenge the rules and systems in our own organization that create barriers to progress, including your right to protest. We will also advocate for change globally. All Team USA athletes who are interested in participating are welcome.”

The announcement did not specify a timeline, or the size of the group. Stay tuned.

HEARD AT HALFTIME: Ajan says McLaren Report charges “unfounded” while 11-year-old skateboarder Brown survives brutal crash

Former International Weightlifting Federation president Tamas Ajan (HUN). (Photo: IWF)

News, views and noise from the non-stop, worldwide circus of Olympic sport:

“The claims against me are unfounded”

That’s the reply of former International Weightlifting Federation President Tamas Ajan to allegations in the just-released “Independent Investigator Report to the Oversight and Integrity Commission of International Weightlifting Federation.”

In a statement, Ajan noted:

“In my whole life I have respected the law, the written and unwritten rules and practices of sport.

“In accordance with the IWF Constitution, all necessary decisions were taken by the Executive Board of the International Weightlifting Federation. It was the Executive Board that approved the annual budgets, and the Audit reports submitted by the independent Swiss Auditors – proving the legal handling of the finances – were approved by the Congress.

“The claims against me are unfounded.

“During the investigation I fully cooperated with Mr. McLaren and his team, however, much to my regret and despite my request they never provided me with the information that would have given me the possibility to disprove their statements, and they published the report without giving me the chance of clarification.”

The next steps are up to the IWF and to the Hungarian courts. The International Olympic Committee is expected to take up the question of what to do about weightlifting at its Executive Board meeting on Wednesday (10th).

Games of the XXXII Olympiad: Tokyo 2020 ● The chatter around the Tokyo Games continues with Toshiaki Endo, a member of the Liberal Democratic Party and also a Tokyo 2020 Board member saying that “Selecting athletes by around next March will be a major challenge. The organizing committee will need to make some kind of a decision considering the situation at that time.”

That’s just about right and a parallel time frame to this year’s decision on 24 March to postpone the Games to 2021. Both the Tokyo organizers and the International Olympic Committee have said that if the Games are not held in 2021, they will not be held at all.

On the planning side, the Kyodo News Agency reported that specific aspects of the Games may be “simplified” in order to reduce costs and raise safety protections:

“The changes could include a reduction in the number of spectators and a scaling back of the opening and closing ceremonies of both the Olympics and Paralympics, according to the sources.

“The provision of medical services, including polymerase chain reaction tests for athletes, staff and spectators, and restrictions on outings from the athletes’ village are also being floated as possible measures against the virus.

“‘We hope to work together with the government and the Tokyo organizing committee to look into what can be rationalized and simplified,’ Tokyo Gov. Yuriko Koike told reporters. ‘It will be necessary in order to gain empathy and understanding from the public.’”

The Association of National Olympic Committees backed up its promise to help financially-troubled NOCs in advance of the postponed Tokyo Games with a fund of $11.65 million.

The announcement noted that the funding will be made “on a case-by-case basis for exceptional needs, or indirectly, via Continental Association’s Tokyo 2020 specific projects (e.g. training camps or athlete preparation programmes.)”

This is a lot of money for ANOC, whose last financial report showed reserves of $36.88 million as of 30 June 2019, but with $10 million expected to be spent in the last half of 2019 and another $11-13 million “earmarked to cover additional expected costs related” to the 2019 General Assembly and the World Beach Games held on Doha.

The Associated Press reported “An ‘open discussion’ is under way with insurance brokers, the IOC’s Olympic Games operations director Pierre Ducrey said Thursday. The aim is ‘to try and find the right level of compensation to help us bear the cost of having to wait another year,’ Ducrey said.”

IOC chief Thomas Bach has said that its policies cover cancellation of a Games, but not specifically a postponement. The IOC paid $14.4 million in premiums against cancellation of the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Games and has paid more against a loss of the 2020 Games, but the question of postponement coverage is a new issue.

Games of the XXXIII Olympiad: Paris 2024 ● A “shift in approach” due to the coronavirus impact was a main theme in an IOC Coordination Commission online meeting with the Paris 2024 organizers last week.

The IOC posted a statement on the meeting, noting “This new approach is inspired by the recent letter from the IOC President, which was then echoed in the message from Paris 2024 President Tony Estanguet to all Paris 2024 stakeholders, that called for creative and sustainable optimisations in the context of the Olympic and Paralympic Games.”

One important development was announced: “the reduction in the number of beds required in the Olympic and Paralympic Village from just over 17,000 to approximately 14,000. This ensures that the Village is fitted to the needs of the athletes and National Olympic Committees, while controlling the amount of investment required and still leaving an important housing legacy for the Seine-Saint-Denis area of Paris.”

That’s good.

Athletics ● The “Ultimate Garden Clash – Combined Events” was held on Sunday, with France’s Kevin Mayer – the world-record holder – winning the three-event program with 71 points, ahead of German Niklas Kaul (63) and Estonia’s Maicel Uibo (61).

Mayer competed from Montpellier, France; Kaul from an indoor facility in Mainz (GER) and Uibo was at an outdoor track in Clermont, Florida. The competition started with the pole vault, to see who could clear 4.00 m (13-1 1/2) as many times as possible within 10 minutes, then to the shot to get as many throws as possible over 12.00 m (39-4 1/2), and then a “shuttle run,” with cones at 20 meters apart and the goal to complete as many round trips as possible in five minutes.

Mayer cleared the vault bar 17 times, and won the shot competition with 28 throws beyond the minimum. Kaul won the shuttle run with 27 round trips, with Mayer and Uibo at 26.

The event was shown on YouTube, which showed 35,523 views in about the first 24 hours following the event.

There was a major shock last Friday as Bahrain’s Salwa Eid Naser, the women’s 400 m World Champion from 2019, was provisionally suspended by the Athletics Integrity Unit for missing four doping tests, three of which were prior to the 2019 Worlds in Doha, Qatar.

The AIU released a rare statement on the incident, which included:

“The investigation into Ms. Naser’s three whereabouts failures in 2019 was ongoing at the time of the Doha World Championships and she was not provisionally suspended at that time. Following conclusion of investigation and a fourth whereabouts failure in January 2020, a Notice of Charge was issued and Ms Naser subject to an immediate Provisional Suspension.”

Naser, 22, won the event in a sensational 48.14, the no. 3 performance of all time. In an Instagram video, she said “I’ve never been a cheat. I will never be. I only missed three drug tests, which is normal. It happens. It can happen to anybody. I don’t want people to get confused in all this because I would never cheat.”

As of now, she is suspended and a finding of a doping violation could lead to a suspension of up to four years.

Although the mini-decathlon challenge was fun, the best performance of the weekend may have been American distance runner John Raneri’s world-best of 1:03:08 for the half marathon … on a treadmill!

David Monti of Race Results Weekly reported that Raneri, who has run 61:51 for the Half on the roads, had the machine on its highest speed possible the entire time. “I felt 30 seconds faster was possible if the treadmill was able to go faster. I say that in hindsight.” He broke the 2015 mark of Tyler Andrews (USA) of 1:03:37.

Raneri ran the distance in his coach’s garage in Flagstaff, Arizona (~7,000 ft. altitude), which makes the achievement even that much more remarkable. Wow!

Gymnastics ● Sad news last Friday of the death of American gymnastics star Kurt Thomas, the first U.S. men’s gymnast to win a World Championships gold medal, He died at 64 from complications from a stroke on 24 May.

Thomas was the 1978 World Championships gold medalist in the Floor Exercise, then won six medals (!) at the 1979 Worlds in Ft. Worth, Texas. He repeated as the Floor Exercise winner, and also won the Horizontal Bar, earned silvers in the All-Around, Parallel Bars and Pommel Horse and a bronze in the Team Competition. Only Simone Biles (in 2018) has won as many medals in a single Worlds as Thomas, among American gymnasts.

A 1976 Olympian at 20, Thomas missed his chance for Olympic glory in 1980 with the U.S. boycott and elected to turn professional and skipped the 1984 Games. He is survived by his wife Beckie and children Hunter, Kassidy and Kurt.

Skateboarding ● One of the possible stars of the 2020 Olympic Games if held this summer – and may still be next summer – is 11-year-old British skateboarder Sky Brown. But she suffered a fractured skull and broken bones in her left hand from a bad fall during a ride on 2 June.

She was training in an indoor facility in Southern California and veered off a vertical ramp. She was taken to a hospital and released on the following day.

“I don’t usually post my falls or talk about them, because I want people to see the fun in what I do, but this was my worst fall, and I just want everyone to know that I’m OK. I’m just going to get back up and push even harder. I know there’s a lot going on in the world right now and I want everyone to know that whatever we do we’ve got to do it with love and happiness.”

Brown is a true multinational: she competes for Britain, but divides her time between Japan and Southern California. Her father is British, her mother is Japanese, she was born in Miyazaki, Japan and lives in Huntington Beach, California.

At the BuZZer ● Central Michigan is the latest to drop sports in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, eliminating men’s track & field as part of school-wide cuts. This lowers the number of men’s sports at CMU to five, which would usually disqualify it from participation as a Division I school, requiring six men’s sports.

But the school received a two-year waiver from the NCAA, allowing it to remain in Division I for now. This continues a growing pattern of sport cuts at NCAA schools due to the economic damage from the pandemic; with possible additional impacts from the passage of new rules allowing widespread athlete income from name-image-likeness programs, a permanent reduction in sports participation requirements looks more and more likely.

Inexorably advancing is the question of at what point do universities – especially those outside of the major conferences – simply drop intercollegiate athletics altogether?

LANE ONE: American athletes should write their own version of the IOC’s Rule 50: freedom found or Pandora’s Box?

Jesse Owens atop the victory podium for the 1936 Olympic long jump, with Naoto Tajima (JPN) and Luz Long (GER). (Photo: Wikipedia)

“The IOC’s current position is very clear in regards to protest. Whether you agree or not, and choose to follow the rules, will be with the athletes. It is very unclear what the punishment will be for any infringement or what an infringement may look like. Like black and brown people in America it’s unclear how the rules will apply to them and fear is the order of the day.”

That’s from a very carefully composed, four-page letter posted on Twitter (full text here) entitled “Sport, Politics, Protest and the Olympics,” written by Gwen Berry, at the center of the American athlete-protest swirl in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd by a (now-ex) Minneapolis police officer.

Remember that Berry, the 2019 Pan American Games gold medalist in the women’s hammer, raised her fist on the victory stand in Lima, Peru last August during the playing of the U.S. national anthem, reminiscent of the 1968 Olympic protest of Tommie Smith and John Carlos during the awards ceremony for the men’s 200 m.

She told Nancy Armour of USA Today afterwards, “It’s too important to not say something. Something has to be said. If nothing is said, nothing will be done, and nothing will be fixed, and nothing will be changed.”

Berry was placed on probation by the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee afterwards, noting that her actions had broken the written agreement – required from all participants – to abide by the rules of the Pan Am Games, which also prohibits podium protests.

Berry’s letter continues:

“Ultimately, the rules are designed to ensure governments and private investors continue to support future Olympics and the IOC’s own survival.

“Athletes aren’t stupid, and the sacrifices they and their supporters, have had to make for the 10 or more years of training, to make the Olympics, can never be repaid.

“To suggest that sport and politics should not or are not part of the Olympics and that life is about free and fair play is demeaning and disrespectful.

“Rule 50 is a step backwards to 1968 where protesting athletes were stripped of their medals and thrown out of the games, protesting for causes which even the IOC admits now are legitimate.

“I expect the IOC will continue to prioritize political relationships, profits and their own existence over the rights and freedom of athletes.

“Despite these barriers, I am determine [sic] to work as hard as I can to make things better for the black and brown communities in the United States. My protest and sacrifice will not have been for nothing. The issues we face are too important to be ignored.”

(Fact check: Smith and Carlos were expelled from the U.S. team after their protest, but their medals were not taken away and they remain the gold and bronze medalists in the ‘68 men’s 200 m.)

Her reference is to Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter (2019 edition); section 2 states:

“No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas.”

In the aftermath of protests by Berry and American fencer Race Imboden during their Pan Am Games victory ceremonies last year, as well as protests by swimmers Mack Horton (AUS) and Duncan Scott (GBR) during victory ceremonies with alleged doper (and now suspended) Yang Sun of China during the 2019 FINA World Aquatics Championships, the IOC asked its Athletes Commission to create a set of Rule 50 guidelines to clarify the rules for the upcoming Tokyo Games.

That document was issued in February and included:

Where are protests and demonstrations not permitted during the Olympic Games?

“• At all Olympic venues, including:

“o On the field of play
“o In the Olympic Village
“o During Olympic medal ceremonies
“o During the Opening, Closing and other official Ceremonies

“• Any protest or demonstration outside Olympic venues must obviously comply with local legislation wherever local law forbids such actions.

During the Olympic Games, where do athletes have the opportunity to express their views?

“While respecting local laws, athletes have the opportunity to express their opinions, including:

“• During press conferences and interviews, i.e. in the mixed zones, in the International Broadcasting Centre (IBC) or the Main Media Centre (MMC)
“• At team meetings
“• On digital or traditional media, or on other platforms.

“It should be noted that expressing views is different from protests and demonstrations. It should be noted, too, that these guidelines are also applicable to any other accredited person (trainers, coaches, officials, etc.).”

Since then, there have been varying opinions from current and former athletes from multiple countries about the right to speak out vs. the appropriateness of using the Olympic podium.

This may be exactly the right time to hear them, but in a high-profile, live event.

● With the Olympic Games postponed until 2021, isn’t this the right time to ask American athletes to create their own concept of Rule 50 and to re-write the rule and the Rule 50 Guidelines issued by the IOC’s Athletes Commission into a form they feel is appropriate?

● This can be done at a conference in an easy-to-access, middle-of-the-country city such as Denver or Chicago, starting with the Athletes Advisory Council members for each sport, and adding those who wish to participate such as Berry. Arrange the event in a large ballroom and keep the coronavirus-induced social-distancing requirements in place as needed.

● Live-stream the entire proceedings, and if done over Labor Day or a similar holiday weekend, significant parts can be carried over national outlets such as the cable news channels and C-SPAN. The texts of all remarks should be published.

● The drafting of new rules and guidelines can be assisted by any of the many lawyers who are already deeply involved in athlete’s issues in the U.S. And there needs to be an expert in the intricacies of the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act present to review compliance with federal law.

● Deliver the completed, proposed revision to IOC President Thomas Bach (GER) in a ceremony in Lausanne the following week.

Sound easy? Putting on the event is the easy part, and not that expensive. The hard part is composing a rule and regulations which will actually work.

Simply saying that any form of protest is acceptable at any time sounds like an easy solution. But would Smith, Carlos, Berry and Imboden appreciate:

● A Nazi salute during an awards ceremony? That’s what happened during the 1936 Berlin Games; while Jesse Owens was saluting the American flag during the long jump awards ceremony, Luz Long was giving the Hitler salute (pictured above). How about an entire delegation marching in and giving such a salute? The French team did in 1936; they were conquered four years later.

● Someone pulling on a Ku Klux Klan hood during a national anthem?

● How about an Iranian medalist wearing t-shirt emblazoned with “Death to America” and/or “Death to Israel” or a similar sentiment?

You can expand this list infinitely with other domestic political statements from the other 200 nations which attend the Games. What are the boundaries? If there are none, are there no actions to be considered offensive?

Even in the U.S., our right of free speech actually has some limits. But for Berry and others to really be heard, they should have a national platform to do so and have the opportunity to present their formulation to the International Olympic Committee, (much) sooner rather than later.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.

LANE ONE: Final federation finance data found, as World Athletics financial data leaked: lots of reserves, but lots more spending

A few days back, the telephone rang, from a number I did not recognize, but I picked it up anyway. I was glad I did.

During our three-part series on finances of the 28 summer International Federations, only Athletics and Modern Pentathlon were found not to have posted any data at all. After our analysis of the federation data (here), UIPM Treasurer John Helmick (USA) called to say that the federation had posted its audited statements in response to being left out (here).

(For reference: Part 1 covered Archery to Hockey and Part 2 included Judo through Wrestling)

That left World Athletics, formerly known as the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), which has never publicly posted its financials.

“I see you have been taking Athletics to task over not having financial statements. Well, I have them right in front of me.”

The document the caller was referring to was the financial information provided to delegates at the IAAF Congress on Doha, Qatar, prior to the 2019 World Championships last September. And then I started typing furiously as the numbers were read to me:

● This was the data provided to the Congress delegates and was not a set of audited financial statements, but a report of balances and activity summaries, covering the calendar year 2018.

● The good news was that as of the end of 2018, the IAAF – as it was known then – had reserves of $45,246,758. That’s 11th-highest among all of the summer federations.

The bad news was that 2018 losses had reduced the federation’s reserves, which had been at $64,801,522 just one year prior.

● Revenues for 2018 were $47,511,383, with 94% from television rights sales and sponsors. That was well ahead of the total for 2017, with $40.54 million recorded.

● Expenses for 2018 continued a dangerous climb from 2017, at $66,840,283, well ahead of the also-high $60,098,650 from 2017. Wow!

● Of the 2018 expenses, the leading items were for administration ($17.34 million), events ($16.73 million), area and member federation support ($10.44 million), the Athletics Integrity Unit ($7.08 million), sport development activities ($3.05 million) and $1.34 million for communications and promotions. There was $10.86 million in other spending.

I was told that one member of the Audit Committee pointed out during the Congress that the current rate of expenditures is not sustainable and a change in approach is needed.

No kidding. The IAAF’s revenues of $47.51 million ranked it sixth among all summer IFs, but it’s $66.84 million in expenses was fifth-highest, behind only FIFA, World Rugby, FIBA and the International Tennis Federation, leaving it with less than one year’s revenue in reserves.

Remember, that was for 2018. As for 2019, there were two new developments recently reported: one that the federation’s revenues had moved up to about $55 million and that audited financials – to be publicly posted – are expected to be issued this summer, perhaps within a few weeks.

All of this lines up perfectly with the teleconference comments of World Athletics President Sebastian Coe (GBR) in late April. Asked about the federation’s finances, he replied that discussions were to take place with the International Olympic Committee for bridge support until its share of the Tokyo Olympic television revenues come through in 2021; the IAAF received $40 million after the Rio Games, which would help restore its finances nicely.

Coe added:

“Look, all the International Federations have been hit hard, there’s no question about that. We’re not in a parlous [perilous] state, our own financial management in the last few years was under very challenging circumstances.

“I became president at a time where – you will remember – we had to stabilize the ship. We had to spend a lot of money on doing that, we created the Athletics Integrity Unit, doubled the budget for our independent anti-doping processes and also added some really tight structures in there for the broader issues of integrity and we had some big challenges in courts around Russia and [Differences in Sexual Development] and all the things we have led from the front on, and that’s been expensive and cost us too.”

But he also underscored that the goal of prior IAAF administrations to build up a big reserve – started under Primo Nebiolo (ITA) who was the federation’s head from 1981-99 – was not his priority:

“I’ve never been in the mindset of thinking that as an international federation I have anything other than grant-aided funds. It’s not our money. We have a responsibility to be the custodians of that. And who are we the custodians of it for? The member federations. So that grant-aid, that grant-funding goes through into development and delivery of our sport; 80% of that goes almost directly to the athletes. So, you know, the end user is very important here.”

And true to his word, World Athletics has established a $500,000 fund (provided by the International Athletics Foundation) to help with direct support to athletes who have met the qualifying standards for the Tokyo Games, but whose income has been decimated by the lack of competition opportunities due to the coronavirus.

Asked for comment, World Athletics spokeswoman Jackie Brock-Doyle (GBR) added:

“World Athletics, like many other Olympic sports, works on a four-year business planning cycle, balancing expenditure with only committed revenues to reach a ‘break even’ situation at the end of the four-year period. We have a lot of rigour in our expenditure processes which, of course, was not always the case, particularly under the previous administration. Managing our expenditure in a transparent and robust way was a core pillar in the reforms we introduced a couple of years ago.

“We will be publishing our 2019 accounts this summer under the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) rules. These rules have required us to review and align all our accounting methods and processes to the standards for both 2019 and the previous year. This large piece of work has now been completed together with our auditors.”

There are other positive signs.

Most important was the major sponsorship agreement with Wanda Group, the Chinese sports promotion company, which purchased the 10-year rights as title sponsor of the Diamond League – now the Wanda Diamond League – at a reported total payment of more than $100 million.

World Athletics just announced another deal, an unusual alliance with the British law firm Pinsent Masons as its “official supplier of legal services,” hoping the firm’s broad reach will lead to more opportunities.

Everyone who follows the sport knows that tough times are coming next week, with the bribery, extortion and money-laundering trial of former IAAF President Lamine Diack (SEN) scheduled to start in Paris on 8 June. Agence France Presse reported that Diack, now 86 and under house arrest since 2015, is facing up to 10 years in prison and:

“The prosecution alleges Diack obtained $1.5 million of Russian funds to help fund Macky Sall‘s 2012 successful campaign for Senegal presidency election, in exchange for the IAAF’s anti-doping arm to cover up offenses by 23 Russians.”

Earlier this year, it was reported that World Athletics would be suing Diack for £35 million (~$43.9 million) for the money he skimmed from what should have been federation funds, but also for the enormous damage to its reputation.

With the criminal trial to begin next week, the civil trial will follow later, so any recovery will be months – if not years – in the future. But Coe & Co. can use it, to be sure.

Sometimes it actually is worth answering the phone, even if you don’t recognize the number.

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX Report by e-mail by clicking here. You can also refer a friend by clicking here.